philobeddoe
Member
I think the governor overplayed his hand.
Howso? The entire state is corrupt. Game over. The NRA, etc won't do squat...and any federal lawsuit will get delayed, etc - especially since the state has more or less unlimited funds to defend itself with.I think the governor overplayed his hand.
I'm so pissed off right now. With the stroke of a pen I'm now a criminal?
How the hell is anyone going to enforce a magazine ban? 10 rounds is now high capacity? This is silly.
And I'm reading conflicting info. This says that the 10rd mags are grandfathered in but you can only put 7 rounds in it, LMAO
http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/...-but-no-deal-for-vote-tonight/#comment-575938
I think you could have done without the first two words of that statement and came off as much more professional, being that you are a mod and all...Quit complaining and contact your state firearms associations and NRA and ACLU and start to work on making this the quickest overturn in history.
I think you could have done without the first two words of that statement and came off as much more professional, being that you are a mod and all...
This proposed law is so over-reaching that a good argument can be made that it breaches the lines of the Heller/McDonald cases. I expect it to be instantly challenged in court.
While the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms,
the Supreme Court has said that that right is "not unlimited."
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 595, 626 (2008). In the
Heller case, the Supreme Court explained, "nothing in our opinion
should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the
possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws
forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as
schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and
qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." 554 U.S. at 626-27.
The Court also recognized there is a "historical tradition of
prohibiting the carrying of 'dangerous and unusual' weapons."
You'd think so. However the summary of the Bill that I read actually referenced Heller as supporting precedent.
Tinpig
Welcome to Texas, you won't miss that NY at all.I lived in NY (upstate) for 50 years and chose to vote with my feet. I took my "in demand" job and relocated to El Paso. The best part is that I got an instant 7% raise....no state income tax. To hell with NYC, Andrew Cuomo, and Mayor B. I am now enjoying legal suppressors, autos, and a great community of people.
Vote with your feet and hurt them with economics!
Why do New Yorkers need to move? And you can't run forever ...Eagle-101 said:Vote with your feet!
Unconstitutional laws aren't laws
I don't why they didn't make it ten. a lot of companies already make 10 round magazines as an option, because of California's magazine laws. What, is New York trying to one up us in stupidity?
Only for the next year. After that they are illegal to have.We can still have ten round magazines, but can only put 7 rounds into it.
As long as it does not have a magazine interlock you can still use it as a single shot!I sure hope the bad guys will do the same.
As a N.Y.C. resident it will be interesting to see if the N.Y.P.D will require FACTORY 7 round magazines for handguns.
If so my G19, Browning HP and M&P 45 will soon be illegal.
I agree with (hso); Quit complaining & get off your back sides & do something about it.......I think you could have done without the first two words of that statement and came off as much more professional, being that you are a mod and all...
How in the hell can they ban pre '94 mags?????? Pretty sure that is unconstitutional without compensation. I smell a court case coming.
How many amendments does New York ignore?
The 2nd and 14th are now just suggestions that can be ignored at the whim of the state government?
how is this going to effect the suppliers located there. will outfits like GunPartsCorp be able to retain their inventory in state or will they be forced to move.