for agricola
http://www.jpfo.org/unpopularsp-winston-deporting.htm
Deporting Muslims
by Emanuel A. Winston
Winston Mid East Analysis & Commentary, March 9, 2003
www.gamla.org.il/english and
http://freeman.io.com
I forecast a time when nations of the West will weary of radical Muslim Islamists and move to deport them back to their home countries. Unlike most immigrant populations escaping hostile governments or merely seeking greater opportunity in jobs, education and health care, radical Muslims breed an atmosphere of anger against their host nations.
The Europeans complain bitterly when the political Right of Israel maintain that the Arab Muslims do not want peace with the Jewish State of Israel and, therefore, would be better off living among their own brethren. But, that incompatibility is now becoming a major problem in France, England, the Netherlands - even in China when conversion to Islam guides the convert to become an adversary of the host nation.
According to Michael Ledeen in his new book: The War Against the Terror Masters (1) most of our vulnerability can be laid at the feet of a succession of American Presidents, namely, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Sr. and, especially Bill Clinton. They found it politically importune to wage war against Terror. I strongly recommend this book will write about it more fully in the near future.
Even in America called the "great melting pot", since 9/11 it has been discovered that, during more than the past 30 years, rogue Arab/Muslim nations have been sending in Muslims who are hostile to America s Judeo-Christian free, democratic culture.
For more than 30 years the Arabs lived their own lives in their own lands which, at best, was backward, often primitive, when compared to the advancements of Western civilization. When oil became a highly valued commodity, the West was attracted to make commercial contacts with the Arab/Muslim countries in the Middle East. Not only was there commercial intercourse but Arab Muslims found the freedom and opportunities of the West irresistible and began immigrating into the democratic, free and open West. They could have made a successful migration as others had except for the tenets of Islam and its mandate to spread their religion by any means possible.
In America, the U.S. State Department had its diplomats currying favor with the oil-rich Arab/Muslim Sheiks and thus became enablers for a flood of Arab/Muslims from nations known to be hostile to America. Even such a hostile, Terror supporting Arab nation as Syria, who had no oil to speak of, was courted as a spoiler.
The U.S. State Department always knew that such nations as Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran - and even Egypt - had no love for America but the U.S. opened her borders to their incoming nationals anyway. Many American diplomats went native when serving in these nations and became outspoken defenders and apologists for hostile Arab/Muslim nations. When they left the employment of the U.S. State Department, many were then employed by the Arab/Muslim nations to lobby the current Administration and the Congress.
So, America started to fill up with a Muslim immigrant population that was not always friendly - with some coming in as trained Terror agents to establish sleeper cells . Even the FBI knew that it was politically unwise to investigate suspicious Arab/Muslims lest the U.S. State Department use the power given to them in order to protect the Arab/Muslims.
On March 5th, a homicide bomber from Hamas in Hebron blew up a bus full of schoolchildren returning home in Haifa, killing at least 16, wounding 40, with 2 in grave to critical condition and at least 5 victims in serious condition. This was the first successful Terror attack in 2 months but, 122 attacks were thwarted by the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) and security forces.
Nevertheless, the Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the protest theme of "No Arabs = No Terror" was illegal, although the facts of Arab/Muslim Terror speaks for themselves. Since buses and other civilian sites seem to be the prime target for Arab Palestinian Islamist homicide bombers, perhaps there must be a separate bus line for Arab Palestinians. It would certainly be more effective than a hugely expensive "fence" to supposedly separate the Jews from the Arabs.
Today, the nations of the world tell Israel not to separate the Jewish population from the Arabs, even as the Arabs try to attack daily. The world's nations threaten Israel, lest Israel transfer the Arabs to Jordan where there are vast empty lands and 70% of the population is Arab Palestinian. Although words like "segregation" and "apartheid" have properly been positioned as unacceptable treatment of peaceful people by dominant cultures, nevertheless, separation of Arab Muslims and Israeli Jews is unavoidable. Arab statements followed by interminable hostility pledged ongoing mandates that a two state solution cannot ever succeed but that, "In Blood and Fire, We will Redeem you, O Jerusalem!"
