Sig 320 opinions.

[bscott29]

How do you guys like em? I like the idea of the compact .40 in fde. Never even handled one though.

 

[GZOh]

Just got a NIB P320 Compact 9mm... my first striker-fire pistola... GREAT shoot!!
Fits my hand perfect, ideal carry-size, VERY accurate and the trigger is OUTSTANDING!... 300+ rnds, Flawless!
IMHO, SIG has hit a 'home-run' with this pistola. This is my third 'poly' (along with my SP-2022 and 2009)...
It's a definite 'keeper'... highly recommend!

 

[pblanc]

I am not crazy about Glocks (not comfortable in my hand and I don't like the grip angle with the bore), and neither S&W M&P's nor Springfield Armory XD felt right as well.

Up till recently I wasn't much excited over polymer-frame, striker fired pistols. The pistols I have are all metal with a hammer, mostly traditional double action, with one single-action only and one double action only.

But the simplicity of operation and consistency of trigger pull do make some sense. I have tried the P320 full-size in .40 caliber, the HK VP9 (9mm) and the FNH FNS-40 (.40cal). Haven't gotten to try the Walther PPQ in either 9mm or .40 cal.

Loved the Sig P320F 40. Fit my hand very well with the medium grip module, absorbed recoil very nicely with a good sight picture and, what was for me, outstanding accuracy. The HK VP9 was a nice pistol but limited to 9mm and I found it tended to pinch my finger against the bottom of the trigger guard. It did not fit my hand as well as the Sig and I didn't shoot it as well as I did the Sig despite the softer recoil. Both the P320 and the HK VP9 had very good triggers but I preferred that of the P320.

I liked the FNH FNS-40 more than I thought I would. It was pretty comfortable and shot well. It did not fill my hand as well as the Sig grip did, though. The FNH FNS with contrast sights is more expensive than the Sig P320 with night sights and I liked the P320 trigger better. I also like the ability to have both a full-size .40 caliber and a compact 9mm pistol with exactly the same trigger just by buying a caliber X-change kit.

If I were to but one today, I would probably go with the P320 compact 9mm since the .40 caliber full-size caliber X-change kits seem to be available and the 9mm kits are not. But I would really like to try the .45 cal ACP Sig first.

 

[wild cat mccane]

Just bought my second Walther PPQ.

I intended to give the Glock 34, Sig 320, and VP9 a fair shake before purchasing one.

The Sig 320 fell in last place of the group.

Longest reset and what felt like the heaviest trigger...by a good measure.

It also looks and feels the cheapest.

 

[RustyShackelford]

Walther PPQ & the SIG P320 Compact .....

I've read and saw several + reviews of the PPQ models.
I might trade my used Glock 21 .45acp gen 04 in on a M2 9x19mm version.
I was also looking at a NIB P320 compact 9mm with a OD frame. It was a version with SIG Sauer factory night sights.
I like the modular format of the P320 series. The way you can quickly change calibers & different frames is good.
I haven't shot or used any yet but Id give it a good look.

 

[bscott29]

I'm confused about some things related to the 320.
1) are there different grip circumstances within the different size grip modules? For example if I have a compact can I get a compact with different grip circumstances?

2) can I put a sub-compact gtip module on a full size? And so on and so forth.
3) I read that the 45 grip frames won't work with the rest.
4) if there aren't different grip circumstances within the frame sizes to me it would be pointless. Because on a gen 4 glock you can use 9mm and 40 barrels on the 40's and change backstraps. Which would actually make a glock/m&p more modular.

 

[Fiv3r]

The modularity seems to be less about grip size and more about frame size, ie a full size for duty, a compact for carry and a sub for deep concealment.

You can also swap uppers onto different size lowers. I actually have thought about getting a sub compact grip for my compact slide on my p250 in 9mm. The stubby grip would print less but still give me a longer sight radius. I've also thought about getting a full size kit in .40 for a couple hundred bucks.

The true modularity of the 250/320 is that no matter what caliber you choose, the chassis is a drop in. You could buy a full size .45, then part and piece a subcompact 9mm and still only own "one" gun officially. In the case of the 250 you have 9mm, .357 SIG, .40 and .45 options.

I will say that the chassis is very easy to swap out. My Nano is also modular (with almost no options beyond a grip frame color currently) and it's got a lot more pieces to roll away.

I like the 320. It may be my next striker fired pistol. I still think the p250 is under appreciated for what it is.

