San Francisco has lost its mind-rejects the Iowa!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tropical Z

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
1,552
Location
The path less chosen...
Retired USS Iowa Headed Inland After San Francisco's Antiwar Rejection
By Brian Skoloff Associated Press Writer
Published: Aug 20, 2005


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The USS Iowa joined in battles from World War II to Korea to the Persian Gulf. It carried President Franklin Roosevelt home from the Teheran conference of allied leaders, and four decades later, suffered one of the nation's most deadly military accidents.

Veterans groups and history buffs had hoped that tourists in San Francisco could walk the same teak decks where sailors dodged Japanese machine-gun fire and fired 16-inch guns that helped win battles across the South Pacific.

Instead, it appears that the retired battleship is headed about 80 miles inland, to Stockton, a gritty agricultural port town on the San Joaquin River and home of California's annual asparagus festival.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., :cuss: a former San Francisco mayor, helped secure $3 million to tow the Iowa from Rhode Island to the Bay Area in 2001 in hopes of making touristy Fisherman's Wharf its new home.

But city supervisors voted 8-3 last month to oppose taking in the ship, citing local opposition to the Iraq war and the military's stance on gays, among other things.

"If I was going to commit any kind of money in recognition of war, then it should be toward peace, given what our war is in Iraq right now," Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi said.


Feinstein called it a "very petty decision."
"This isn't the San Francisco that I've known and loved and grew up in and was born in," Feinstein said.

San Francisco's maritime museum already has one military vessel - the USS Pampanito, an attack submarine that sank six Japanese ships during World War II and has about 110,000 visitors a year.

Officials in Stockton couldn't be happier. They've offered a dock on the river, a 90,000-square-foot waterfront building and a parking area, and hope to attract at least 125,000 annual visitors.

After the Korean war, the Iowa was decommissioned and placed in reserve in a Philadelphia shipyard for three decades. In 1988, it was recalled to duty escorting oil supply ships safely in and out danger in the Persian Gulf. In 1989, 47 sailors were killed in an explosion that tore through a gun turret during a training exercise.

The warship, decommissioned by the Navy in 1990, is currently anchored with a mothballed fleet in Suisun Bay, near the mouth of the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta.

San Francisco's rejection of such a storied battleship is a slap in the nation's face, said Douglass Wilhoit, head of Stockton's Chamber of Commerce.
"We're lucky our men and women have sacrificed their lives ... to protect our freedom," Wilhoit said. "Wherever you stand on the war in Iraq ... you shouldn't make a decision based on philosophy."

Rep. Richard W. Pombo, R-Calif., has sponsored legislation authorizing the ship's permanent move to Stockton. Feinstein has countered with a bill to open bidding to any California city.

The two versions will have to be reconciled by a House-Senate conference committee considering the Pentagon spending bill.
 
More evidence that the prevailing winds blow from the direction of the People's Republic of Berzerkley. Those folks out there show all the intellectual competency of a mouse in heat...

Art
 
I do not understand how a State can refuse a Federal naval ship. San Francisco basically owes its existence to the Navy yet they can simply say "no"?

If so, why can't the states simply say "no" to Federal gun laws?

Sounds like a double-standard to me... :mad:
 
The Reagan is in my town this weekend. The city was demanding that the US Navy pay them $30,000 for the privilege of dropping anchor and allowing sailors shore leave. After they were made to look ridiculous (several people volunteered to pay the $30K themselves because they were so embarassed by the city) they gave in and dropped the extortion demand.

As commie as it is here (Santa Barbara) it was amazing to see the flak the city got from residents of the region. Just goes to show there is still a big silent population of common sense people around, that given the right circumstances, can speak up and make a difference.

Most people were figuring city businesses would be taking in around $30K every few hours the ship was in from a combination of shore leave, visiting family, and tourists wanting to take a gander.
 
The Reagan is in my town this weekend. The city was demanding that the US Navy pay them $30,000 for the privilege of dropping anchor and allowing sailors shore leave.
"Oops! Sorry about the ND! But think of the benefits--now you can build a nice, modern City Hall!"
 
Move the ship to Corpus Christi and tell the bottom feeders in SF to go screw themselves........... ! :cuss:
 
American leftists have finally proven it....