I think one day soon nations like France, England, Germany, Holland, Belgium, etc. will politely (or not so politely) ask their Muslim populations to return to the nations from whence they came, which accept the Shari ah laws and all of its repressive mandates. Of course, there has been talk of the French migrating into Canada, with the English moving to the colonies.
Worse yet, with the availability of WMD (Weapons of Mass Death), a hostile immigrant population could take their alleged grievances to the point where radical Islamists could blow up or poison an entire city somewhere in the West.
America has had many waves of immigrations from every country in the world. Every color, creed, religion and, while there were minor clashes, never did one culture threaten the existence of another culture or the host nation as do the radical Muslim.
There is something in their teachings that, when they reach a critical mass and feel their power in numbers, something goes "click" and the aggressive behavior surfaces - or the sleeper cells are ordered to activate Terrorist warfare**. It is not that they were provoked into adversarial attitudes by the other cultures around them - except for the simple fact that there are others who are not Muslim which seems to irritate them. Perhaps it is the Islamic teachings by the Mullahs who train the children to grow up to hate and believe themselves spiritually superior that triggers this predatory mind-set as they mature.
Today, across the globe, we see a vast awakening of hostile Islam. This is aided by modern day communications where even the most poor and backward have TV or radio. When they see their Islamic brethren rise up in one nation, they are triggered to do so and delighted by the opportunity to wage Terror (low-intensity warfare), if not full scale war.
At this time, the West is suffering from so-called Muslim militants who thrill to the danger and the Terror they unleash. Moderate Muslims also thrill vicariously to the successes of their violent co-religionists. In their hearts, they wish them victory. Children especially sponge up these feelings of rage and the jubilation of first throwing stones and later graduating to fire-bombs, knives, guns, explosives and homicide bombings.
Some say, not all Muslims are Terrorists but admit that most Terrorists in the past decade have been Muslims. Worse yet, now that the modern world of high technology has put weapons of unbelievably destructive power into the hands of religious primitives, small groups or one dedicated man can accomplish incalculable devastation.
We cannot differentiate the trained radical Terrorists from the willing but untrained Islamists. In terms of necessary profiling, we cannot tell the peaceful, moderate Muslim from the subliminally hostile, trained, funded and armed Muslim homicide bomber.
The world is now under attack from a culture which believes it has been given a mandate that flows from Allah, through Mohammed via the Koran by the mouths of the Mullahs which tasks Muslims to spread Islam until they dominate all mankind.
In democratic countries where there is the process of voting, the politicians begin to appeal to Muslims for their votes because they are many. Part of that appeal is to ignore their outrageous behavior or find a way to apologize for and to forgive the hostile Muslims. We see this in France and England - even with some politicians in the American Congress beginning to yelp about unfair profiling of Muslims in fund-raising charities or students at universities who are taking courses in nuclear physics, chemistry, biology, aerodynamic rocketry, etc. These politicians are looking for political donor funds and the votes.
Regrettably, the harvesting of Arab/Muslim votes has been a strong motivating factor among the leaders of Israel's Left wing parties of Labor, Meretz.
The abortive Oslo process was driven largely by the Left hoping that grateful Palestinians would vote them into power and keep them there. They liked their Knesset (Parliament) seats and perks so many worked for the Arab/Muslim votes, against the interests and needs of the Jewish State. Once the mistake of opening the gates of the city was made by appeasement (through the Oslo Accords and those that followed), the Arab/Muslims felt strong and perceived the Jews as weak because they gave up their own lands in an attempted appeasement.
Oslo was followed by a dramatic ramping up of Terror against Jews everywhere in Israel and also Christians around the world. The nation of Israel, even the Left has finally recognized their mistake and voted the Left Labor/Meretz parties out of power.
I dare say that this will soon happen in America, France, England and across Europe. But, will it be soon enough? The attempt to pacify Islam on the march is an exercise in futility and both the people and the politicians will pay the price in blood. This the Arab/Muslims promise. In all their demonstrations, they chant: "In blood and fire, we will redeem you, O Jerusalem!"
Looking ahead, I forecast the time when the nations will, indeed, invite their Muslim populations to repatriate themselves back to where the fundamentalist Islamic Shari ah laws are the law of the land.
** Terror is defined as low intensity warfare.
1. The War Against the Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We Will Win by Michael A. Ledeen St. Martin s Press 2002
