Sks vs. 223 autoloader?

Status
Not open for further replies.

floorit76

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
615
I have a Norinko sks that currently wears a cheapo non folding folder, and a few 30 round mags. I still have the original wood and mag, but the forearm guard split. I have a bolt gun in 223, and would like to sell the sks to free up some cash to put towards a 223 autoloader. I am considering either a Mini-14, Kel-tec Su16, or some form of AR. I like the idea of only needing to stock up on one common cartridge that can be used in either gun. I like the looks of some kind of M4 configured AR, but not sure about op-rod or direct imp. I like the portability of the Kel-tec. But I am most likely ot find a good deal on a used mini-14. Throw me some oppinions please.
 
Even with the rough condition of the forearm guard, the sks will likely be worth more in stock configuration. Some pictures would help.
 
One possibility ( not being crass ) is to find a new forearm grip for your SKS and put it back into original config and then save a bit and get an AR in 7.62x39. Ammo commonality is solved.
 
I'm not looking for a value on the sks, pretty sure I already have an idea. Just opinions on the weapons listed. Thanks thought. For my purposes the 7.62 has little advantage over the 223.
 
If you have the money, go for the AR. Quite a bit better rifle than the Mini-14 or Kel Tec. Only problem with the AR is that there are so many manufactures these days I can't keep track of which are good and which are bad. I would go with a direct impingement system though. Too many problems with the piston conversions.
 
I would absolutely go for a low end AR like the S&W Sport over the Mini-14. The cost is getting to the point where it is a non-issue. When Ar's were twice the price of a Mini, I could see why someone would go with the Mini 14. Forget about piston AR's if that is what you are debating. There is nothing wrong with the standard AR design.
 
Reliability would be my number one goal. I have the 700 if I need accuracy. How about some recomendations for a reliable, M4 type AR that won't break the bank. I may even even tackle assembleing my own, if I knew what parts to pick up.
 
Keep the SKS. You will regret selling it. It won't generate very much cash and you'll need at least $1,000 to $1,200 for a solid AR-15. Since reliability is your priority, look at Colt and Bravo Company at the minimum. Bravo Company Manufacturing makes very good guns and you can get their Midlength Mod 0 for around $1,050. It lacks the pony on the side, but you can find Colt 6920's anywhere between $1,100 and $1,300.
 
I just have too many un-used guns in the safe already. I haven't shot the sks in years. I'm trying to pair it down into a more managable, and easier to feed pile.
 
The S&W sport sure has a tempting price. What parts do they "skimp" on to account for a $1000 price spread in AR's?

And to add to that, is it easier/cheaper to buy a middle of the road carbine, then add the better parts later on. Or is true reliability only going to come from a factory or experienced builder?
 
Last edited:
Buy an AR of your choice. With todays prices you can get a much better rifle than the Mini-14 for less money.
 
My opinion:
I have a mini14. It is reliable and shoots all 5.56/223 ammo that I've put into it. Nothing fancy but good enough for defensive and range duties.

I had a SU-16. Pretty reliable ate most every 5.56/223 round I put into it. But the trigger guard split at 300 rounds and I wasn't to comfortable with the remaining overall construction. This is not to say it was unsafe or dangerous, it just didn't feel right in my hands.

I have a couple of ARs. I have put together some others for friends/family. They are plenty good enough for defensive and range duties. They're modular; meaning you can add/exchange parts to your heart's (and wallet's) content. And they are easy to put together.

Putting the accuracy issues aside, I can put together a new AR cheaper than buying a new Mini14. AR15 .com has detailed directions on how to do so.

Her are some sites to help you:
http://palmettostatearmory.com/

http://www.stagarms.com/

http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/
 
I agree, invest in an AR. Think of it as a Lego set for adults! You can upgrade it as you need/want.

As for the DI vs. Piston issue, I've had both and kept the piston guns....I'm not sure if any of the "problems" that people so quickly point out, apply to people who don't torture their guns to failure. I have thousands of rounds through both of mine and the only problem I've ever had was my fault! I was running the gun too dry.

The piston guns ARE more expensive but don't rule them out because someone says they have "too many problems".
 
Thanks guys, the AR really is starting to sound good. Still not sure about which opperating system thought. I'm not the kind that enjoys cleaning weapons. I do what needs done, but it isn't "fun" for me like it is for others. To put it bluntly, op rod guns don't seem to "poop where they eat" for no better way to phrase it. Am I seeing things wrong?
 
I've owned both, and still own the AR. Its a better design, its a lot lighter (major point there), and more accurate. Between the two its no contest. The SKS basically filled a void as my autoloading rifle in the safe until I could afford an AR.
 
To put it bluntly, op rod guns don't seem to "poop where they eat" for no better way to phrase it. Am I seeing things wrong?

I didn't make any comment about that aspect but IMO, you are correct. I can spend a day at the range and burn a few hundred rounds, come home and the BCG is still clean. I might have to clean the front of the bolt to remove any residue from the cases but other than that, the cleaning is pretty much the chamber, barrel and the gas block. Oh, and you might have to take a rag to the inside of the hand guard.

Another nice thing is the gun runs cooler. The heat isn't transferred to the BCG and there isn't a gas tube to make the handguard hot. Just my own observations.
 
I'd say build an AR. They are pretty easy to build i.e., put together the lower, buy a complete upper. Palmetto State Armory has pretty good prices on components. I wouldn't worry about piston ARs. Adds to the cost with no big increase in benefit.

An alternative might be a Saiga in 223. Comparatively inexpensive, reliable AK action. Can be converted into a pistol grip AK.
 
I'm not the kind that enjoys cleaning weapons. I do what needs done, but it isn't "fun" for me like it is for others.

You need to read this article on "filthy 14". I also have a BCM 14.5" middy and it gets cleaned annually (after ~2.5K rounds). Quality AR-15's can be VERY reliable.
 
You need to read this article on "filthy 14". I also have a BCM 14.5" middy and it gets cleaned annually (after ~2.5K rounds). Quality AR-15's can be VERY reliable.
Interesting article but IMHO, all I saw was an ad for Slip 2000 and Bravo Company. :scrutiny:

I agree with your statement " Quality AR-15's can be VERY reliable", but it makes no sense to me to pay the prices these guns command and then play the "It's not really dirty" card. :confused:

After 400-500 rounds, DI guns are DIRTY and powder residue is everywhere! I would be embarrassed to show a friend any of my guns and then have them need to wash their hands afterward.

That's just my opinion....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top