Stay with 9mm Glock or add .40sw to the party?

What would you do?

  • Glock 19

    Votes: 71 44.1%
  • Glock 17

    Votes: 44 27.3%
  • Glock 23 + 9mm Conversion Barrel

    Votes: 33 20.5%
  • Glock 22 + 9mm Conversion Barrel

    Votes: 13 8.1%

  • Total voters
    161
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Gen3 G23 with the LWD 40-9mm conversion and LWD 357 Sig drop-in. It shoot all very well with the proviso that it prefers at least a 124g 9mm bullet (with 9mm mags of course). No other mods. BUT... I carry it with the stock G23 40 S&W barrel in it. Because of legal reasons if involved in an SD situation. I live in AZ and if the cops don't charge you, there is no civil suit. But I still keep it legally conservative. This is just something to consider if you want a third party barrel for EDC.
 
I've gen 3 G23 (.40) for carry, and don't appreciate the need for a conversion kit to next up or down caliber. Lot of money for little difference.
Have a Browning Buckmark (.22 LR). Dirt cheap to shoot, great when cant afford the .40 ammo.
If I felt the need or urge, I could customize either a lot, but really? I'd rather spend my money on ammo. That's what works for me. As always, your mileage may vary.
 
As far as performance goes with todays ammunition, 9mm and .40 are very similar (imo) and the only difference you will notice is in recoil. For the added cost of the more expensive .40 ammo you will gain the benefit of being slightly more versatile in what calibers you can fire. It wouldnt be worth it to me. I voted for Glock 17. The main reason i edc a glock 22 is because where i live they're a dime a dozen used.
 
Somehow 147 does not equal 200 grains, and that's a pretty big difference. Also the .40 case is a bit larger for more powder then the 9mm.
Odd part is I have a 9, but no .40.
 
I had two G19's at one time. I sold them both and bought a G23, it was the biggest gun mistake I regret. Those G19's are one of the best handguns available IMO. The G23 kicks too hard, plus, unless you have money to burn, adding another caliber to the mix takes away from having enough ammo for the other handguns.

I never shot the G17 that well, and I have large hands, go figure.
 
So? It's still a Glock, and, other then the 34-35, the triggers suck, big time.
 
So? It's still a Glock, and, other then the 34-35, the triggers suck, big time.

What's so bad about them?

They don't have overly heavy or long pulls. They aren't gritty, they break cleanly and have a short reset. I'm no fan boy, but I do admit to enjoying the trigger pull on Glocks.
 
I had the same dilemma about a year ago, but in reverse. After countless hours of contemplation and reading hundreds of threads, I bought a G23. I loved the platform except for one small issue..........recoil.
I've broken my right hand twice and the snappy .40 was honestly hurting me. That along with the fact that I had to buy different ammunition for my beloved Kahr CW9 led me to trade the 23 for a 19.
I'm more accurate, comfortable, and able to shoot quite a bit more with the 19. Having one caliber across the board is a benefit that you seem to already realize. I say go with the 19. If you want more capacity then use the Glock 17 or 18 mags.

Just my $0.02, which no longer matters due to inflation ;)
 
"Glock 23 + 9mm Conversion Barrel"

Definitely the way to go!

People get that so they can carry .40 and practice with 9mm? I've never understood that. You should practice with what you carry. If you are not willing to cough up the extra dough for ammo and learn the recoil of the .40 than get a 9mm.
 
People get that so they can carry .40 and practice with 9mm? I've never understood that. You should practice with what you carry. If you are not willing to cough up the extra dough for ammo and learn the recoil of the .40 than get a 9mm.

Its no different than practicing with .38 and carrying .357. Realistically, trigger time makes you good. Shoot enough of even .22LR per week and you'll be a better shot with centerfires too - even though the recoil is completely different. This isn't a chest-thumping contest where you need to "earn" the right to shoot a .40. Practice with the 9mm will work just fine.

Oh, and I can pretty much GUARANTEE you that the guy that shoots 300 rounds of practice fodder per range trip will outshoot the guy shooting 50 rounds per trip "practicing with what he carries" every time.
 
This isn't a chest-thumping contest where you need to "earn" the right to shoot a .40. Practice with the 9mm will work just fine.

No chest bumping here, I'm a 9mm guy all the way.

I just don't understand why people who see the value of having a 9mm conversion kit don't just carry 9mm. Is it really that hard to loose that extra mm?
 
I own a g22, wonderful gun, a true battle pistol. 40 is my favorite caliber. Get a g22 or g23 you will not be disappointed.
 
Well, ya obviously need to buy a 40SW so you can see for yourself. But I'd hold off on the 9mm conversion barrel. You already have a G26, so use that for 9mm!
 
I voted G17...stick with 9mm, and full size would compliment your subcompact.

Had a couple guns in .40 (Sig 239 and a G27......never loved that cartridge)
 
Prosser on page one does make a good point. With the interchangability of Glock bbls, especially with the .40 frame, you could go .40, .357 Sig, & 9mm.

I see a lot of talk about the .40 being harder to shoot because of increased recoil. Fellas it's not a .44 Mag. I carried one on duty for 5 years before I retired. I taught them as an assistant rangemaster, & shot them a lot with issue ammo (180gr), they are not that hard to shoot well. They will shoot well too. Off a rest it's not real hard to keep hits on a man size target out to 100 yards.
I'd pick the .40 & go with interchangable bbls.
Frank
 
There is no velocity advantage. The .40 is a bigger case, can take more powder, and move the bullets faster. With heavy bullets, for caliber, the velocity range is the same, or the 9 is slower.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top