sig-225

Status
Not open for further replies.
rellascout posted:
I am sorry you are right. JHP not an issue.

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=367838

Wow, you're right. The fact that one or two people have had an issue with one type of HP from one manufacturer is certainly proof positive that all P6s are unreliable and unable to feed any type of HP ammo. Good argument. You've convinced me. I'm going to run right out and sell my P6s.
 
I've followed the P225/P6 debate here and on the Sig forum, among other places, it's been very interesting. Some of the people who seem really bent out of shape about them are people who paid $600.00 for a 225 and feel sheepish about others getting P6's for half that, although they'd never admit it. Others are folks who've always paid the rather high prices for SIG's, and have held them out as the ultimate in semi's to justify the price, and now feel they have to put down the folks paying $300.00.

Hey, what do I know? I'm just a guy who likes guns, and has for a long time. If a person pays their hard-earned for a firearm and enjoys it, he or she is alright by me.

I'm so old that I remember when only revolvers were good enough for self-defense, and then when Glocks were just plastic pieces of poop, and when SIG's were high-priced pieces of bent sheet metal, among other misconceptions. Of course, all those opinions have changed with time. Your choice does not have to be bad for mine to be good. It is my considered opinion that the P6's are good guns. For hollowpoints, it is better to have one whose serial # begins with the letter "K" or any letter after that. Shoot 'em if you got 'em!
 
Boy ignoring the facts about the P6. Look it up everything I have stated is 100%. Post it anywhere you want and people who know this guns and know Sig will agree that the P6 and the P225 are not the same pistol.

The mags I use are Mecgars. Which my friend are OEM mags for many of the Sig line. Their 25 round P228 mags are 100% flush fit. All they did was change the follower a bit.

As for the 17 rounders they are a very popular modification made by people who know Sigs. All you do is put an X-grip extender on a P226 17 round MecGar and you get a P228 like this.

P2281.jpg


I would not call that a monstrosity or even sticking out. I would call that P228 mag with a very nice slam pad.

You seem to take this all very personally Bullzaye. Did I call you ugly? Did I say you smell? No I stated facts about a weapon you happen to own. Its a piece of steel designed to direct bullets in particular direction. Nothing more. I did not insult you or anyone. I simply stated facts. Your personal choice in this particular pistol seems to be very emotional for you. I am sorry to have hit such a nerve. Enjoy for P6. No one ever said you couldn't, just don't call it a P225 because it is not.
 
I've followed the P225/P6 debate here and on the Sig forum, among other places, it's been very interesting. Some of the people who seem really bent out of shape about them are people who paid $600.00 for a 225 and feel sheepish about others getting P6's for half that, although they'd never admit it. Others are folks who've always paid the rather high prices for SIG's, and have held them out as the ultimate in semi's to justify the price, and now feel they have to put down the folks paying $300.00.

Hey, what do I know? I'm just a guy who likes guns, and has for a long time. If a person pays their hard-earned for a firearm and enjoys it, he or she is alright by me.

I'm so old that I remember when only revolvers were good enough for self-defense, and then when Glocks were just plastic pieces of poop, and when SIG's were high-priced pieces of bent sheet metal, among other misconceptions. Of course, all those opinions have changed with time. Your choice does not have to be bad for mine to be good. It is my considered opinion that the P6's are good guns. For hollowpoints, it is better to have one whose serial # begins with the letter "K" or any letter after that. Shoot 'em if you got 'em!

Well stated. I don't think it the P6 is a bad pistol it is simply not a P225. At its current price it is a great gun. The number one problem is that mags are becoming scare. They are demanding $30+++ these days. What makes that worse is that P225/P6 mags have a history of the feeding lips going bad under heavy use. Those mags will quickly move to the $50 range once these pistols become even more popular.

It's not about $$$$ its about accuracy of information. I did not pay much more for my P225 then the Grade 1 guns currently being sold. I think I paid about $500 but the gun came with a High Noon holster, 3 sets of grips, 2 boxes of ranger +p+ Hollowpoints, 5 mags, box and manual. Oh it also had a trigger job, XO night sights, orginal sights and short and long trigger.

"K" Serial number guns greatly increase the viability of it properly feeding hollowpoints.
 
