FIVETWOSEVEN
Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,146
My state does allow you to keep anything you hit. Would it be alright to just slash it's throat?
maybe the deer should slow down
The one time this happened to me there was absolutely no doubt based on the location of the blood and fur that I'd hit the deer, and not vice versa.An insurance adjuster friend of mine told me this a long time ago that they will sometimes try and weasel out of a claim if you tell them you hit the deer.
In a reasonable world, you would do the right thing for the animal. This is rapidly becoming an unreasonable world. Me, I'd drive over the animal one more time to finish it off. If you shot it, they might think you're a terrorist. Then again, I live in NY. I think here you're expected to fill out an application for putting an animal out of its misery, attach a $300 check, and let it be processed through the proper channels.
BeerSleeper. That was brilliant. I never thought of the justification that the animal might get back up and wander into traffic, endangering others. That's smart thinking. Here in NY, that would at least get the charges reduced or dropped afterwards. But by then your guns would be gone. But it really is the best justification I've heard yet.
The one I put down was when a German tourist had hit one and he thought he was in big trouble. I looked at his rental insurance, he had the "You can kill someone and be covered" insurance rider, so I assume he was ok.
Judging by some of the replys here about the various state laws, you almost get the idea the goverment thinks we would intentionaly hit an aniaml with our car just to be able to shoot it and take home the meat. I never can figure aout the meantality of the people that make the regulations on game animals.