In my opinion, the LWS-32 Seecamp is "worth it" as a defensive pistol, for its niche. The .380 version, however, is not "worth" the increased cost, to me, because I am not a collector. I see the Seecamp .380 as more of a collectible. Seecamps are very well-made, and are personally backed by a very accessible and responsive maker.
The LWS-32's niche, as I see it, is the similar to that of the small .22 pistol, as described by the late Col. Jeff Cooper: "I have a gun. Leave me alone." I would not choose such a small
weapon for general gun-fighting duties. As a peace officer, my responsibility to society is to be "subject to duty at all times." I pack heavy most of the time. A Seecamp, to me, is a
tertiary weapon, or a special-circumstances weapon. Depending upon the environment, I usually pack handguns chambered for .357 Magnum, .45 ACP, and/or .40 S&W, the latter being my mandated primary duty cartridge. Your needs may vary.
I should add that some folks feel that the substantial felt recoil of a .380 Seecamp takes it
out of the realm of practicality as a defensive weapon. I have not fired the .380 version, so
cannot address that part. When recoil makes it difficult to maintain a proper firing grip, or recover from recoil to fire another shot, however, I feel it is time to change something in the equation, as one should balance accuracy, power, and speed.