Well, I have to admit that I was not aware of that magazine. A 25 rounder that is more-or-less flush fitting? That is impressive. I wonder if they use that same sort of "ribbon" spring that I've seen used years ago to increase mag capacity. The ribbon almost always became detached from the inside of the mag, rendering the mag useless, and as far as I knew it couldn't be repaired.

What bothers me is how quickly people rush to insult firearms that other people are quite pleased with. I personally don't care, because my P6s are just for fun and will likely never be carried for SD (though from my personal experience I would be fine with loading them up with HPs and carrying them), same with my P228 or P225. When I am carrying concealed I am carrying either a Glock 32, 19, or 20, or possibly a S&W .357, .44 Mag. or 10MM. But I've seen many people discussing various guns that they've bought and are quite happy with, only to have others come crashing in to insult their choices, tell them they've bought crap, or that when they get more experience they'll move away from their "beginner" gun, or some other such nonsense. Your posts sounded quite similar to this, to me.

I also believe that Bullet Bob hit it right on the money with his statement that people are miffed that they paid $600 for a similar gun that's now selling for $300. This same "sour grapes" was apparent when the Blue Sky imported Garands first became available, and still happens occasionally when surplus guns become available.
 
Bullzaye,

I hear what you are saying. I don't think I ever stated that the P6 was not a good gun. I think you read it that way. I simply stated it was not a P225 and then was asked for clarification which I provided it. I get very concerned with people using the P6 as a CCW or defense gun using hollow points. I would hate for the first time someone hears about the JHP issue to be a defense situation.

As for the X-grips check them out even if just for the range. They can be used on Sig factory P226 mags or the MecGars. Mecgars are my favorite Sig mags. They are 100% and have never failed me in a P228/P229/P226 etc... They are not weak sprung at all. They have been factory OEM mags for Sig in the past. IIFC at one time they were the OEM for the P228 mags. Top Gun supply is a great source for the X-grips.

http://www.topgunsupply.com/X-Grip-Sig-P228-P229-pr-285.html
 
I am sorry you are right. JHP not an issue.

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=367838
Yup, I see a total of "1" person having an issue, and a few replies stating that its a known issue, but it doesnt appear to be from them personally. As I said earlier, it isnt the MAJORITY of people having the problem(although this sort of thing is the majority of the problem with the internet), just a few. You were making it sound like all of the P6''s were having an issue.

Gander Mountain is a horrible example of pricing.
Maybe, maybe not. I've actually got a couple of really good deals there. It is one that just about anyone can walk into an see exactly what I stated.

I agree, they can be quite high, and some of their new, and obviously, some of their used guns, are very high. They were one of the first to offer the P6's, at least around here, and at a fairly reasonable price, $3-350, depending on the time you walked in.(they hadnt even hit any of the other sellers yet, and I get all the trades flyers) Can you find anything cheaper, sure, I havent paid more than $750 for my new SIG's (with night sights) either, and I'm sure others have paid a LOT more at other places than Gander.

It doesnt matter who's pricing them, you can find very nice examples of the P6's for more than a good bit less than an equal example of the P225. By equal, I mean overall shape, not nit picking about whats on the grip or slide. You do have to admit, its more of a SIG purist thing, than a real issue. My P6 (and yours) will shoot every bit as good as your P225, so whats it matter?

You can call it snobbery if you want I call it the current market.
What I was calling "snobbery", was the comparison between two grades of the SAME model. My lowly, ugly, painted "Sportsman" has killed a hell of a lot more critters than my buddies fancy grade 1100 and breaks more birds at the clays range than his when we shoot them together, but his is "better" because its got better wood and finish, and of course, he paid a LOT more for it. :rolleyes:

T seems odd that a Sig fan would debate that there is a difference between the P6 and a P225.
Would you debate there is a difference between the different (grade) models of any other gun, other than maybe "collecting" specific models, in their actual use?

For the most part functionally, the P6 and the P225 are the same or can be the same, if something about it bothers you. It seems to bother some, that I can have a P6 that is on par, functionally, for a lot less than they paid for their P225. Or is that the whole point, that maybe they paid more, and that makes them special?

Opinions are rarely humble, and everyone has one. I guess some of us can deal with the humble models of certain guns better than others can. :)
 
Heck I paid about $400 for my P6, I got it about a year ago when they were coming over but not in the numbers they are now. Off the top of my head it's about 25, 26 years old. And it's sure got some "honest use" marks which I certainly don't mind at all!

