JImbothefiveth
Member
Sort of. I think the case didn't say a nunchuka wasn't a second amendment right, I think the case just guesses it is and says that the second amendment is not a fundamental right.Which is the fundamental right to own a nunchuka, right?
You can make a pretty good case for the 10th. How is it the 9th has been infringed though? It's a very vauge amendment, and all it says is that just because a right isn't mentioned in the constitution doesn't mean you can't have it.The 2nd has not been infringed upon nearly as much as the 9th and 10th have.