Sig 220 Carry

[bill111444]

I'm going to buy a Sig 220 Carry for CC. I narrowed it down to two, either the 220 SAS Generation II Nitron or the 220 Equinox. I just can't decide which one, I'm 51% for the SAS, it looks "ALL business" and I like the idea of "no rail". Then I look at the EQ, WOW, what a good looking gun, then it becomes 51%. I'd like to know your opinion?

 

[Inebriated]

SAS... that Equinox is going to get scratched, worn, and dirty being carried.... Wouldn't want to do that to such a gorgeous gun, would you?

 

[Fatelvis]

I see no reason for a rail on a CCW pistol. A home defense pistol? Yes.

 

[Micro]

Another vote for the SAS. For a carry gun, it's the way to go.

 

[FMF Doc]

The SAS models are designed for carry. There are no sharp edges or anything to get hung up on. If this is going to be a daily carry for you, get the SAS, you won't be disappointed.

 

[Sheepdog1968]

I like the potential versatility that a rail offers so I'd go that direction. You want not want the rail now but maybe later you will.

 

[VINTAGE-SLOTCARS]

Sig

220 Equinox !!! Thats been my main carry for 6 months now. I like the "LOOK" !!!!

 

[Mainsail]

...what a good looking gun...

Will you be carrying openly? A good looking gun carried concealed is kind of silly unless you just enjoy admiring it when you're home.

 

[bill111444]

Thanks for the replies, I agree with the majority, the SAS Carry. I think it is a "good looker" too. It reminds me of the Smith M19 snub...everything you need and nothing you don't.

 

[SwampWolf]

unless you just enjoy admiring it when you're home.

I do that a lot. But then, when it comes to looks, I buy things I like to look at, not for what I think others might like to see.