Shot a Kimber Solo 9mm today

Status
Not open for further replies.

ulflyer

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
1,437
Location
Lexington NC
A friend came down with his newly purchased used Solo with some 115 gr jacketed Federal and it performed perfectly. We then tried some really soft loads* I had just worked up for my Kahr in 115gr HP and those too cycled perfectly. I liked the sights better than on my Kahr and shot it more accurately, however, recoil was more noticeable. All in all, I was impressed.

*The loads were so soft they ejected a couple feet out and dropped in a neat pile. :)
 
I've never shot one but I read of several that owned a good one and they loved them. Sadly Kimber seems to have a habit of putting out some dogs over the years. The major screw up was stopping the practice of test firing all pistols before they were shipped. What's even more sad is there are quite a few other manufacturers that have done the same thing. :rolleyes:
 
I've only known one person who bought a Solo, and he was quite upset about the way it ran....er....DIDN'T run. Apparently, it shipped with one magazine only, and just would not load and eject reliably at all. Last I heard (a year ago), he was sending it back to Kimber. He might have only needed another magazine, but he said that only one mag came with the almost-$800 pistol, and that mag SHOULD WORK!

There are way too many pistols priced significantly less than $800 that run very well, to spend my money and time with a pistol that does not.

I can get a Shield for just over $400, and I consider it to be twice the pistol!
 
I am a RSO and try not to knock specific guns or manufacturers. My observations working on the range; Most Solo's seems to be very ammo specific. For some this is a non issue, but if you are one that feeds your gun a wide variety of bullet brands, wts., casing materials, and bullet shapes, you may find this is not the gun for you to bring on range day and expect flawless performance.

Please understand I am not a Kimber hater, and one of the most reliable firearms I own, carry, and shoot is a 3" Ultra CDP II.

Just my 2¢
 
Most Solo's seems to be very ammo specific.


Must be why they specifically state the following in their manual, website, etc. etc. etc. etc.



Kimber recommends high-quality,
factory-fresh premium personal defense
ammunition in SOLO*

USE ONLY RECOMMENDED AMMUNITION
Solo is designed to function optimally using premium hollow-point self-defense factory ammunition with bullet weights of 124 or 147 grains.

EXAMPLES INCLUDE:

• Federal® Hydra-Shok® JHP
• Remington® Golden Saber™ HPJ
• Hornady TAP® JHP

While other ammunition may perform well, lighter bullets and inconsistent pressures that can be found in lower-quality ammunition may lead to decreased slide cycle time and compromise function.
 
How many people go online to read the owners manual before they buy a firearm (LOL). Having owned a few 9mm 1911s I can say they don't run on every variation of 9mm ammo, there are too many variations. I've had good experiences with Kimber 1911s, but no experience with the Solo.
 
The Kimber Solo is one fine shooter and is my daily carry. Mine will shoot everything I feed it, even reloads.

IMG_0465.jpg
 
I'm certainly not a Kimber hater either. I have a Classic Gold Match (early) that is the most awesome pistol in my collection. BUT: It will only run with Wilson Combat 8-round mags. Suits me just fine, because I have a sack full! I love that Kimber.

I just wanted folks out there to understand that they're a bit finicky. Don't expect them to be an ammo hog like the Shield 9 is.
 
Normandy, mine is the Stainless Classic Gold Match purchased 1998.

eats everything and groups 1.5 @ 25 yards -- as advertised
and like you I had trouble with mags when it was new.
coming up on 58k rounds. 90% of which are from Missouri Bullet
and loaded 4.5 Bullseye under 200gr LSWC.
very accurate and easy on the recoil.

I've shot the SOLO and liked it. though not enough to buy as I have a Shield
and a SAS P-938 ( price was too good to pass on).
 
Glad to hear some of these are more reliable and less likely to jam than most Kimbers.
 
I'm certainly not a Kimber hater either. I have a Classic Gold Match (early) that is the most awesome pistol in my collection. BUT: It will only run with Wilson Combat 8-round mags. Suits me just fine, because I have a sack full! I love that Kimber.

I to have an early Kimber Classic Gold Match.

And it to is finicky with mags! Shoots like a rifle and loves 200 gr SWCs.

Deaf
 
My Kimber Solo Carry DC has proven to be ammo finicky, but it absolutley loves Remmy Golden Sabres. Also they have proven to be surprisingly accurate, even allowing 6ft groups at 100 yards, shooting offhand. Although heavy, it carries very well. I used to carry it OWB, but once, I found the safety had flicked off, after a long day, so I am looking fir an OWB holster that covers the safety as well. My pocket holster covers the trigger, mag release and safety, so no worries.
 
