Simple Poll

[CraigC]

...there are no clear winners.

That should tell you something.

 

[2zulu1]

I didn't vote, although I had a catastrophic failure with a new SIG P220 last year, I realize all three companies manufacture quality sidearms. Also, I don't have enough experience with H&K sidearms to make a conclusive choice.

 

[leadchucker]

Biased poll.

 

[Quentin]

I vote "other", no wait you won't let me.

I like the more complex polls!

 

[fastbolt]

No "None of the Above" option? Can't vote, then ...

 

[F-111 John]

Had to go Glock since there was no Smith & Wesson.

 

[TexasPatriot.308]

those seem to be your choices....ask for opinions from experienced shooters....those 3 might not even make our final cut.

 

[zignal_zero]

From those limited choices, Sig (which seems to be being said a lot)

 

[Magnuumpwr]

This is my vote.

Took a picture of my Glocks playing ring around the 17.

 

[M1key]

of the three, I "like" Glock the best: price point, reliability, durability, model and caliber selection, customer service

YMMV

M

 

[Got_Lead?]

I voted SIG because I just love my 220, and it has a vary nice feel to shoot. But I also know a Glock is a much better design for durability, and they shoot nice too.

 

[PabloJ]

Have owned multiple of all three, HK is just special

Oh yes, they are twice as good as the Glock. The price alone dictates this.