ol' scratch
Member
Hello everybody,
Ok, I was just curious about this; particularly after watching an episode of Penn and Tellers’ BS (I didn’t want to get flagged. The name is actually the written out form). They had a great piece on the 2nd amendment. One anti-gunner stat I hear a lot is that 40-50 percent of people who have a firearm in their home for personal defense accidentally shoot a loved one. The percentage of people fluctuates. Most recently, I heard a police chief rattle off 47 percent.
The episode of BS gave a different spin on the stat. It says even if the stat is creditable, there are many instances where people have used firearms to deter a would be attacker and never fired a shot.
I have a deep rooted hatred of statistics. When I was working on my Bachelor’s while attending school in Michigan, a professor told me to read a book titled, Damn Lies and Statistics- Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists, by Joe Best. This book helped me realize that stats can and are used to mislead. I question all stats, even the stats that help prove a point I agree with.
I would like to know how many people have used a firearm to defend themselves without ever firing a shot. I will start with my story.
I had been working in my garage on a now forgotten project. My neighbors at the time were in their 70s and very sweet people. I was surprised when I heard speed metal blaring from a car that pulled into their driveway. I heard the engine cut off and a car door slam. A man in his 50s got out of the car with a sledge hammer. He instantly started smashing my neighbors’ garage with the sledge. I yelled, “What the **** are you doing?” He yelled back, “(neighbor’s name) has my ****ing train! I want it back!” I replied, “I don’t know anything about that, but you aren’t going to smash up his garage!”
At that point, the man with the hammer walked very quickly across the two yards proclaiming that I wasn’t going to tell him what to do. When he crossed the property line I said, “That’s it! I am going to get my ****ing gun!” I ran in the house with him in hot pursuit. I locked the door, ran up stairs, and grabbed (at the time) my SKS which was at the ready. It could be argued that an SKS is not the best choice for home defense, but it was what I had at the time. I did have the presence of mind to pick up safety rounds.
While I walked out into the yard with my cell phone to call the police, my wife covered me from a window. The goof ball with the hammer no longer had his weapon, but he was forcefully trying to remove my neighbor from his home. The police came a few minutes after that. Their response time was amazing.
While everything was going on, the man with the hammer had apparently taken my threat very seriously. He had thrown the hammer in my yard. My neighbor didn’t even know his garage had been damaged until I told him. He then realized the gravity of the situation.
The man with the hammer was a meth addict who was coming down. He remembered that my neighbor had a Lionel train he had lay claim to when he was a kid. Things had changed and he was a convicted felon who couldn’t purchase a firearm. He was coming to get the train presumably to buy more drugs. To this day, I think he would have pulled my neighbor out of his house and bludgeoned him to death if I hadn’t threatened him. Even though the police came in no time flat, I still think he would have killed my neighbor before they would have reached him.
I know there are people who have used firearms in self-defense and had to fire shots. I am curious about the people who have never had to fire a shot. I think a lot of crime is thwarted with just the threat that someone has a gun.
Ok, I was just curious about this; particularly after watching an episode of Penn and Tellers’ BS (I didn’t want to get flagged. The name is actually the written out form). They had a great piece on the 2nd amendment. One anti-gunner stat I hear a lot is that 40-50 percent of people who have a firearm in their home for personal defense accidentally shoot a loved one. The percentage of people fluctuates. Most recently, I heard a police chief rattle off 47 percent.
The episode of BS gave a different spin on the stat. It says even if the stat is creditable, there are many instances where people have used firearms to deter a would be attacker and never fired a shot.
I have a deep rooted hatred of statistics. When I was working on my Bachelor’s while attending school in Michigan, a professor told me to read a book titled, Damn Lies and Statistics- Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists, by Joe Best. This book helped me realize that stats can and are used to mislead. I question all stats, even the stats that help prove a point I agree with.
I would like to know how many people have used a firearm to defend themselves without ever firing a shot. I will start with my story.
I had been working in my garage on a now forgotten project. My neighbors at the time were in their 70s and very sweet people. I was surprised when I heard speed metal blaring from a car that pulled into their driveway. I heard the engine cut off and a car door slam. A man in his 50s got out of the car with a sledge hammer. He instantly started smashing my neighbors’ garage with the sledge. I yelled, “What the **** are you doing?” He yelled back, “(neighbor’s name) has my ****ing train! I want it back!” I replied, “I don’t know anything about that, but you aren’t going to smash up his garage!”
At that point, the man with the hammer walked very quickly across the two yards proclaiming that I wasn’t going to tell him what to do. When he crossed the property line I said, “That’s it! I am going to get my ****ing gun!” I ran in the house with him in hot pursuit. I locked the door, ran up stairs, and grabbed (at the time) my SKS which was at the ready. It could be argued that an SKS is not the best choice for home defense, but it was what I had at the time. I did have the presence of mind to pick up safety rounds.
While I walked out into the yard with my cell phone to call the police, my wife covered me from a window. The goof ball with the hammer no longer had his weapon, but he was forcefully trying to remove my neighbor from his home. The police came a few minutes after that. Their response time was amazing.
While everything was going on, the man with the hammer had apparently taken my threat very seriously. He had thrown the hammer in my yard. My neighbor didn’t even know his garage had been damaged until I told him. He then realized the gravity of the situation.
The man with the hammer was a meth addict who was coming down. He remembered that my neighbor had a Lionel train he had lay claim to when he was a kid. Things had changed and he was a convicted felon who couldn’t purchase a firearm. He was coming to get the train presumably to buy more drugs. To this day, I think he would have pulled my neighbor out of his house and bludgeoned him to death if I hadn’t threatened him. Even though the police came in no time flat, I still think he would have killed my neighbor before they would have reached him.
I know there are people who have used firearms in self-defense and had to fire shots. I am curious about the people who have never had to fire a shot. I think a lot of crime is thwarted with just the threat that someone has a gun.