That said it is a SWEET SHOOTER, fits my hand very well, and fits fine in a Mitch Rosen Express holster. :D
 
No it does not bother me at all that you have a P6. If I wanted one I certainly could have one. I personally see no need since I already own a P225 which I have had for quite a few years now.

As for your companion the difference I see is in the materials used and their direct function on the gun. It is the difference between a stock gun and a gun with a trigger job.
 
Bullzaye said:
A 25 rounder that is more-or-less flush fitting?

His finger slipped, he meant 15 rounders that fit flush. :)

I'd like a P6, but after I think about it, I always decide not to. $250+shipping and FFL, puts you to at least $325. Then they need springs and such to get a nicer trigger like normal Sigs, and could probably use a refinishing (at least some of the recent ones I've seen). I think I'd rather spend $500-600 on a used 225, 228, or 239.
 
Well I can only speak for my own experience. I bought 2, one excellent grade, one very good. I see no need to change any springs, nor to refinish. I'm perfectly content with them as they sit. If it had happened that I'd gotten one that had a very worn finish, I'd probably just consider it a "beater" and let it go at that.

Everyone has their own way of doing things. Many people like to modify a gun quite a bit. For instance, lots of folks will buy a cheap SKS, and then spend another $200-$300 tricking it out. Not me. I own 4 SKSs, and they're all stock. I buy a gun for what it is, not what I can turn it into.

Lest I be misunderstood...for those that prefer customizing or modifying their guns, more power to ya! Do what works for you, or what pleases you. I'm just more of a "box stock" kinda guy. I dunno, maybe I'm just cheap.
 
Rellascout:

As general rule I love W. German made Sigs more than anything currently in production. Sig has lost its touch since moving its production to Exeter IHMO. The new P220 external extractor even has issues so the fit to their most recent known issue is not even a real fix but that is for another thread. The W. German origin and its rock bottom price are the biggest pluses to the P6 IMHO.
Totally agree with you. The internal extractor bent-slide Sigs are the way to go. Don't get me started about rails... :fire:

Well for starters the P6 was made in W. German to fire 115Gr ball ammo. It was not made to reliability feed US hollow points. Earlier models will not feed reliably and since these are trade ins the chance of getting a parts gun is much higher so date codes do not tell the whole story.
Wrong. 100% wrong. Absolutely wrong...
And I notice that someone else already corrected you.


Now I know there will be thousands of new P6 owners saying they feed just fine but why use something for a defense gun that was not designed for that purpose.

Second the fit and finish of these guns are not a shining example of what Sig can do. They are not up to the level of the Commercial P225.
Wow, the excellent ones I've seen were every bit as nice as my W German P220 and US P239. The grips are kind of not nice, but neither were the ones on my 220. Maybe the ones you handled were older, more worn, or abused?

Third the trigger spring is 3-4 pounds heavier in both DA/SA modes Yes people replace the recoil springs and other springs and that helps. The problem I see is that you end up with lighter but certainly not smoother trigger, see point #2. Most P6s I have held and shot needed a trigger job to get to real Sig standards.
Granted, this is a pistol made for police daily duty carry, and not a nice civilian pistol. Like NYC and Glocks, they wanted a stronger trigger.

Fourth the Hammer is useless with its notch design. This was requested so the German police armorer would know if someone dropped their gun.
Useless? As a hammer? As a cup holder? Please explain how it is useless. Perhaps not as pretty as other Sig hammers, but USELESS? Please... :rolleyes:

To me they are like a BMW with cloth seats.
Personally, I prefer cloth seats, they don't get as hot in summer, and my butt doesn't slip, and you don't have to scrub and oil them either. Shall we just say we disagree?

I hear what you are saying. I don't think I ever stated that the P6 was not a good gun.
Yes, you did, I counted multiple uses of "Inferior" in your many posts on the subject.
I think you read it that way. I simply stated it was not a P225 and then was asked for clarification which I provided it.
This is about the same as calling a Ford P71 Police Interceptor and a Ford Crown Victoria different cars- both are the same car, both are the Ford Panther chassis used in Lincoln, Mercury and Ford RWD cars, with one having specific improvements to endear it to the civilian market, versus the other equipped specifically for police duty. In the real world, both are still Panthers and most parts are interchangeable. In fact, if dressed in similar paint schemes, most folks would not be able to tell them apart.
In fact, this is amazingly similar. The departments rotate the P71's out as they age, and get used hard. They sell at a discount at auctions, and usually taxi companies gobble them up. The qualities that make them good police cruisers work well as taxis.


