Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sig P229/239 question for owners of both

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Olrocker, Jul 1, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Olrocker

    Olrocker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I'm thinking about getting a P239 to fill the size slot in my arsenal between a Kahr PM9 and a P229/.40. Do you guys who own both 229/239 find the 239 to be enough smaller than the 229 to warrant having both? I'm a recent Sig devotee and have a sneaking suspicion they're like potato chips...
     
  2. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I have owned both, and IMHO the 239 is much easier to carry around all day. However, I would recommend the 9mm variety, as I found the .40 to have too much muzzle flip.
     
  3. XLMiguel

    XLMiguel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    You're right about the potato chip analogy.

    To answer your question, IMO, the 239 is enough smaller to make it a worthwhile addition to your armory. I have a 225, 228, 226, and 239 (all 9mm), and find it to be a bit more concealable than the 22x's, but not by a whole lot. It is a sweet shooter, with all the raditional SIG attributes. I added night sights and Hogue walnut grips, it's among my favorites. HTH.
     
  4. Olrocker

    Olrocker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Thanks guys. I'm probably not going to be able to help myself. Two-tone, 9mm...here I come!
     
  5. grendelbane

    grendelbane Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    838
    Location:
    KY
    I have had a P239, a P226, a P245, and most recently, a P229.

    The P239 is the best combination of concealability, power, controllability, and accuracy of any SIG pistol I have ever shot. (I have shot P220s as well, but never owned one.

    Smaller than all of the above, and nearly as accurate as any of them, and more controllable than the P245.

    Mine is in 357 SIG, I have both 357 SIG and .40 barrels for my P229. I will probably break down and get a .40 barrel for the P239, but it also needs its own dedicated magazines.

    I have a friend with a 9mm P239. I don't think that you can go wrong with a P239 in any caliber.:D
     
  6. JNewell

    JNewell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Land of the Bean & the Cod
    Yes, it is smaller than the P229 by a greater margin than you'd guess looking at the numbers. I know that doesn't make a lot of sense...but it looks like I'm not the only one who feels that way.
     
  7. JoeRapture

    JoeRapture Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    62
    Location:
    Loganville, GA
    It's academic. Once you become a Sigaholic, it's not which Sig....it's when.

    Surrender. Resistance is futile.
     
  8. Jiml3

    Jiml3 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    430
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    I have the Sig P229 in 40mm and the Sig P239 in 9mm. I also have the Kahr
    PM9. The P229 is great for winter carry when it is easier to conceal and
    chambered in 40 S&W, it has a greater capacity to penetrate winter clothing.
    For hot summer and easy concealment, my preference is the Kahr PM9. For more temperate times the Sig P239 is better, but I prefer my CZ 75 PCR compact 9.
    They weigh about the same but the CZ is slimmer and carries 10 plus 1, versus
    6 plus 1 for the Sig.
     
  9. rappa

    rappa Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2003
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    Boynton Beach, FL USA
    I used to have a 229 .40 and 239 9mm. The 239 was definitely smaller and easier to carry. Carrying the 229 wasn't out of the question, I carried it sometimes. I carried IWB. The 239 was always first choice. Of course, the difference for me was obvious (.40 double stack vs. 9mm single stack). I don't know how the 239 .40 feels as CCW.

    Yes, they're like potato chips. Although, since I've never won the lottery or received an inheritence, in order to get a 220, I had to trade my 229. Which I haven't regretted at all!:D

    I sold my 239 as well. But made up for that by getting a 225!:D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page