Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s&w m&p hate

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by jamal28, Jul 15, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,819
    Location:
    northern california
    As I said, I thought it was common knowledge, obviously not as common as I thought.

    Trigger control is fundamental to accuracy. Smooth trigger travel makes that control easier, but certainly isn't a determinate of accuracy

    I wouldn't know who to blame for not telling you, you'll have to figure it out for yourself

    I've had that discussion with them, we're personal friends, and they do it for the same reason that Ed Brown offers a full length recoil spring guide...because there is a customer demand for it. Some people would much rather spend money than put in work, plus a large portion of the M&P market will be happy with the stock trigger. If they could capture even half the M&P market, they'd be rolling in money...they're not

    I'm the last one to poo-poo the advantages of the Apex Tactical FSS action kit on my M&P, but I don't deny that it is a crutch for my lack of dedication to practice.

    I've also had the trigger of every S&W revolver I own tuned as well as action work on all my pistols. I freely admit to being a trigger snob, but it doesn't make it any less of a crutch
     
  2. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,665
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    Well, as per usual in these types of threads, the brand-bashing is perpetuated by one repeat poster ... in this case, one who doesn't seem to have much recent experience with a good sample size of the platform being discussed, and one who finally admits that he doesn't like polymer-framed striker fired pistols.

    "Lousy triggers?" My sample size for this pistol runs in the hundreds, not one or two or three ... Some of the triggers are better than others, but as noted, Apex provides a superb upgrade. Accuracy? Some M&Ps are quite accurate, most are average, a few are mediocre at best. The M&P gamut probably runs about the same spread as every other production plastic pistol.

    One moderator notes that in his local IDPA matches, he's seen some repeated issues with M&Ps. One might wonder about the operators' maintenance habits, as I've seen large numbers of these pistols go through very high round count training with nary a hitch. This may be due to the fact that our armorers go through the S&W factory armorer school and are pretty attuned to detecting and rectifying issues with problem guns ... and all our people are trained to shoot one gun pretty much all the same way (we still see individuals who have some bad habits that occasionally induce the same malfunctions). I will add that we have had some mechanical issues with our M&P-45s, but the 9s have been solid

    Good cleaning and maintenance, using good quality ammunition, good shooting mechanics, and the platform is as reliable as any other out there, IMO.
     
  3. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,810
    Location:
    Central PA
    Of the folks I've known with these problems, three are Master ranked shooters, others at least Sharpshooter class. My circle of shooters includes one of the most well known M&P gun "plumbers" (mentioned in this thread, in fact) and yet these problems sometimes persist.

    To be fair, most of these shooters would consider "several thousand rounds" only a month or two's amount of shooting, and I don't have a way to know the average round count on any of their guns. Still, even a couple years' worth (say 25,000-30,000rds?) shouldn't be causing them these problems.
     
  4. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,810
    Location:
    Central PA
    Ahhh, expand your mind! :)

    Actually, just listen to what 9mmepiphany said. He hit the nail right on the head. Anyone who says they "need" a great trigger and can't shoot a box-stock Glock or M&P (or Smith J-frame for that matter) well is admitting far more about themselves than they are about the gun.

    It isn't as easy to shoot precisely with a less-than-glass-rod-perfect trigger. But there is nothing at all in that less than perfect trigger causing the gun not to be accurate. It's all in your focus and ability to control that trigger. If your skills are "there" it shouldn't matter what the trigger feels like.
     
  5. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,556
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    This would be about right for my M&P Pro 9mm which has never given me any extraction/ejection issues.

    I was mentioning the 9mm conversions because they *should* be more sensitive to extractor/ejector issues because of the extra 1mm slop in the breech face. I don't shoot the 40c much, but when I do its usually with the 9mm barrel. The 40 conversion I haven't used since I got the 9mm Pro, but I liked it so much I jumped on a Pro when I found one at a good price.

    OTOH I've not messed with the recoil spring or trigger, only added the extra power striker spring to get reliable ignition with my reloads (mostly Tula primers these days, might not be needed with others, but I didn't notice any trigger degradation from the change).
     
  6. MrBorland

    MrBorland Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,360
    Location:
    NC
    As far as reliability, I've seen a number of them fail (extractors & firing pins) in competition - but these are guns that're used hard. I just chucked the stock extractor and replaced it with a bomb-proof Apex extractor, and no issues to date. Still have the original FP, but I'll get an extra if I continue to use it in competition.

    As to the trigger - I'm a revolver shooter, so while others moaned and groaned about the trigger, it felt fine to me. :confused: Nonetheless, eventually, I tuned the trigger myself. I'm sure installation of Apex trigger parts is quicker and yields an excellent trigger, but it's tough to beat free, especially when the result is more than satisfactory.