From the couple of people I've run into on the internet talking about the "inferior" Sig P6 versus a P225, most of them seem almost jealous that a P6 costs half as much as a P225.

The P225 is not a bad gun, but when compared to the P239, and the P228, which of the three sold more units? The P228 gave you double stack in the same size package. The P239 gave you more concealability in a similar size package. The P225 was a single stack 9mm in a world of Wondernines. Were it not for the recent P6 imports, would anyone have heard of the P225 except for Sig collectors?

When the first wave of P6's hit the US, they were marketed for $450-$500, up there in Sig price range. Gander Mountain bought the majority of the first guns and marketed them as used. Prices gradually fell as people turned away from these banged up old Sigs.
These were the first guns rotated out of service, and were the oldest, beat-up-est, tiredest guns the armorers had to dispose of. As the contract is fulfilled, better and better guns are coming in, and the price has dropped to $350, $300, and now $259. I seriously doubt we'll be seing any sort of deal like this again, and P225 owner's snobbery not withstanding, I urge anyone who is thinking about one to strongly consider acting before a presidential executive order stops importation.

Somehow, the idea of a Sig designed for police service does not sound like a bad idea.
But then, I always liked buying old police cruisers at auction and bombing around in them.
If some German police officer could carry their gun safely and defend themselves, somehow I think we US citizens will have no problems with P6s, either.
 
I really do love you guys. I love how people always take gun talk so personally. It makes no sense to me.

The best part is that you prove my point with your own post. 3 tp 5 years ago people did not even know what a P6 or P225 was. Most people had no knowledge that this pistol even existed outside of Sig fans. People are so wrapped up in cap wonder 9s that these guns were over looked. I have owned mine for over 5 years. I bought the first god example I could get my hands on for a fair price because they simply did not get sold back in the day. People who bought the p225 in the 90's kept them. Now that there has been a flood of these guns there are millions of NEW P225/P6 experts. Most of them have never even handled a P225 but are sure the P6 is on par. When someone who is a long time Sig fan brings up the difference people jump yet 90% of these people have no true point of reference.

I mean honestly if you asked 100 people who bought a P6 the majority would tell you they own a P225. This is simply not the case.

In the end buy what you want. The P6 is decent deal. It is a good pistol. I would like to point out that you seem to not understand the word "inferior". It means situated lower down or of less importance, value, or merit. It does not necessary mean bad. It simply means not as good in comparison to another.

In the end people think that it is about the money. Honestly in the world of firearms $300 is nothing. That is less than a month worth of good shooting out of a 9mm these days.

Again by what you want but there is no jealously involved and your personal dig on me is not appreciated. I unlike you don't take statements about the pistols I own personally so lets keep it out of the "personal attack" arena. You like the P6. I don't like it as much. Please keep your comments about the gun not me.
 
Last edited:
I was kind of interested in buying one of these surplus P6s until I read this bickering thread. Between the bickering some useful information came out that has persuaded me that I really don't need one. Seems they are fine firearms, potentially collectible, and well suited for the firearms hobbyist or enthusiast (which I guess is most of the folks on this forum...). But too many valid questions have come up through the cracks in this debate regarding their usefulness as a SD/HD tool vs. other similarly-priced guns.
 
Again I think the P6 is good gun but people have to understand what they ar buying. If it is a defense gun they need to be aware of the serial number and make sure that they are getting a 100% later gun.

Right now there are so many good guns out there at ridiculous low prices. In CDNNs email blast this morning they are selling the FNP-9 for $379 with 3 16 round mags and two backstraps. This is modern wonder 9 that will feed anything you out into it and for the money is a better defense gun then the P6 IMHO.
 
rellascout said:
To me they are like a BMW with cloth seats.
So the P6 is better, then? ;)

A proper BMW does in fact have cloth seats. Leather is marketed and sold to Americans who see the company as a high end luxury car manufacturer - cloth is more durable than leather, and it breathes better while keeping the driver in place during sport driving. Take it from a Bavarian - me. :)

In all seriousness, I agree with your comparison between the P6 and P225. I just don't agree that a BMW without leather seats is a bad thing - quite the opposite, in fact. :)
 
I really do love you guys. I love how people always take gun talk so personally. It makes no sense to me.