 

[MikeJackmin]

1) are there different grip circumstances within the different size grip modules? For example if I have a compact can I get a compact with different grip circumstances?

Yes. Each grip frame (full, compact, or subcompact) is available with a small, medium, or large grip. I think the only exception to the rule is that the subcompacts are available in small or medium only.

2) can I put a sub-compact gtip module on a full size? And so on and so forth.

Yep. The compact slide over the subcompact grip is a popular combination.

3) I read that the 45 grip frames won't work with the rest.

All the grip frames are the same, with the only difference being the magazine well. 9mm and .40 grip frames happen to be interchangeable because the magazines are the same size.

Changing from a 9 to a .40 requires only a top-end and magazine swap. Changing to (or from) the .45 also requires moving the FCU into the appropriate grip frame, which only takes a few seconds.

The .380 kit (already available for the 250), also requires its own grip frame.

4) if there aren't different grip circumstances within the frame sizes to me it would be pointless. Because on a gen 4 glock you can use 9mm and 40 barrels on the 40's and change backstraps. Which would actually make a glock/m&p more modular.

You can't run a compact glock slide over a subcompact frame, and you can't get a .45 conversion kit for your 9mm. The nice thing about the Sig system is that you only go through the FFL once, after that you can get the remaining parts without restriction.

The 320 is becoming quite popular and there is a good possibility of after market grip frames becoming available. They are no more expensive then grips are and they could be configured in a wide variety of ways.

I'm a fan of the system. I bought my P250 without knowing or caring about the modularity - I just wanted a DAO subcompact that fit my hand, and the P250 was perfect. I've been able to collect a pile of used conversion parts since then, and it has become everything I could want from a single pistol.

 

[bscott29]

Thanks mikejackmin.
I think I really want one now, knowing that they do so much.

 

[RustyShackelford]

SIG triggers; P320 law enforcement ....

The SIG Sauer P320 line comes with 2 different trigger styles too.
One standard(one piece), the other trigger is like a Ruger SR pistol or Glock with a extra safety.
I think the Glock type safety may only be for sworn LE or qualified professionals but Id need to check.

I prefer the standard type P320 trigger. It looks safe & solid to me.

 

[9mmepiphany]

a full size for duty, a compact for carry and a sub for deep concealment.

Just for clarity, there are four (4) sizes of the SIG 320

[resize=500] [/resize]

 

[russianbear]

I am a fan of Sig Sauer have the new P227 Carry and MK-25 Navy,but after looking at both the New Sig 320 and the new HK VP9. I went with the HK VP9.

Not implying anything wrong with the Sig, just my feelings on what better fit my needs.

Here is a video I found on the military channel showing the Sig 320 being fired and details of it after 4,000 rounds fired,and close to the end details of how it's put together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ulcbvDeRqQ&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs

 

[DevsAdvocate]

The SIG Sauer P320 line comes with 2 different trigger styles too.
One standard(one piece), the other trigger is like a Ruger SR pistol or Glock with a extra safety.
I think the Glock type safety may only be for sworn LE or qualified professionals but Id need to check.

I prefer the standard type P320 trigger. It looks safe & solid to me.

It's optional IIRC, but this feature is the best one in my humble opinion. I think the P320 is the only striker pistol out there with a real solid trigger... everyone else as a tiny little blade thingy or rubber dong hanging off the bottom. Very unappealing and obsolete technology (using a trigger safety to act as a drop safety). Somehow, Sig found a way around it.

 

[Mainsail]

I like the concept of the P320 for a slightly different reason- CLEANING!

Just pull the FCG out of the frame and spray it with brake cleaner, let it dry, soak it in your favorite oil and let the excess drain off.

I'm holding out for the 10mm P320.

EDIT to add: I wonder about the legalities of dropping that FCG into something that's not a handgun- for example a carbine. Aftermarket manufacturers could theoretically build a carbine frame complete with barrel that you could buy through the mail. Now you drop your P320 FCG into that frame and you have a rifle that uses pistol magazines.

 

[adobewalls]

Very pleased with the full sized P320 in .40. A soft shooter for a 40.

