Ruger SP-101 Trigger reach

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sig229guy

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
3
Location
Massachusetts
Looking for a good CCW revolver. Preferred method of carry would be pocket holster in the summer or IWB in winter. Used to have a S&W 649, but found that it was simply too small for me (I have large hands), trigger reach was way to short for my tastes (although I did like the concealability). I've been looking at the Ruger SP-101 (2" barrel with spurred hammer), looks like it is slightly larger but still concealable. I would imagine the trigger reach would be slightly longer, anyone know if this is so?
 
You're right in thinking that the trigger reach is further on an SP101, but I have no way of knowing if the difference is enough to matter or not. The problem with a K-frame S&W is that the grip is a little long for pocket carry, but it works fine when using a IWB holster.

You might also check out a now-discontinued Colt Cobra or Detective Special, which is lighter and easier to pocket carry then a SP101, but has about the same trigger reach.

Concerning the S&W J-frame revolvers: You can get stocks that build up the area behind the backstrap, and in effect move the trigger finger backwards. In your case that might be a solution.
 
I just compared the two since I have my SP101 on me and my wife is sitting on the couch with her J-frame and their is very little difference. My SP101 has the stock grips and her J-frame has a set of crimson trace laser grips. The crimson trace grips may lengthen the trigger reach a little.
 
I have a fairly new 3" SP101 and I have small/medium hands. I didn't like the looks of the stock grips, so I put on some Pachmayr Compacs with the backstrap covered (not Compac Pros). Both the stock grips and the Pachmayrs (both Compac and Compac pros) have the same problem as a lot of the "concealment" grips: they don't cover the space right behind the trigger guard, so your trigger finger occupies this space and sits high up on the trigger. The trigger curves forward as it goes down, so the higher your finger, the shorter the trigger reach. I found that these grips gave me a very "crowded" grip with a trigger reach that's too short. Also, the higher your trigger finger, the less leverage it has because it's closer to the pivot point on the trigger. That makes the already-heavy trigger feel even heavier and makes the gun not very fun to shoot and messes up my standard grip.

Possible solution: a grip that fills up the space behind the trigger guard, so that the trigger finger is lower where it has more leverage, a longer reach and a grip that isn't crowded. I haven't had a chance to try one yet, but all of the Hogue grips seem to be designed this way. Here's a photo of what I'm talking about:
SoftRubberMonogrip.jpg

As you can see, if the trigger finger is right behind the trigger guard, the trigger reach will be shorter (too short for me) and the pull will be harder. With this Hogue grip, the trigger finger is going to be lower, with a lighter-feeling pull. Again, I haven't tried these grips yet (I'm ordering some soon), but any grip that puts my finger right behind the trigger guard gives me a poor grip, too short of a reach and no leverage. And again, my hands are not big.

Of course, there's no free lunch, so the Hogues are going to be less concealable and because your hand is lower relative to the bore (compared to small grips), recoil control may be a bit tougher. But concealability and recoil are secondary factors to me compared to grip. If the grip isn't right, the gun isn't right.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top