SAF: Once again, Democrats underestimated gun owner vote

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harry Tuttle

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,093
Once again, Democrats underestimated gun owner vote

By Alan Gottlieb and Joe Waldron

Democrats didn't get it and the media still doesn't. A record turnout of gun owners has once again helped shape the political landscape, this time around not only retaining control of the White House, but also reinforcing the strength of the Republican majority in both houses of Congress.

Firearms owners, including millions of hunters, were far quicker to see through the façade John Kerry and his strategists tried to build, attempting to portray the Massachusetts liberal as pro-gun and pro-hunting when his 20-year voting record belied that image. When a politician has a track record of supporting every kind of restrictive gun control scheme that lands on his desk it is impossible to reinvent that person as a hunter and shooter. It's not just that "that dog don't hunt," it's more like the dog has no legs and is blind to boot.

Whatever Sen. Kerry was thinking when he showed up at a canned pheasant hunt in Iowa, a shooting range in Wisconsin and more recently on a photo-op goose shoot in Ohio, if he actually believed these publicity stunts would gain him acceptance from a voting block he has consistently acted against, it would indicate he was not capable of being president of the United States. Nobody that stupid should be in the Oval Office.

Democrats are now faced, once again, with the task of reassessment. On this last go-round, they believed that portraying themselves as pro-gun and pro-hunting would apparently make it so "to the dumb bumpkins." The plain truth is that Democrats, as a party, and as individuals, do not understand that one does not earn points in the gun and hunting community by claiming to be something. One has to honestly live those beliefs.

Adopting a strategy of telling people you "support the Second Amendment" really says nothing. At this year's Gun Rights Policy Conference – a late September gathering of gun rights leaders held in Arlington, Virginia – it was more than skepticism that led many of those present to observe that merely "supporting" the Second Amendment could mean anything, and most likely translates to accepting the ridiculous notion that the amendment applies to a mythical "collective right" of states to form militias.

Tens of millions of American gun owners know that to be hogwash. The right to keep and bear arms is an individual right. Until Democrats step up to the plate and say so, demonstrating in the process that they mean it, that important block of voting gun owners will continue to take its votes elsewhere.

Likewise, Democrats need to publicly acknowledge that – despite the claims of organizations that pander gun control as gun "safety" – gun control laws have not worked. The time has come to repeal some of these onerous laws, and stop treating gun owners like criminals.

Law-abiding American citizens should be able to own any kind of firearm they want, and Democrats need to accept this. People should be punished for misusing guns, not penalized for exercising a constitutional right. So long as Democrats think otherwise, they will never again be embraced as a party by gun owners.

Curiously, the media continues to largely ignore the gun vote phenomenon. Obviously, the press does not understand that gun owners may disagree among themselves on various social and political issues and levels. That happens in any "family." But like a family, gun owners come together forcefully when they see their fundamental right to own firearms threatened, and John Kerry – with his anti-gun voting record – embodied that threat.

Gun owners and especially hunters are typically a solitary lot. They prefer to be left alone. But like the proverbial sleeping giant, there can be nasty consequences when the firearms fraternity is awakened. It acts with deliberation and decisiveness. Democrats first learned this in 1994, and they've been reminded about it every two years since.

One would think that by now the party would have gotten the message.


Alan Gottlieb is founder of the Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org). Joe Waldron is executive director of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (www.ccrkba.org)


-END-
 
One would think that by now the party would have gotten the message.
Nope. Look who they're most likely to nominate next time - Hillery.

She can't even pretend to like hunting. I doubt she's even fired a gun in her whole life. A naked gun confiscator, she'll unify the gun folks like no other could.
 
Nope. Look who they're most likely to nominate next time - Hillery.

Four years is a long time. And i think the Democrats might have gotten a bit of a shock this time around. They managed to lose on all fronts despite the support of the ENTIRE media and entertainment industries. I think they may be rethinking their strategies right now. We may see something very different next time around.
 
