Simulator Experience

Status
Not open for further replies.

willbrink

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
605
Tried it at a local place that uses one for their course required to get an LTC.* Ever used a shooting simulator? This was my first time, and it was a blast. Worlds best video game. Does a simulator replace range time? Of course not, but it also allows you to do many things you cant do at a range, either for practical reasons or safety reasons or both. I could see taking a course based on the simulator as being another worthy tool in the tool box as there is an endless amount of scenarios and such that can be thrown at you.

My first thought of course was “I gotta get me one of these!” That was tempered a bit once I learned the cost of the set up (10k or so) but if you figured what you could save in ammo, it could be done at home, and what it could add to your shooting abilities, might still be worth it! I recommend everyone try one of these gizmos at least once.

Most interesting to me is the gun. I had expected the let down of a simulator to be a lack of realism with the gun. However, the gun is a stock Glock handgun (forget the model #) thats got a specialized barrel and other gizmos that are driven by high pressure air. The result is, recoil is essentially like shooting a 9mm Glock with approx noise level as if you had your ears on. So, the actual shooting experience has the realism needed there.

FAS is supposed to have more advanced courses using the simulator and I can see it would be of value as one more tool in the tool box for LEO (some of whom have depts. Already using simulators) and civilians looking for additional training and experiences. Of course mil has been using simulators f all kinds for years.

The only real draw back of a simulator is obvious: it’s a tool, and a potentially good one, but can NEVER replace range time, etc.

* www.massfirearmsschool.com

Why I was there: Went to Mass Fire Arms school with GF for her required course to get her LTC (on Valentines day no less!) as owner of MFS offered to let me play with the simulator. My GF is from the Midwest and has been to the range with me, etc, so she’s not new to guns per se. I think she out shot the men in the class... Once she was told their were no ammo limits to the simulator, she used the modified Glock more like an SMG and just ripped across BGs. Proud moments…I was calling her “Uzi Annie” all the way home ‘till I was told to “shut up”, but I digress....:)
 
I agree that they make a good training tool. I've only used one once. That was during a concealed carry class, everybody got to run one scenario on it. I was surprised how it got my adrenaline going.

I would say that IDPA style shooting is another great training opportunity.
 
I would say that IDPA style shooting is another great training opportunity
.

IMHO BS.

I've done the Simulator several times; it's awesome.

Thr person running the program can change the Scenarios with a couple of key strokes.

He always messes with me...


B]Example:[/B]

Open the trunk and find a hostage, or open the trunk and find a BG with a gun.
 
I got psyched for a moment - thinking you were referring to something else.

So, i'll digress from the OP topic....

In the movie Ronin, DeNiro's character makes reference to a "simulator" - which makes a rifle sound like a pistol. I'd like to know more about these, if anyone can shed some light?
 
Re: Simulator Experience
Yes I have, though it has been sometime.

I kept getting the Female VCA's.
Which was fine, with me, just the first pair of Male VCAs sorta surprised me.

I also was a bit "quick" on the one set up where the girl has the gun in her purse and is moving toward the male , for him to retrieve the gun.
"Bit Quick" means I shot the male's hand while in the purse and therefore got the girl too.

"Twofers" is not really how they score that one...*whups*
 
Only did while we were getting ready to convoy into Iraq. It was very interesting, and enlightening on the decision making process.
 
PressCheck said:
Quote:
I would say that IDPA style shooting is another great training opportunity
.

IMHO BS.

I've done the Simulator several times; it's awesome.

I agree simulators are awesome. They are great for helping prepare people mentally. I'm not sure why you're saying IDPA is BS. I understand the simulator is superior in forcing you to make decisions on how you would respond in certain situations. But IDPA is a great way to learn how to use your weapon efficiently while under some kind of pressure. I think they complement each other.
 
I have gotten to use them in past. I agree I would LOVE to have more access to them. I wonder why more ranges don't set them up?
 
I have gotten to use them in past. I agree I would LOVE to have more access to them. I wonder why more ranges don't set them up?

Demand, and expense. Only reasons I can think of, but they are the ones that drive businesses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top