ravinraven
Member
The gun relativity of this is in the fact that it is a rights grab.
I heard on FOX that in Washington in at least one county the Watermelons [green on the outside and red on the inside] have managed to get an unconstitutional law thru to keep you from using your own land. You are supposed to leave 65% of it untouched and can only use 10% of it.
Anyone from the area have anything more specific on this?
If you buy land with prior restrictions that's one thing. If land grabs are introduced after you buy it it is a good reason to ... well, never mind. Y'all know what I'm gonna say anyway.
But you can easily see the gun relevance.
rr
I heard on FOX that in Washington in at least one county the Watermelons [green on the outside and red on the inside] have managed to get an unconstitutional law thru to keep you from using your own land. You are supposed to leave 65% of it untouched and can only use 10% of it.
Anyone from the area have anything more specific on this?
If you buy land with prior restrictions that's one thing. If land grabs are introduced after you buy it it is a good reason to ... well, never mind. Y'all know what I'm gonna say anyway.
But you can easily see the gun relevance.
rr