• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Ruger Single Six Value?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike J

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
3,359
Location
Georgia
So in the classified of another forum I frequent I keep seeing a Single Six for sale. The seller says it is a new model made in 1974. Describes the bluing as being 98-99%. Says the rifling is good etc. Also it has fixed sights & a 6 1/2" barrel.

The add started higher but it is down to $325 shipped now. I honestly haven't spent much time on revolvers & am not familiar with their values. Any opinions on whether this is a deal or not?
 
Mike J

If this Single Six is as nice as it's advertised to be (98-99% bluing), and is otherwise in decent shape, then I would say $325 shipped to your dealer would be a fairly good deal.
 
Thanks guys. I guess now I have to decide how bad I want it. I don't have a single action revolver at the moment though & I kind of want an example of each different action type of handgun to school my kids on.
 
Mike J

Hard to go wrong with a Single Six. Well made, easy to use, and a .22 single action revolver can be perfect for teaching young shooters how to get a proper sight picture and trigger control. Definitely slows them down a bit (unlike my kids who with their semi-autos have already blasted through a brick of ammo before I even get all of my gear unpacked).

2Siun8I.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have a Ruger reproduction print on metal that features that era Single Six. It show a hand holding the SS and a large coiled Western Diamondback on the ground. I have the newer version of the SS with adjustable sights and in my opinion they are excellent revolvers.
 
Mike J

Hard to go wrong with a Single Six. Well made, easy to use, and a .22 single action revolver can be perfect for teaching young shooters how to get a proper sight picture and trigger control. Definitely slows them down a bit (unlike my kids who with their semi-autos have already blasted through a brick of ammo before I even get all of my gear unpacked).

View attachment 764955
I just love the look of this Ruger revolver,I don't one I just think they are beautiful.
 
If1HitU

This particular Single Six was a gift from a friend of mine. It was already fairly well used when he got it and he took it with him when he use to run his trap lines. When I got it I cleaned it up a bit and finally found a decent pair of factory grips to go with it. I have had several of the Super Single Sixes, along with a number of Blackhawks, but I always liked the look of the sights this model has.
 
I just picked up a Single Six with a mag cylinder that was made in 2011 for $375 and I absolutely love it! I wasn't much of a single action guy before, but Ruger has converted me.
 
Does it have both .22LR and 22WMR cylinders?

I apologize for neglecting to answer this question. I scrolled through too fast & missed your post. I was thinking I should have already given that information. It is listed as .22 LR. (No mention is made of .22 Magnum). How much would this effect the value. To be honest I probably wouldn't use the .22 magnum cylinder anyway if I got it but I am sure value is probably different between having just the .22 LR or having both cylinders.
 
Mike J

Same guy who sold me the grips for my Single Six also sold me a .22 Mag cylinder (he even fit it to my gun). Just like having a little extra horsepower every now and then with my .22s.
 
Ya, despite being more expensive and harder to find, the .22 Magnum is a fun cartridge to shoot...especially for a beginner "graduating" from a .22 LR to a round with a bit more noise and a touch of felt recoil. Out of the single six the .22 magnum is a lot of fun to shoot, so if you can get a cylinder for it you won't regret it.

I use the .22 mag on a herd of 1/5 AR 500 silhouettes that I drag out and plink at once in a while. The .22LR will take down the Rams and Bears with a well-placed shot, but the Bison ones I have just "ping" when hit. The magnum takes them all down hard, with no issues at all. If I needed to thwack a marauding coyote close in, the .22 mag would be my first choice.
 
If the condition is as described, then I agree with most everyone else that $325 is a good price.

I paid $275 for a stainless 5.5 inch model from 1981 that only had the .22lr cylinder. But this was about 6 or 7 years ago, and the gun wasn't 98-99% condition. You can get another Mag cylinder from Ruger if you really want to.


The main thing is how you feel about the 6.5 inch barrel, I would think. If I planned on carrying the gun around much at all, I would think long and hard about it personally.
 
If the condition is as described, then I agree with most everyone else that $325 is a good price.

I paid $275 for a stainless 5.5 inch model from 1981 that only had the .22lr cylinder. But this was about 6 or 7 years ago, and the gun wasn't 98-99% condition. You can get another Mag cylinder from Ruger if you really want to.


The main thing is how you feel about the 6.5 inch barrel, I would think. If I planned on carrying the gun around much at all, I would think long and hard about it personally.

I am debating the barrel length. Not because of a desire to carry it but because if I get this its primary purpose would be as a plinker to help train my kids. My oldest girl is 12, she has a 10 year old little sister & a 4 year old little brother (little brother isn't shooting yet}. I find myself thinking I would be better off with a shorter barrel due to the weight. A shopkeeper might be a better fit for us. To be honest the Single Six is a temptation because it is a quality revolver at an inexpensive price which makes it tempting I'm just not sure it is the right fit for my purposes.
 
Sounds like a decent deal. It's hard to ever go wrong with a Single Six. I hardly ever use the magnum cylinder but I suppose it's nice to have.
 
I bought this 1968 Single Six 3 screw 5.5 inch 22LR with holster in nice condition for $350 last year. I'm glad got it. I think $325 sounds fair if it's in good condition.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0307.JPG
    IMG_0307.JPG
    118.8 KB · Views: 12
Having not seen it in person and just from what was presented it seems a decent deal for the OP. The magnum cylinder would be a definite plus even if it's never used. Would increase value if the gun is ever sold. I wanted a single six for years and finally got one in May of 2016 that the LGS took in on trade. Not mint but nice although the ejector housing was a little beat up but a used replacement was procured from Numrich. The gun cost 400 bucks + tax, came with both cylinders and IIRC I spent about 40 bucks for the ejector housing. It's now my favorite 22 handgun out of the three I own. It's very accurate with either 22LR or 22mag. and it's a gun I couldn't wear out in my lifetime if I tried. 22 mags are a hoot to shoot but for general plinking the 22LR cylinder gets most of the use for financial reasons. Off the top of my head I think the serial number places it as a 1980 production and God only knows how many rounds it had through it before I got it. But it seems as tight as new and shows no real wear on any of the operating mechanisms. These things are sweet and I only wish that I had gotten one sooner. Here's a few pix that were taken on a day it had the mag. cylinder in it. IMG_2097.JPG IMG_2098.JPG IMG_2100.JPG
 
Armored farmer

That was the same model Ruger Single Six that I had so many years ago. Always liked the look of the 4 5/8th" barrel. Sold the Ruger when I got hooked on semi-autos and the allure of their 10 round capacity and their quick and easy mag reloads. Would have bought another one awhile back but a friend of mine gave me his older Single Six so now I'm set!
 
I've got one in 4 5/8" around 1970 version don't use the mag cyl much but it's great
to have, great gun, I keep it loaded with snake shot all summer as we have a problem with rattelers.
I think the price is right.
JD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top