I was looking at the Ruger website
http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FASubType?type=Revolver&subtype=Double Action
and compared the weight of the Redhawk 7.5" revolver to the SRH w/7.5" barrel - the weight difference is only 1 oz. greater for the SRH.
Does this seem right to you guys?
From the picture the SRH looks much bigger, larger frame and the barrel looks thicker too. Yet Ruger lists the weights as 52.5 (redhawk scope mounting model) & 53.5 oz for the SRH?
I have heard the S&W is way off when they list their revolvers weights. Does anyone know about Ruger?
P.S. since I'm talking about SRH's anyone else think the alaskan is just a SRH with the barrel cut off at the frame?
http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/FASubType?type=Revolver&subtype=Double Action
and compared the weight of the Redhawk 7.5" revolver to the SRH w/7.5" barrel - the weight difference is only 1 oz. greater for the SRH.
Does this seem right to you guys?
From the picture the SRH looks much bigger, larger frame and the barrel looks thicker too. Yet Ruger lists the weights as 52.5 (redhawk scope mounting model) & 53.5 oz for the SRH?
I have heard the S&W is way off when they list their revolvers weights. Does anyone know about Ruger?
P.S. since I'm talking about SRH's anyone else think the alaskan is just a SRH with the barrel cut off at the frame?