progunner1957
member
Okay, here's the deal: A good friend of mine loves to go river canoeing and camping in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve area of Alaska, where big Grizzlies live and roam.
He has decided on S&W's 460 magnum with the 4" barrel as an emergency bear countermeasure in a handgun. He also takes a Marlin lever action in .45-70 stoked with Garrett Hammerhead ammo for bear.
If a big Grizzly attacks your tent at night thouugh, a long gun will be difficult to manuver in the close quarters of a tent, hence the need for a hand cannon.
Obviously the S&W 500 magnum would be a better choice than the 460. He is looking at the 460 though, because it is more controllable, more shootable and ammo is not as expensive, which would allow for more practice.
It seems to me that if you don't want to go with the 500 magnum, the 460 mag is the next best choice in a handgun for stopping power on big bears.
So my question is: In a handgun, is the 460 magnum a good choice for big Grizzlies? Not for actual hunting, but for defensive use only.
Thanks for you input, folks!
He has decided on S&W's 460 magnum with the 4" barrel as an emergency bear countermeasure in a handgun. He also takes a Marlin lever action in .45-70 stoked with Garrett Hammerhead ammo for bear.
If a big Grizzly attacks your tent at night thouugh, a long gun will be difficult to manuver in the close quarters of a tent, hence the need for a hand cannon.
Obviously the S&W 500 magnum would be a better choice than the 460. He is looking at the 460 though, because it is more controllable, more shootable and ammo is not as expensive, which would allow for more practice.
It seems to me that if you don't want to go with the 500 magnum, the 460 mag is the next best choice in a handgun for stopping power on big bears.
So my question is: In a handgun, is the 460 magnum a good choice for big Grizzlies? Not for actual hunting, but for defensive use only.
Thanks for you input, folks!