I actually have the opposite opinion in regards to the Shield. Owned one it had a horrible trigger, second only to the S&W Sigma I had. I've learned that S&W polymer autos are simply not for me.

I bought a Solo to replace the Shield and I'm tickled pink. Over 600 rounds of my very mild lead reloads and the gun runs like a Glock. Only malfunctions I've had was not installing the slide stop correctly when i first bought the gun. After i learned how it went back, it's never been an issue.
 
It just based on my experience with them.




Oh, I thought you meant most of the pistols Kimber produces have malfunctions. If that were true they would have gone out of business years ago.

I've owned four or five of them and shot at least five others. Every one of them worked just fine. They have all been 5" 1911s and fed with high quality mags though. I know these mini 1911s people think are such a great idea are not such a great idea in my opinion. I also know Kimber certainly puts out some dogs but they do make 80K pistols a year.
 
I have owned my Solo for ~2 years. I have had no problems with ammo. The gun eats anything in the mag. However, I only use the recommended ammo for personal defense. The only complaint I have is the mag release button is impossible to push with a round in the chamber and a full magazine unless you push upward on the bottom of the magazine while depressing the release button. Not a big deal, but a bit annoying.
 
I wonder if the stiff mag release is a design feature. It certainly won't accidentally release the mag.
 
The Solo is very reliable if you stick with the recommended ammo. At least that has been my experience. The gun to me has a wonderful trigger. Takeup is really smooth. Combined with premium ammo and good trigger it lends itself to an accurate little pocket pistol which is what I consider it. Not one you take to the range and put a couple of boxes through though. Would be prohibitively expensive and not what I consider this pistol to be. The only complaint I have with the Solo is it is rather hard to hold on to due to a somewhat slick gripping surface. The model with the checkered front strap would be a decided upgrade for this small gun but it comes at a premium price compaired to the base model. Just something to consider. Oh, and it's certainly not hard to look at.:)
 
Even the semi-customs at 3K aren't always perfect. I've read of Les Baers, Ed Browns, and Wilsons going back.
I bought a Solo a couple of years ago, after I'd read that their initial issues were worked out. I fondled just about every small 9mm available, but, even though a little more expensive than most others, I went with it because it was the only one available that Crimson Trace offered lasergrips for, and even though I'm color blind, and can't see the dot during the day, and can shoot faster with the iron sights, I still want them on every defensive pistol I carry.
For the first 2-300 rounds, it was flawless with any of the recommended ammo, but, would act up with the cheaper stuff. I took it apart about every 100 rounds to check for some of the issues I'd read about, but, saw no problems. At about 500 rounds, it would run WWB, Blazer Brass, or UMC in 115 grain without any problems. With a full mag, it needs to be pushed UP to be able to release it. Kimber had issues with mags falling on their earlier versions, thus the change. With an empty mag in, at slide lock, a touch of the button, and the empty flies out.
At about 1k, I was using it at a backup gun match, and had two light strikes, with 124 grain, Blazer brass ammo. When I got home, I'd realized that I'd never removed the striker and cleaned out the striker channel. From previous experience with Glocks, and M&Ps, they needed to be cleaned out about every 500 rounds to be reliable. I cleaned the striker & channel, and was surprised at how clean it was, in comparison to other striker fired pistols I've had apart.
I went to the range the next day, and ran about 50 rounds through it, and had another misfire, which is not acceptable for a defensive gun.
I called Kimber. They sent me a call tag. A couple of weeks later it was returned with a slip saying they had replaced every spring, and the safeties. I had to laugh when I saw they replaced the safeties. I don't have a clue why they did, unless a little of the bluing was worn from carry, because I NEVER used the safeties, except at a backup gun match. It is a striker-fired pistol, with a longer trigger pull than a Glock or M&P, and doesn't NEED an external safety.
Even though I shoot mostly 1911s & 2011s for USPSA, IDPA, and 3-gun, and automatically release the safety on the draw, I won't carry a pistol that SHOULD have a safety engaged, because of the high stress factor, I want to be able to just draw, and pull the trigger.
In the time I've owned it, I also bought some 8 round magazines, and can get my whole hand on the grip, which makes it a LOT easier to shoot. I'm looking to get some replacement base pads for the 6 round magazines, with a pinky extension for the same reason. Shooting it with only one finger on the front strap makes it hard to control.
 
My past Kimber experience was painful and expensive; causing me to swear off them for life. However, I can't help but be impressed by the Solo. While I've ever had a chance to fire one, I have had the chance to fondle one and was thoroughly impressed.
 
I have carried mine for 2 years. Way more accurate than most of the small pistols. Mine shoots handloads as well as factory loads. My daughter has a shield which is a great gun also...especially for the money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top