You are attempting to expand the ruling by cherry picking Justice Scalia comments.
See comments below.
Actually I have read a lot of it although not all of it. Heller is over 600 pages long. How much of it have you read?
Thank you for your comments. It is obvious that you have taken time to study the Heller decision.
As you note Heller is a very narrow decision focusing only on the right to own a handgun in a persons home. It is not the big expansion victory many gun owners believe it is.
For those who have not taken the time to actually research and read Heller here are the relevant comments in Justice Scalia’s opinion;
“nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”
“We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms.
Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those "in common use at the time.’ 307 U. S., at 179. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”
“like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” It is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
http://www.scotusblog.com/2008/06/heller-quotes-from-the-majority/