Jack19
Member
It depends on which caliber you choose for your 239.
I had a 239 in 9mm that was absolutely, hands down, one of the best handguns I've ever owned. Deadly accurate and it would feed everything I put in it. And unlike its bigger brothers, the finish did not come off after repeated drawings; and the small metal parts didn't rust.
I don't know what, if anything, SIG did differently with the 239. Mine, however, was what I expected a SIG to be. Unlike every one of its bigger brothers.
I've heard less than stellar comments about the .40sw and the .357sig in the 239. My advice is that if you're looking for a small, thin, compact DA/SA 9mm, the 239 is hard to beat.
I had a 239 in 9mm that was absolutely, hands down, one of the best handguns I've ever owned. Deadly accurate and it would feed everything I put in it. And unlike its bigger brothers, the finish did not come off after repeated drawings; and the small metal parts didn't rust.
I don't know what, if anything, SIG did differently with the 239. Mine, however, was what I expected a SIG to be. Unlike every one of its bigger brothers.
I've heard less than stellar comments about the .40sw and the .357sig in the 239. My advice is that if you're looking for a small, thin, compact DA/SA 9mm, the 239 is hard to beat.