 

[boatdoc173]

Hi

I am NO expert--far from it-- I seem to like most of my guns--H+K, cz beretta sig walther-- all make great guns and all function and feel different

this stuff is very personal but MHO is this

walther ppq is a bit better than H+K vp9--but almost no difference grip and feel wise--triggers are similar(I shoot 9mm by the way not .40 cal)--except the walther hits poa naturally, The H+K per usual requires a 12 o clock hold

Sig 320 feels and shoots well, glocks take time to get used to because of the grip angle and the cheap feeling trigger is not my favorite either--but they all go bang when the trigge r is pulled--the H+K and Walther feel the best to me

enjoy--whatever you buy --you will not be disappointed

 

[RustyShackelford]

SIG Sauer P320/P250 barrels, parts....

I was checking around on the SIG Store, the main source for items like pistol magazines, barrels, sights, grips, etc, etc...
I found it odd that SIG promotes the P320 series as a modular firearm and easy to change yet they do not sell a lot of stuff for the P320, .
The add on frames and parts only seem to come in SIG's factory black color. No OD or FDE(flat dark earth).
I'm curious to know too if SIG's P250 series barrels(which are available in different calibers & sizes) can quickly switch into the P320 pistols. If the SIG frames are all the same or have the exact same specs do the factory SIG barrels fit both models too?

Rusty

 

[boatdoc173]

I was checking around on the SIG Store, the main source for items like pistol magazines, barrels, sights, grips, etc, etc...
I found it odd that SIG promotes the P320 series as a modular firearm and easy to change yet they do not sell a lot of stuff for the P320, .
The add on frames and parts only seem to come in SIG's factory black color. No OD or FDE(flat dark earth).
I'm curious to know too if SIG's P250 series barrels(which are available in different calibers & sizes) can quickly switch into the P320 pistols. If the SIG frames are all the same or have the exact same specs do the factory SIG barrels fit both models too?

Rusty

Hi

not sure 100% about the P250 / P320 interchange BUT I know that th e p 250 magazines are used for the p320-- so I am guessing that since the frame is a p250 frame on that p320--all parts fit the p320 as they would the p250

\call sig cust service anyway--that is th e best way to confirm this

happy shooting

 

[snooperman]

I am a SIG fan and have 4 SIGs , but in a striker , I like the H&K VP9 much better.

 

[Crowcifier666]

RustyShackleford writes:

I found it odd that SIG promotes the P320 series as a modular firearm and easy to change yet they do not sell a lot of stuff for the P320, .

I've been researching the P320 as my next pistol purchase, but just came across a comment on the video review posted by russianbear. They claim Sig does not sell internal parts for the weapon. If you misplace or wear out a part the FCG has to go back to Sig.

I may wait it out until they start selling parts. Or until the .45 ACP comes out....

 

[bscott29]

I started this thread a while back. I decided not to get a 320 for a few reasons. To me there are no parts available to do all of this wonderful stuff that the sig supposedly does. Also with the calibers available there all like splitting hairs so why would I need more than one. The ability to go from a full size to compact is cool, but you can't go to a subcompact without buying even more parts. The compact is so darn blocky compared to a glock or m&p as well. While the grip feels really good in my hand it looks cheap. I'm sure there great pistols, but I went a different route.

 

[tomrkba]

I tried one at the store. It had the SIG grip angle that I like. The trigger pull was smooth and light. I thought it was too light, but it would certainly work well.

 

[Bamashooter]

I know the discussion is about the P320, but the P250 and P320 have a lot of common parts. I purchased a P250 in .45 acp based on the ability to easily change both calibers and grips pretty much at will, which is possible if you can find the kits at a reasonable price. I ordered a .357 sig conversion kit from Sig in Aug. 2014, after waiting 2 months I called Sig to check on the status. I was told by their customer service there was no purpose in calling that their main goal was new pistol production and when they had enough parts my conversion kit would be shipped. It did finally arrive in Feb. 2015. Yes you can buy some of the kits elsewhere for an exorbitant price, but that is not what Sig advertises. Just a heads up if changing calipers is a hope.

 

[50 Shooter]

What I don't understand is why anyone would buy the .40 and .357 Sig conversion kits separate? I plan on buying the .40 for mine and just a .357 Sig barrel as I can't see buying two kits.

 

[DevsAdvocate]

RustyShackleford writes:


I've been researching the P320 as my next pistol purchase, but just came across a comment on the video review posted by russianbear. They claim Sig does not sell internal parts for the weapon. If you misplace or wear out a part the FCG has to go back to Sig.

I may wait it out until they start selling parts. Or until the .45 ACP comes out....

Is this really that big of a deal? Like, how quickly do you expect to wear out parts on a Striker pistol? I feel that gun will probably out-live you.