Q!!
Member
Just a hypothetical question for those of you with knowledge of both weapons........
If you had a brand spankin new M&P .40 and you were offered a slightly used SIG 229 .40 in trade would you do it?? Please give reasons as to why you would or would not.
I shot my brother's M&P .40 and liked it so I picked one up. I have yet to shoot it. When I picked it up from the shop there was a guy in there that I know who offered his SIG on the spot. I have never owned a SIG but always wanted one. Which is the better weapon? Would mainly be used for HD and carry when i am not toating my PK380. Thanks in advance.
If you had a brand spankin new M&P .40 and you were offered a slightly used SIG 229 .40 in trade would you do it?? Please give reasons as to why you would or would not.
I shot my brother's M&P .40 and liked it so I picked one up. I have yet to shoot it. When I picked it up from the shop there was a guy in there that I know who offered his SIG on the spot. I have never owned a SIG but always wanted one. Which is the better weapon? Would mainly be used for HD and carry when i am not toating my PK380. Thanks in advance.
Last edited: