I'm always a bit skeptical when I hear tales of such exceptionally tight groups from an AK or SKS, regardless of the sights. IMO, garnered from a more-than-middlin' amount of observation and shooting experience with several examples of both and reems of published data from professional sources more knowledgable than myself, even the most heavily and expensively breathed-upon example of either fired by a World-class competition marksman would be hard pressed indeed to match some of them on any given day.
According to Marc Krebs, who makes perhaps the finest custom AKs extent, 2 1/2-3" for five shots at 100 M is about the best average that the design can be made to deliver. The insurmountable problem, again according to him, lies in the design of the gas system. In the AK system, there are always parts having considerable mass in-motion while the bullet is still in the barrel. These have one or more points of contact with parts in hard contact with the barrel during the firing cycle. The contact is random, and will affect the harmonic vibration pattern of the barrel differently with each shot, even with the best ammunition.
The SKS design suffers from the same basic flaw, if to a rather lesser extent as the mass in-motion is somewhat less and not directly attached to the bolt carrier. IMO&E, it is an exceptional SKS which will consistently deliver sub 2 1/2" groups for five shots at 100 M with its favorite ammo.
Also MO, but with most generic ammo brands and a marksman of reasonable skill 4-4 1/2" would be more representitive for either.
A high-quality aftermarket sight which increases the sight radius significantly, such as the Tech-200, would no doubt be of great help in extracting the best performance that a particular rifle and marksman combo might be capable of. In the hands of a good marksman, from a solid rest and with quality ammo, 2 3/4" for ten shots at 100 M, while still exceptional, would not be out of the question for some well-fitted SKS carbines.
I still believe that expecting this level of performance from your average SKS is pretty much setting oneself up for a major let-down. Expecting it from the average mil-config AK would make me wonder what one had been smoking.
As the late Colonel once said, "Marksmanship isn't what you did once; it's what you can deliver on-demand." Drawing conclusions about what one should expect to be able to deliver from a given weapon based on what someone else claims to have done once strikes me something to try and avoid.