    Good trigger is necessary for accuracy? It sure helps one shoot optimally. I made an assertion on an earlier thread that a good handgunner ought to be able to consistently print 3" groups at 25 yards, to which a GM-level shooter I know chimed in thinking I ought to relax that standard for polymer striker-fired guns. My M&P40 was brand new to me at the time, but I took his challenge, and the next day, with an entirely stock M&P40, shot 3 back-to-back sub-3" groups at 25 yards with it. I do better with my smooth revolvers, but this M&P, with it's factory trigger, was up to the task.

    MampP4010-24-131_zpsb5acd4eb.jpg

    MampP4010-24-132_zpsed4f2932.jpg
     
  7. Ankeny

    Ankeny Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    FWIW, our state Highway Patrol went from Glock 22s to the M&P for reasons of ergonomics. They have had so many issues with parts and reliability that they are contemplating going back to Glock. That's a pretty good sample size of folks who depend on firearms to get them home at night if things go gunny sack.

    As far as good triggers being a crutch, a good trigger doesn't necessarily mean light, but it has to be consistent, predictable, and up to the task. Frankly, I doubt there would be much difference in my scores in Production Division using a stock M&P vs. a worked over M&P trigger. Put a crunchy, inconsistent, 14 lb (think NY trigger) in an Open Division blaster and see how that works out for you. :)
     
  8. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,819
    Location:
    northern california
    That's part of the original problem, there isn't an extra 1mm...it is always there as S&W decided to use the .40 extractor on the 9mm models
     
  9. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,219
    Location:
    Georgia
    Our local city PD had been using the same 5906's for close to 20 years and needed a replacement. The chief really wanted to stay with S&W and hated Glocks. They started evaluating different guns about 4 years ago. The M&P was their 1st choice, but they had numerous reliability issues. Multiple guns were sent back. They finally gave up and explored staying with 5906's. S&W no longer catalogs them, but at least at that time would have made a run if enough were ordered. The price was just too high. In the end, after 2 years of searching they finally settled on G-17's.

    They have been in use for the last 2 years and seem well received.

    I tried one of the M&P 45's shortly after they came out. I never had any issues, and actually liked the gun fairly well. I don't hate them and hope S&W can, or has figured out what the problem was. At the end of the day I just liked Glock better and I sold the S&W.
     
  10. ritepath

    ritepath Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Messages:
    890
    Location:
    SWVA
    I held a CORE again this evening. (along with a 34,35,CZ75, 3 G20s and last but not least a p320.

    I love my Shield, I really liked my 9c but it just didn't fit my style of carry. A friend of mine will pick up his pro 9 next week. Once I get a few rounds down it, I'll know better if it's still on the short list. Right now it has the advantage of feel...
     
  11. 2ndamd

    2ndamd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    519
    Location:
    Brownsville thru El Paso
  12. tipoc

    tipoc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,911
    That's pretty funny.

    Now we need one about good triggers being just a crutch.

    tipoc
     
  13. 2ndamd

    2ndamd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    519
    Location:
    Brownsville thru El Paso
    Crutch!
    LOL!
     
  14. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,556
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    The extra 1mm I'm talking about is on the breech face which would seem to make it easier for the extractor "slip off", but it doesn't seem to happen with my 40 & 40c conversions. So I just don't see why the 9mm M&P would "often" have extractor issues as my Pro 9 certainly doesn't.
     
  15. peacebutready

    peacebutready Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    832
    Location:
    South West
    I say practice with all/most triggers. If I go to the range to shoot semi-auto, most of the time I'll at least put 25 rounds through a J-frame as well.
     
  16. peacebutready

    peacebutready Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    832
    Location:
    South West
    Any word on the .40? That's what the M&P was designed around, IIRC.
     
  17. danez71

    danez71 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,737
    Location:
    CAAZ

    That's the excuse most often offered by people that realize they didn't buy a target gun with a target trigger.


    None of the manufacturers are putting target grade triggers on non-target guns.



    Because some people like to tinker and try to make what they bought into something else that they think fits their perceived needs better.




    Oh come on now..... That's like saying that 'high performance tires and control of same is fundamental to good driving'.
     
  18. UziLand

    UziLand Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2014
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Northern Arizona
    I have two S&w MP series that I bought this year. A 4" bbl for the wife and the Pro for me. I don't know what the trigger pull is, but it feels smooth and easy to us. I sold a Taurus 40 that had a much harder trigger pull, and lousy sights. The only extraction problems I've had was when working up "light" loads. A little more powder, problem dissapears.
     
  19. LightningMan

    LightningMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,029
    In reguards to the original poster, I must be in the minority as I own 3 of them and like them quite well. I will agree with the triggers as they seem to be all over the board. My first M&P (also my carry gun) is a .40 S&W compact, and I have a full size 9mm, also a full size .40 V-TAC model. The compact has the best trigger out of the box, right at 5.5 pounds, the 9mm has a 6.25 pound pull and the higher priced V-TAC had the worst at 7.5 pounds. I put an Apex full competition trigger kit in it and now all I can say is WOW! It pull is down to 3.9 pounds. Plan on doing this with the 9mm when I can, but not with the compact as I don't want that kind of trigger on a carry gun. LM
     
  20. TestPilot

    TestPilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    976
    It's only a matter of degree.

    People may not need a "Gonden Trigger" to get the job done, but the trigger would need to be in certain parameters for one to perform the best.

    For some, like me, M&P40 trigger is within that parameters. I don't need a 1911 trigger to shoot well. But, for some it may not be. I can shoot a M642 or 380ACP pistols too, but I have no illusions that I will have the same hit rate as when I am shooting my M&P40.
     
  21. TestPilot

    TestPilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    976
    I will just mention my experience here.

    I have a bunch of M&P40's and they all work well. Only problem I had was some of them had malfunctions within the first 200 rounds due to initial part tightness.

    I cannot recommend M&P9 because ones I've shot were not as accurate as M&P40s.

    I require head shot accuracy out to 25m, that means group size must be smaller than a size of a head. M&P40 easily met that. Not so much for M&P9.
     
  22. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,665
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    Hmm ... most of our people have no trouble making head shots out to 25 meters ... or yards. Any who can't are the ones who don't tend to shoot well anyway. Perhaps the targets we use have a bigger head area than the targets you shoot? Most of our folks seem more accurate with the M&P-9 than the 40, too. Probably it's what one is most used to shooting?

    In response to a previous poster, no widespread issues known with the M&P-40.
     
  23. TestPilot

    TestPilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    976
    It cannot be my shooting skill.

    M&P40 and M&P9 are dimensionally identical, and I have no problem making that shot with M&P40. Hell, even the firing mechanism uses the exact same parts. I am an M&P armorer.


    If anything, if there is nothing wrong with the 9, I should be shooting better with it.

    I am not shooting the head size taget at 25m, I am actually shooting it at 35 yards. The standard I want it to meet is 25m, and if it hits at 35 yards, I am assuming it meets that.

    Granted, I do belive not all 9mm M&Ps are affected by the issue. However, what makes that a deal braker for me is that the rate is far higher than just a few %. What makes it a major problem is that S&W actually tells their customers 3 inch group at 7~10 yards is an acceptable standard.

    If you're wondering why this issue is not going away even when S&W was making M&P9 for near 8 years now, there is your answer: S&W REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AS A PROBLEM.

    3 inch at 7~10 yards is an unacceptable standard as far as I am concerned.

    May be not all M&P9s are affected by it, but the ones I've shot are the first guns that are difinitely not "The gun shoots better than I can."
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2014
  24. Outlaw Man

    Outlaw Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,870
    Location:
    Cleaning my guns.
    I like Sigs and S&Ws, and I don't like Glocks. Like many, though, the only complaint I have about them is their ergonomics. Sig is ultimately the same way - my thumb rests on the slide stop forcing it to be a range only gun, for me. That said, if I do my part, I can shoot either of them very well (for a self-defense pistol). The one time I shot an M&P, it was the same way. None of them have the expertly tuned 1911 trigger I'd love them to have, but they're not really supposed to, either.

    Honestly, the responses from some people in this thread seem like they expect the M&P to perform like an 8 inch-barreled Performance Center N-frame.

    Sam, I'm not calling you a liar or disputing your story (or questioning the skill of the shooters of which you're speaking), but these problems seem like something experienced by amateurs or rookies at a match - someone who hasn't run enough rounds through their gun, at a great enough speed, to know its limits. Is this problem that sporadic, or are they taking guns to matches with known problems?
     
  25. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,810
    Location:
    Central PA
    Nicely couched question. :D

    The problems seem to be very sporadic. Running in fits and starts. 2-3K perfect shots, then incessant trouble. Sometimes, as with my club president last month, he'd brought along a spare M&P, knowing the risks, and was able to finish the match. Sometimes it seems to come out of nowhere. And other times, a bit of tinkering seems to chase off the problem, but only for a while. My pal that owned 5, sent the last one back to Smith for repair, got it back, ran about 1,500 through it and it went right back to the same FTE problem. That's when he went back to the Berettas and Glocks for good.

    I can't (of course) speak for all the guys I've known who've run into these trouble patches. I do know that "sent it to the factory, got it backed and it worked for a while, now it's broke again" is something I've heard from three different shooters.

    The irony is that we shoot with a well known M&P gunsmith and it always boggles my mind that the community of local-ish IDPA/USPSA types still can't find more universal success, with such a great resource so close at hand.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page