Saddam bribed Chirac..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kestryll

member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
326
Location
People's Republik of California
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040128-094014-7323r.htm

"BAGHDAD, Iraq, Jan. 28 (UPI) -- Documents from Saddam Hussein's oil ministry reveal he used oil to bribe top French officials into opposing the imminent U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

The oil ministry papers, described by the independent Baghdad newspaper al-Mada, are apparently authentic and will become the basis of an official investigation by the new Iraqi Governing Council,......"


Anyone surpised by this?
 
Iraqi govt. papers: Saddam bribed Chirac

Is anybody truly surprised if this turns out to be 100% true?

And from the leftist Wash. Times no less...

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040128-094014-7323r.htm



Iraqi govt. papers: Saddam bribed Chirac



BAGHDAD, Iraq, Jan. 28 (UPI) -- Documents from Saddam Hussein's oil ministry reveal he used oil to bribe top French officials into opposing the imminent U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

The oil ministry papers, described by the independent Baghdad newspaper al-Mada, are apparently authentic and will become the basis of an official investigation by the new Iraqi Governing Council, the Independent reported Wednesday.

"I think the list is true," Naseer Chaderji, a governing council member, said. "I will demand an investigation. These people must be prosecuted."

Such evidence would undermine the French position before the war when President Jacques Chirac sought to couch his opposition to the invasion on a moral high ground.

A senior Bush administration official said Washington was aware of the reports but refused further comment.

French diplomats have dismissed any suggestion their foreign policy was influenced by payments from Saddam, but some European diplomats have long suspected France's steadfast opposition to the war was less moral than monetary.

"Oil runs thicker than blood," is how one former ambassador put his suspicions about the French motives for opposing action against Saddam.

Al-Mada's list cites a total of 46 individuals, companies and organizations inside and outside Iraq as receiving Saddam's oil bribes, including officials in Egypt, Jordan, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Sudan, China, Austria and France, as well as the Russian Orthodox Church, the Russian Communist Party, India's Congress Party and the Palestine Liberation Organization.
 
leftist? I think you meant the Post. the times is Reverend Moon's of the Moonies cult newspaper and is solidly slanted right.
 
I am extermely gratified that this info is coming to light. The current worldwide political standard seems to be "do whatever you can get away with". I hope this will let some politicians know "you can't get away with this".

OTOH, once the info is out, it is meaningless unless somebody gets punished or some behavior somewhere is otherwise modified.
 
Ahhh. The French. They do have their price. I wonder how much Al Qaeda paid them?
 
They're already turning on each other like cornered rats (sorry Oleg):
Former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua has denied claims that he received gifts from Saddam Hussein in return for supporting his regime.

Mr Pasqua rubbished recent reports in Iraqi newspaper al-Mada, saying he had "never received anything from Saddam Hussein, neither petrol nor money".The paper printed a list of foreigners who, it says, received oil coupons for backing an end to sanctions.

Mr Pasqua denies claims he was given 12 million barrels of crude oil.

He told French television: "I have never received any gifts from the Iraqi government and I am not in the habit of making my decisions on the basis of any remuneration I might receive.

"That is not part of my ethics or my conception of things."
Mr Pasqua denied knowing that any such transactions were taking place in the 1990s but he said it did not surprise him. This from a French Interior Minister.

"Former Interior Minister Charles Pasqua is not involved, but maybe other former ministers are involved," he said.

Anybody wonder how many times Scott Ritter's name is on that list?
 
I read the Washington Times every day, and the Washington Post about five days a week for a long time for both.

The Times is very much to the right and is pro-RKBA as far as I can tell. I find very little "moony" inference, next to none.

The Post is rabidly anti-gun owner and is quite to the left. Totally untrustworthy source of the news.

The Post does have better overall coverage in major stories than the Times has in general. But it is often slanted left.

And the Times prints stuff you will never see in the Post.

The Rev. Moon has been publishing the Times for years, and it is a financial failure. I think it has cost Moon over $100 million to publish the Times. It is a great counter weight to the left-wing Post, which was the only major newspaper published in Washington prior to the Times coming out.

The Times has a far superior Op/Ed page and Commentary sections than the Post. It has a very wide range of contributors of articles.
 
Well....I could have gotten the two papers mixed up, yaknow....

Anyhow, the story still stands.

:)
 
I was in DC on one of those high-school "See Government in Action" trips in Feb 1991. The Gulf War ended on the day we left to go back home.

The Post headline: "It's Over!"

The Times headline: "We Win!"

That told me everything I needed to know about the editorial tilt of the two papers.
 
I am shocked, I tell you. :rolleyes:

I forgot about Scott Ritter. I am sure Saddam's habibi is listed somewhere. What about McDermott and Penn?

I betcha Russia and Germany are in there too.

White House refuses to comment :scrutiny:
 
blair is for freedom, you communist dik. so we didn't have to bribe him for anything. the post is WAY left, the times is just pretty left. both are some tree hugging papers for sure
 
LOL at calling me a communist, and that's okay, cause just as I have the freedom to have my own opinions, I also have the freedom to not give a @#%! what you think. :D

J
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top