darkhelmet
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7
there's a thread elsewhere by someone who finds he's hitting low. he describes a six o'clock hold. his glock is sighted for what others are calling a "combat hold".
i don't know proper terminology, but the sights are set so that the top of the sight blades should lie on the equator of the bull.
aren't sights set for a six o'clock hold inherently limited to known distance and known circumference of bull? in other words, at ten yards, i can't expect the same result with this hold using a five inch bull and a ten inch bull.
the advantage of the other sight setting ("combat hold?") is that you are always aiming at dead center no matter what the distance and no matter what the size of the bull.
at "combat distances", against an actual foe, either would yield a COM hit. but if you're going for precision, the six o'clock hold requires judgement or fore knowledge about the distance and size of the target. the other hold doesn't.
enlighten me o' THR. the six o'clock hold seems to be preferred by many. but i can't see why.
i don't know proper terminology, but the sights are set so that the top of the sight blades should lie on the equator of the bull.
aren't sights set for a six o'clock hold inherently limited to known distance and known circumference of bull? in other words, at ten yards, i can't expect the same result with this hold using a five inch bull and a ten inch bull.
the advantage of the other sight setting ("combat hold?") is that you are always aiming at dead center no matter what the distance and no matter what the size of the bull.
at "combat distances", against an actual foe, either would yield a COM hit. but if you're going for precision, the six o'clock hold requires judgement or fore knowledge about the distance and size of the target. the other hold doesn't.
enlighten me o' THR. the six o'clock hold seems to be preferred by many. but i can't see why.