Flashpoint
Member
There are a lot of threads everywhere talking about the effectiveness of one caliber over another. From what I have seen it boils down to two types of people. One type of people being the "Lots of rounds, fast bullet" cheering for the 9MM. The second being the "Big bullet knocks big holes and has smaller risk of over penetration" people cheering for the .45 cal ACP. I have found very few if any people claiming the .40 cal S&W to be there round of choice. Most people don't have anything good to say about the round. So what's the point of the round being used, or even developed. Also if so many people consider it such an unnecessary or inferior round why do so many LEOs us it.
Disclaimer: The above description of the two types of people is not the end all be all. Just a general description of what I have noticed.
I will not put on my flack jacket and flame suit.
Croyance,
Thanks for catching what my tired eyes and spell checker did not.
Disclaimer: The above description of the two types of people is not the end all be all. Just a general description of what I have noticed.
I will not put on my flack jacket and flame suit.
Croyance,
Thanks for catching what my tired eyes and spell checker did not.
Last edited: