Is there any good reason not to use .38 +P gold dot SB in the 4" .357 K- frame revolvers ? I was thinking the low flash powder would make it a good HD load. I was using 158gr. Fed LHP for years.
No reason not to use it if you want to download the .357 mag to a .38 spl. The short barrel Speer is a good load for a .38 spl and you should pick up another 50 to 100 fps in muzzle velocity.
I've done my own water-jug expansion tests of the 135-grain Gold Dot "short barrel" ammunition from both 2 inch and 4 inch barrel revolvers and it performs very well from either length. You will be well served by this load.
The .38+p for short barrels performs well from snubbies. Some say the .357 (which uses the same exact bullet) is "over driven" somewhat - but still holds together fairly well because it is bonded.
A longer barrel in .38+p will give a bit higher velocity than a snub. But it will still be slower than the ..357 loading. It should perform well and hold together well even with 100 fps more speed than when used through a snub barrel.
Even though the people at Speer assured me that the bullet would hold together and perform well even when "over driven" (their words) - I still changed to DPX for my .357 load.
Even though I had concerns in .357's - I would probably not be concerned at all with the slight bit of speed difference created by a couple of inches more barrel on my .38 spl. revolver.
rcmodel: the original specs for this bullet apparently set an upper limit of about 1050-1100 fps before fragmentation would occur. They were fairly adamant about that early on--but who knows, maybe it was a marketing angle to reassure buyers they weren't getting hard-recoil ammo.
I suspect that Speer has now tweaked their alloy / BHN / electroplating so that they are not so worried anymore.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.