seems like something of a stretch for Patriot Act application

Status
Not open for further replies.

alan

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,601
Location
sowest pa.
How, pray tell, was the "fate of the nation" involved, or where hides "terrorism"??

CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION: LV FBI used anti-terrorism law

Defense attorney, ACLU say inquiry outside the purview of USA Patriot Act

By J.M. KALIL
REVIEW-JOURNAL





The FBI used the USA Patriot Act to obtain financial information about key figures in its ongoing political corruption probe centered on strip club magnate Michael Galardi, federal authorities confirmed Monday.

Investigators "used a section of the Patriot Act to get subpoenas for financial documents," said Special Agent Jim Stern, a spokesman for the Las Vegas field office of the FBI. "It was used appropriately by the FBI and was clearly within the legal parameters of the statute."

One source said two Las Vegas stockbrokers received faxed subpoenas on Oct. 28 asking for records for many of those who have been identified as either a target or subject of the investigation.

That list includes Galardi, the owner of Jaguars and Cheetah's topless clubs; his lobbyist, former Clark County Commissioner Lance Malone; former Commissioner Erin Kenny; County Commission Chairwoman Mary Kincaid-Chauncey; former County Commission Chairman Dario Herrera; and Las Vegas City Councilman Michael McDonald, who was defeated for re-election in June.

A second source confirmed that stockbrokers had been faxed subpoenas asking for information on Galardi, Malone, Kenny, Kincaid-Chauncey, Herrera, McDonald and and at least one of the former politicians' spouses.

The second source said the subpoena appeared to be a search for hidden proceeds that could be used as evidence of bribery in the case.

A source also indicated that records on Las Vegas City Councilman Michael Mack were also sought. Reached Monday, Mack declined to comment on the matter.

The Patriot Act, passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, was originally trumpeted by the government as a powerful tool that would assist federal law enforcement officials in combating and preventing terrorism.

But the Bush administration has increasingly attracted criticism from civil libertarians for employing the wide-ranging act to crack down on everything from drug traffickers to child pornographers.

The provision used to obtain the information in the Galardi investigation is Section 314, sources said.

That section allows federal investigators to obtain information from any financial institution regarding the accounts of people suspected of being terrorists or laundering money.

Malone's attorney said it is an outrage that the FBI is using anti-terrorism measures in an effort to gather information on his client.

"The Patriot Act was designed and was sold to the American people as being necessary to combat terrorism. It clearly was not intended for this," Las Vegas attorney Dominic Gentile said. "I'm confident that the citizens of the United States are on my side on this one."

Civil libertarians agreed.

"We at the ACLU have said from the beginning that the Patriot Act included provisions that the government sought for years that in no way had anything to do with the threat of terrorism, but could help them in your more garden variety criminal prosecutions," said Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.

Because use of the Patriot Act in nonterrorism related probes is controversial, local FBI investigators sought approval from the top echelons of the Justice Department before using it, one source confirmed.

That source said agents proceeded only after receiving express permission from FBI headquarters and the office of the U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C.

Law enforcement agents seeking financial records typically seek subpoenas through the U.S. Attorney's office and must submit evidence such as a sworn affidavit that establishes probable cause of a crime.

The provisions of the Patriot Act require fewer elements of evidence to establish probable cause to obtain such records.

"They wouldn't do it unless that was the only way they could get the information," one source said.

Besides that lower threshold, a request made under the Patriot Act rather than a typical subpoena can yield a wider scope of documents.

Attorney Richard Wright, who represents both Mack and McDonald, said he was unaware investigators had used Patriot Act powers.

"It isn't anything that's lawfully known," he said.

Federal authorities in San Diego say Galardi and Malone paid San Diego city officials to lift a ban on contact between topless dancers and their customers. Malone and three San Diego city councilmen await trial on public corruption charges.

A federal grand jury in Las Vegas also has been hearing evidence regarding allegations of public corruption in Southern Nevada, but prosecutors have announced no indictment in that case.

However, two of the key figures who search warrants identified as targets of the case now appear to have already pleaded guilty and are cooperating with the investigation.

Kenny was named as a defendant in a sealed criminal case filed in federal court in July. She has told friends she is cooperating with federal officials.

The Review-Journal reported late last month that Galardi has pleaded guilty during secret proceedings before U.S. District Judge James Mahan, but exact charges remain unknown.


Review-Journal staff writer Michael Squires contributed to this report.
 
And you're surprised? How long did it take before they were using RICO for other things. Terrorism was only the excuse....

Jeff
 
I posted this on another board a while back:

Anyone know what Jose Padilla is up to these days? He could very well be a terrorist. I don't know. There's never been evidence presented on it. What I do know is that he is an American citizen who has been detained indefinately without an attorney, trial or any charges being brought and that is beyond unacceptable to me. If we have evidence he was plotting mass destruction, fine..give him a lawyer, present the evidence, prove his guilt and kill him. Unless or until then, the government should use the Constitution as a basis for a system of government and not a handy piece of paper to wipe their backsides with.

Padilla's probably being held in the Ministry of Love.
 
The patriot Act being used outside of the scope of terrorism investigations? No way! :rolleyes:

I found an old TFL post of mine from October 2001, when all the Bush fans were waving their pom-poms for the just-announced USA PATRIOT act:

If you hand them this power today, do not think for one second that they won't use it against you tomorrow. Some nutcase will start another Oklahoma City-like incident, and then those new laws will be expanded so that U.S. citizens may be held indefinitely as well if they're suspected terrorists. Scare the sheeple enough, and they'll gladly hand that power to the Feds. You give them what they want today because everybody is caught up in anti-Arab and terrorism fever, and you'll be surprised to find that the bomb-sniffing dog of today is the gun-sniffing dog of tomorrow in the fight against "domestic terrorism" (you know, those right-wing gun nuts.)

Do you believe their promise that they will only use these powers against terrorists? Or do you have a vague idea that they will just expand the definition of terrorism once they have all those legal powers?

Ask yourself this: Has the federal government ever made unwise use of its police powers? Has it ever used the powers granted to it against its own citizens? More importantly, can you point out an instance where such sweeping police power was used wisely and in balance with civil rights?
 
This Patriot Act caused this country to take a gigantic step backward in freedom. It may prove to be the end of life as we know it in this country.

This is not news to me however, I saw this coming from the beginning. That didn't take any kind of psychic to see that.
 
While some have spoken out against this abomination, even some "congress critters", belatedly, after the fact, and after having vote for passage of the above mentioned abomination, the really sad thing, dangerous too, is the following, or so it seems to me.

That the vast majority of the people stand mute, like the SHEEPLE that they are, and that by the way, is putting a favorable face on the thing.
 
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/6046311.htm
Padilla is, or was as of last summer, being held in a naval brig in South Carolina. Nobody knows if he knows he has a lawyer. His lawyer's letters are not guaranteed to be delivered. The last federal judge to take up the issue said he must be given a lawyer, but Bush and Ashcroft ignored that. They asked the judge to reconsider and the judge refused. It's now on appeal before the 2nd Circuit, and they seem to be taking their sweet time:
http://www.state.de.us/cjc/padilla.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top