SourMash
Member
Can someone please explain what standard deviation is in simple terms?
In short, take your data...say the velocity of 20 rounds. Average the 20 velocities. Now determine the delta of each separate velocity relative to the average. Take an average of the deltas and you basically have your standard deviation.
So, for velocities from a chronometer, for example, a small SD (say, in the teens) shows that there is very little variance between one round and the next, and you probably have a nice accurate load there. But I let the chrono's calculator do all the mathematical heavy lifting.The smaller the standard deviation, the more similar the measurements are.
Torque - - can someone explain torque to me!!!!
Torque - - can someone explain torque to me!!!! BWAHAHAHA Just kidding folks..
The Dove
I find it odd that ALL of my velocities for EVERY load I've ever tested fall within the mean +/- 2 standard deviations.
DickM said:It's likely just an artifact of your sample size not being large enough.
DickM said:Now if what you're saying is that bullet velocities don't follow a normal distribution, then that's different.
DickM said:Well, let me start by saying that you couldn't be more wrong about the properties of normal distributions not being well understood
1858 said:I personally don't think that "the properties of the normal distribution are very well understood" when it comes to bullet velocites and statistical implications for long-range shooting.
. . . I'm here to be enlightened so if you can better my understanding by relating statistical methods to real-world results and implications then I'm all ears.
DickM said:Now if what you're saying is that bullet velocities don't follow a normal distribution, then that's different. All of the chrono data I've looked at, including your data, do not deviate significantly from normal. That's not the same as saying they actually are normal, but usually after doing the appropriate tests and finding no reason to believe they're not normal (or whatever alternate distribution we think they might be) we proceed along assuming that they are normal. We'll be wrong from time to time, and the tests for normality tell us exactly how often we'll be wrong (but not exactly when, unfortunately). All I can say is that all the tests I've done indicate that normality is an appropriate assumption for populations of bullet velocities - I'll accept that that might be incorrect (but I honestly don't think so).
DickM said:I tried to do that, but you seem to only want to argue about it, attempting to support that argument with pseudostatistical gibberish. Adios.