Nope. Look who they're most likely to nominate next time - Hillery.

wrong. the rank and file are pissed at the leadership for blowing it. Howard Dean is going to take over the party from within. They're starting to understand what he meant when he said "I want to be the candidate of the white southerner with a confederate flag on his pickup truck". He built the PAC to do it, and the DNC/DLC is not long for this world.

They can see the electoral map too, and they know next time they don't win Wisconsin or Michigan unless their is a major shift in focus.

Democrats are doing a post 1964 Goldwater Republican. Pull back, take a HARD LOOK, figure it out, and re-adjust.

The hardcore abortionists and gay rights bloc is going to be cut out of the party kicking and screaming.
 
Unfortunately, The Democratic Party leadership has no more control over the stand taken on Gun Control by its membership than they have over the weather. The Hollywood crowd along with 99.9% of the Media have decided that Guns are the root of all that is evil, and it is their sacred duty to do all in their power to eliminate same, After all "Its for the Children".

The rank and file Democrat ( notably minorities, Union members, and the mothers milk of the party, the professional welfare receipients) have been so brainwashed into believeing that only the Democrat party is looking out for their interests that as we used to say in Louisiana, When you go vote, just "Pull the Roosters Tail," (This used to be the symbol of the Party years ago) never mind that Gun Control is as repugnant to them as it is to us.

My personal feeling is that there was mass defection among Conservative gun owning Democrats who held their noses and voted for Bush strictly on the issue of Gun Control.
 
I agree...

I think the defeat of sKerry was so profound - and especially the Repubs PICKING UP seats in the Congress - that some major changes will come from the Dims.

I think they're learning that the limosine liberal thing just isn't going to win elections any more.

It has the effect of pulling the Demos right over time; the extemists will still be there, but not as visible.

I hope they are getting it 5x9.
 
Nov 3rd, I did hear pundits and talking heads admit guns were a big factor, as the people outside the far left coast and New England LIEberals are more liekly to be gun owners.....like all of us Heartland voters who put Bush over the top and back in charge.
Now, sir, repayment can be a repeal of 86 machine Gun Ban, GCA of 68, or NFA of 34, or any combo thereof....
 
They didn't learn when the gun vote defeated Gore, they won't learn it for '08 either.

It's part of their dogma, a key part in their plans to make America a socialist country. They can piss and moan over it, try to hide it, but in the end they will always go back to it. It's in their nature.
 
They still don't get it.

Over at DU they are already starting to rationalize that they lost the election because:

"Karl Rove appealed to the "Fundie Bigots" that hate gays"

"The Diebold voting machine people rigged the software"

"They threw away thousands of ballots for Kerry in Ohio"

Just about everything short of, "My dog ate my ballot" or "My little brother spilled hot chocolate on it".

In the gun related forums they are trying to figure out how to "look more attractive or at least less threatening to "The Gun Nuts" that vote (actual quote). Not about how to actually change their party and get rid of, or at least marginalize, Feinstien, Schumer.

They still think it's about style and not the substance.

I'd love to see someone in the DNC actually come out and say:

"You know what, look at all these red counties, even in states we won. Maybe we are out of step with the majority of Americans and what they believe. Dammit, we should spend less time listening to characters like Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, Ben Affleck, Jesse Jackson and the like and more time listening to the guy who drives the FedEx truck or handles insurance claims and their neighbors. Might even be a good idea to go to church once in a while too, beyond showing up in a few black churches the week before an election."

"Nah! Let's do what Nancy Pelosi says, get our leftist message out louder and more shrill. After all San Francisco is just like Sandusky Ohio, right?"

Sarcasm aside, I do not hold out much hope for them pulling their collective heads from a deep dark place anytime soon. They are deep in denial and eager to assign the blame.

Besides, "Soul Searching" by definition requires the belief in a G-- and a soul in the first place, doesn't it? They are too busy getting those evil nativity scenes and ten commandments out of public view to think about their souls, if they ever really believed they had one that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top