They are quite simply insane.

These aren't a group of UFO-seeing freaks who've clustered in a ditch in Texas to protest.

These are ELECTED CITY OFFICIALS.

They are nuts. They are insane.

They are not worth debating with.

They are just <flat-out> crazy.

hillbilly
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was aboard the USS IOWA back in the mid-1980's when she visited NYC. Nice boat.

Anyway, it appears from the article that San Fransico would have to pay for the USS IOWA to dock there. So the taxpayers of SF, and maybe California, would be saddled with the expenses.

The USS NEW JERSEY operates at a $1,000,000 loss per year. Visitor numbers are about half of what was expected. To make up the difference, the USS NEW JERSEY wants funding from the state. I don't want my tax dollars going to the USS NEW JERSEY. Either it sinks or swims on its own, not with my tax help.

Same for the USS IOWA.
 
You know you're too far left when not even Feinstein will stand by you :D

It's so sad it's funny. Here's hoping they've done something now that will wake up the sleeping masses out there...if there are any. Send the slimes packing.
 
Good move. San Francisco is trash. Bums, addicts and whores urinating and defecating in the streets. Literally, there was an article about "sticky" streets and sidewalks just from this. Yet the idiot city supervisors rejected outlawing such practices because (since they are nothing but useless, wasted, ex-hippy baby boomers themselves who were too stupid to find a real job when they lost the revolution) such was discriminatory.

Militant panhandlers accosting you when you go into and out of nice restaurants. Wasted societal rejects everywhere. And this is particularly true of the area where they proposed moving the Iowa.

It's a good thing the Iowa will be in America, not in San Fran. And all of our High Roader/pro gun brethren should do likewise.
 
We had a similar fight here in Milwaukee last spring. Some folks wanted the USS Des Moines docked on the lakefront near the War Memorial Center. But the opponents, who said it would be an eyesore, won out.
 
Feinstein called it a "very petty decision."
"This isn't the San Francisco that I've known and loved and grew up in and was born in," Feinstein said.

MikeIsaj said:
No, it's the city you helped create as mayor.

Ahh ya beat me to it! Darn straight.

And I'm leaving this beautiful, screwed up city because of it.
 
Sounds to me like SF just checked out from the rest of the US.


As for the USS NJ:

The USS NEW JERSEY operates at a $1,000,000 loss per year. Visitor numbers are about half of what was expected. To make up the difference, the USS NEW JERSEY wants funding from the state. I don't want my tax dollars going to the USS NEW JERSEY. Either it sinks or swims on its own, not with my tax help.

The <dummies> docked the ship in CAMDEN, which regularly rates in the top 5 murderopolises, an astounding achievement for such a small and empty city.

Furthermore, the last time I checked, you pretty much have to make an appointment to go on a short tour of the ship, my understanding is that your really don't get to see much.

It's almost like they've gone out of their way to make the experience as uninviting as possible, in full accordance with nanny statist doctrine.



When I was a kid, we toured the Massachussetts, docked in Fall River. IIRC, you bought a ticket near the gangway, and after that, you could pretty much wander around at will, participating in the organized tour as you saw fit.

The biggest hoot of that was sitting in the AA guns, which would still swivel around. In our 10 year old imaginations, we shot down hordes of kamikazes, and blew the heck out of the Fall River bridge.


{thx Art. Apologies to yer grammaw}
 
Last edited:
Every time

I think my state (NY) has hit rock bottom, I see something like this...and feel a little better....
 
Retired USS Iowa Headed Inland After San Francisco's Antiwar Rejection
By Brian Skoloff Associated Press Writer
Published: Aug 20, 2005


I think it's great!

A man-of-war with the proud history and tradition of the USS Iowa shouln't be wasted on the subjects of San Fransicko
 
Check the following link; it's an editorial written by my mailman who also happens to be my neighbor. He sent an angry letter to the Examiner and they used it for a guest editorial, with his permission.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/07/14/opinion/20050714_op03_viewpoint.txt

As soon as I retire I'm leaving San Francisco. One of the few things I'll miss besides the great restaurants is folks like Mike.

Best,
Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top