Senator Cornyn Response

Status
Not open for further replies.

browningguy

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2004
Messages
4,728
Location
Houston, TX
I sent an email to the Senator a couple of weeks ago concerning new gun restrictions, and just wanted to share his response.

Dear xxx:

Thank you for contacting me regarding federal firearms laws. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter.

As a strong proponent of the Second Amendment, I believe it is essential to safeguard the law-abiding citizen's constitutional right to own and use firearms designed for legitimate purposes such as hunting, target shooting, collecting, and self-protection. Restricting this right runs counter to the intent of our Founding Fathers, who expressly guaranteed that citizens would retain the right to keep and bear arms.

It is encouraging that the Supreme Court has upheld the will of our Founders and re-affirmed the ideals our country was established upon. The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller provides a greater guarantee that Americans' Constitutional rights remain secure from federal government intrusion. I was proud to sign an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in that case stating an individual’s right to bear arms is fundamental. This historic ruling continues to have implications far beyond the District of Columbia. In 2010, the Supreme Court decided in McDonald v. City of Chicago to strike down the arbitrary gun ban in Chicago—and thereby affirm that the Second Amendment safeguards against state and local encroachments on the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.

As a former Texas Supreme Court Justice and Attorney General, I have firsthand knowledge of crime-fighting policies that work, and I believe that citizens' Second Amendment rights should not be restricted because of the actions of criminals. Rather, we must focus our attention on the source of violent crime: criminals who use firearms to commit crimes. I believe that strictly enforcing the law—and meting out tougher sentences for career criminals and those who use firearms when committing crimes—will reduce crime more effectively than gun or equipment bans, which primarily serve to take firearms away from law-abiding citizens.

I appreciate the opportunity to represent Texans in the United States Senate, and you may be certain that I will continue working with my colleagues to protect our Second Amendment rights. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.

Sincerely,
JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
 
I got the same reply and don't care that it's a form letter, just happy he's pro gun.
 
I got this same one. This is much better than the first response he sent out, which was a little wishy washy. I think this "revised" response is due to him getting bombarded with negative comments on the first one.
 
I sent emailed him around the end of last year, so it took almost a month for him to respond.
 
Sounds like he's on board. Keep reminding him though that he has supporters and you fully expect him to uphold our Rights and not to compromise.
 
Sen. Cornyn is very pro gun and is a good man to boot. A few years ago I was having a set-to with ATF over my FFL renewal. I had held my license for 30 years but they were stonewalling me on my renewal. An e-mail to Sen. Cornyn brought a quick response from his office and a renewed license in quick order. I gathered he was not a big fan of the ATF.
 
Sen. Cornyn said:
... I believe it is essential to safeguard the law-abiding citizen's constitutional right to own and use firearms designed for legitimate purposes such as hunting, target shooting, collecting, and self-protection.

I just wish it continued, "... including the right of the people to protect themselves from a tyrannical government," the original "legitimate purpose."
 
His first response indeed was wishy washy. He probably changed his tune because Greg Abbott is possibly considering running against him because Cornyn is not seen as being "conservative" enough by some here in Texas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top