WestKentucky
Member
I understand my posts can be terribly long and boring, but I already stated that.
Most technical writing is very dry, and it takes a fair bit of verbiage to accurately and thoroughly describe what is being detailed. As a Safety professional, I fully appreciate this as the material I cover is similar in that a lot of it is technically boring and takes a fair bit of verbiage to explain. You do a great job of walking the thin line between being thorough and being wordy. Just the right amount of detail, and generally incredible pictures as illustrations. It can’t be said enough how much I , and I know others as well, appreciate your posts. You are essentially a revolver historian on this forum and your knowledge, verbiage, and photography skills come together in a way that serves our group very well. Thank you for your many contributions.
And to the OP… that revolver is what I look for. Guns affordable enough and worn enough to not be troubling to shoot. It won’t lose value, it’s solid enough to not be dangerous, and it is a very nice piece of history. I hope to find one similar some day.