The best part is that you prove my point with your own post. 3 tp 5 years ago people did not even know what a P6 or P225 was. Most people had no knowledge that this pistol even existed outside of Sig fans. People are so wrapped up in cap wonder 9s that these guns were over looked. I have owned mine for over 5 years. I bought the first god example I could get my hands on for a fair price because they simply did not get sold back in the day. People who bought the p225 in the 90's kept them. Now that there has been a flood of these guns there are millions of NEW P225/P6 experts. Most of them have never even handled a P225 but are sure the P6 is on par. When someone who is a long time Sig fan brings up the difference people jump yet 90% of these people have no true point of reference.

I mean honestly if you asked 100 people who bought a P6 they would tell you they own a P225. This is simply not the case.

In the end buy what you want. The P6 is decent deal. It is a good pistol. I would like to point out that you seem to not understand the word "inferior". It means situated lower down or of less importance, value, or merit. It does not necessary mean bad. It simply means not as good in comparison to another.

In the end people think that it is about the money. Honestly in the world of firearms $300 is nothing. That is less than a month worth of good shooting out of a 9mm these days.

Again by what you want but there is no jealously involved and your personal dig on me is not appreciated. I unlike you don't take statements about the pistols I own personally so lets keep it out of the "personal attack" arena. You like the P6. I don't like it as much. Please keep your comments about the gun not me.

did you read what you wrote? You must have spoken to ALL the people to know what you think you know.
 
Not at all. I simply am not a johnny come lately to the Sig pistols like the P225. People had very little knowledge of these pistols before the recent importation of the used police guns.

Sorry you don't like what I have to say but it does not make in incorrect.
 
I think that it is true. The P225 was never that popular in the US. Capacity is king as far as the US market is concerned. It is the logo on the Sig forum and people used to ask all the time what Sig is that.

I think I am correct. If you asked the people, flocking to gun shows, Dan's ammo, AIM, Centerfire etc... for these P6s, what gun did you buy they will tell you they bought a P225.

I mean look at this forum people use P6 and P225 interchangeably even though they are clearly different animals. I mean seriously look at the title of this thread. What does it say?
 
I mean look at this forum people use P6 and P225 interchangeably even though they are clearly different animals.
OK, keeping it in the same vein...Is the M11 a P228, or not? How about the M9, Beretta 92, or not?

Other than some "cosmetic" and minor part differences, which can be interchanged, there is no difference.

If you stripped a P6 and a P225 and mixed the parts on the table and then reassembled them using the mixed up parts, the guns would work. If the P6 is not a P225, why do the parts interchange?

Like evan said, a Crown Vic is a Crown Vic, be it a fancy loaded model your Pap drives, or one that has a little plate on the back that says "Interceptor" that the Trooper who just pulled Pap over drives.

Quote:
I mean honestly if you asked 100 people who bought a P6 they would tell you they own a P225.
I am suggesting that this statement is incorrect.
Me too.

If it is a defense gun they need to be aware of the serial number and make sure that they are getting a 100% later gun.
The only way you know your getting ANY gun that is a 100%, is to shoot it with what you intend to carry in it, before you carry it.

Just curious, but is there a list of older guns that reflects the serial number of guns that have been armorer/arsenal upgraded to newer barrels that will feed hollow points? I have both early and later guns and both will feed anything you put in them. Hows the serial number or date cutoff work there?
 
My understanding is the K serial numbers are newer barrels.

Your M11/P288 and M9/92FS apology does not apply. The M11 delivered were not spec'd differently then the standard P228. The same goes for the M9.

Again with the ****ing crown Vic. The real analogy would be a VW Passat compared to a Audi A6. They are essentially the same car. Parts are interchangeable. They share the same engine and basic platform but as they are delivered they are very different cars.

One can make a Passat into something that performs like the A6 but it is still a Passat.
 
Your M11/P288 and M9/92FS apology does not apply. The M11 delivered were not spec'd differently then the standard P228. The same goes for the M9.
What do they say on the slides?




So, this really is all about the "snob" thing then, isnt it? :rolleyes:


OK then, be that way. :neener:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top