Self Defense Shooting in DE Jury trial, results in acquittal of shooter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
5,687
Location
Delaware home of tax free shopping
I thought this might be an interesting read for members of the Board.


Burris acquitted of murder
'It's not fair,' victim's mother says
By ESTEBAN PARRA
Staff reporter
09/06/2003

A 52-year-old man who said he was defending himself last year when he shot into an approaching crowd, killing a teen and wounding another man, was acquitted of all charges Friday by a Superior Court jury.

Family members, some with tears in their eyes, others clenching fists to their faces, breathed a sigh of relief as the jury forewoman read the verdict. The decision cleared Robert Burris Sr. of first-degree murder, attempted murder and two weapons charges.

"I was scared that he wasn't coming home," Burris' son, Robert Jr., said outside the courtroom.

Defense attorney John S. Malik argued for five weeks that Burris was acting in self-defense when he fired his .22-caliber rifle on June 17, 2002, killing Richard "Digger" Hayton and wounding Ed Stranahan, who was then 19.

State prosecutors argued that Burris intentionally killed the 17-year-old because he took the time to find a spot from which he could "ambush" the crowd minutes before the group even approached.

Jurors, who were on their third day of deliberations, read their verdict about 1:20 p.m. After the reading, Malik wiped tears from his eyes with a tissue. "I was emotionally shaken with the verdict in a happy way," he said. "It's one I'll never forget."

State prosecutor Donald R. Roberts walked over to Burris and wished him luck as he shook his hand. "The jury did what the jury was supposed to do," Roberts said outside the courtroom.

Hayton's mother said she was not pleased by the jury's verdict. "It's like my son and his way of being didn't even matter," Jeri L. Hayton said. "It's not fair to my son." She added that her son was a good, hardworking boy, who only went to Holloway Terrace because a friend was going.

"Now I have to live in the same neighborhood as the man who killed my son," Jeri Hayton said. The Haytons live about eight streets away from Burris.

Burris and Stranahan had gotten into an argument last year when Burris and four others went to Stranahan's house near New Castle, thinking the engine of Burris' son's all-terrain vehicle might be there.

Stranahan found Burris in his garage and, during the subsequent altercation, Burris said, Stranahan threatened to kill him and his family and burn down their house.

Stranahan, who repeatedly dozed off during his testimony, denied the threat. Others at the scene also said they did not hear it. (not mentioned that they also said they were too far away to hear what was said) After the fight, Burris and his group left. But Stranahan, aided by friends, chased Burris and the two groups fought again, according to testimony.

Burris testified that when he returned home, cars with people screaming and hanging out windows drove past his house. Afraid Stranahan would follow through with the alleged threat, Burris testified, he armed himself with a .22-caliber rifle.

As a crowd of about 20 approached his home, Burris said, he warned them that he had a gun. The crowd continued to make threats, Burris said, and objects were thrown.

He said he heard popping sounds and events became a "blur." The next thing he recalled was that the rifle's receiver was empty.

After the trial, Burris' family members made cell-phone calls and hugged each other outside the courtroom saying "Uncle Bobby's coming home."

"I'm just happy. That's all," said Burris' wife, Cathy Booth. She later hugged Malik and said: "Thank you, Mr. Malik, even though I cussed you out a million times."
 
A .22?! Some people sure need to read the caliber arguments in the rifle forum. :evil:

Kharn
 
Sounds like Burris met the requirements for "retreat"
I don't think so. You are obligated to retreat if you can do so SAFELY. Just being able to easily run away doesn't make that a safe retreat. You can be shot down, outrunned...who knows.

You have a gun, you tell a crowd to stop approaching, and they continue anyway??? Sounds like a justified act to me...

However, I think Burris should get in trouble for trespassing at least.
 
"However, I think Burris should get in trouble for trespassing at least."

?? After retreating to his own home and defending himself from there....trespassing ?

Sam
 
?? After retreating to his own home and defending himself from there....trespassing ?
Am I reading this wrong? I thought the whole thing started because Burris was rumaging in Stranahan's garage looking for a stolen (I guess) engine.
Burris and Stranahan had gotten into an argument last year when Burris and four others went to Stranahan's house near New Castle, thinking the engine of Burris' son's all-terrain vehicle might be there.

Stranahan found Burris in his garage and, ...
 
Hmmm...
Two fights in two locations...
Plus the mob and shooting appearantly a third altercation at, possibly, a third location.
Just werent no quit in them boyahs.

Re Trespass....
Guess if Stranahan had complained of trespass rather than gettin directly into a word and blow swappin at the outset, could be that trespass would have stuck on Burris.

Graystar...thanks, now have reread it several times.

And wonder what really happened....

Sam
 
I would like to know how much this guys legal defense cost him. Article said that his attorney argued for five weeks.
 
She added that her son was a good, hardworking boy, who only went to Holloway Terrace because a friend was going.
I guess all those times you asked him "If everyone else is jumping off of a bridge ..." didn't take.
Defense attorney John S. Malik argued for five weeks ...
Five weeks? Five weeks? They took up FIVE WEEKS of precious court time on THIS case?!?!?
:banghead: :fire: :banghead:
 
In Delaware the test for justifiable self defense is did you fear for your life? If so deadly force is justified

There is no duty in DE law to retreat, but it is assumed that you will take reasonable action to avoid the situation, what ever that means. Your home is considered your castle and you can take all necessary means to defend it.

The AG thought that there was some question as to wether Burris took reasonable care to avoid the situation.

In this case it appears that he preciptated the fight and the mob attack/ gathering at his house. When they thought that the engine was in Stranahan's garage they should have called the police, not gone lookin for trouble, I never did read whether Strannahan stole the engine or Burris was mistaken.

The jury decided that Burris did fear for his life and he took reasonable action to defend it given the mob attack on his residence, so he was acquitted, It could have gone the other way.

The part that made me wonder though was his statement thet he was basically not aiming and just firing into the crowd, he did however hit the instigators it would seem.

A situation that could have been avoided IMHO.

In many other states this gent might be headed for jail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top