GhostlyKarliion
Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2006
- Messages
- 426
Ok, this might sound dumb, but I have a question regarding regulation of bullets.
Over the past several years I have heard many references to ranges not allowing steel bullets to be used on their range. I suppose this is because their backstop isn't rated for it. But, what-have-you.
Now, the strange thing is, and I have never heard this before so please be advised that it is complete hearsay... I was told today that it was illegal to use steel jacketed or cored bullets for hunting, something about over penetration. I have known for years that you couldn't use full metal-jacketed bullets, but supposedly according to some new restriction, all steel jacketed and steel cored bullets were off limits.
Previous to this? I had another individual tell me that milsurp ammo (FMJ steel core rounds) were equivalently armor piercing and thus so regulated.
Now, my BS meter went off the chart at that, but maybe I missed something. I buy 7.62x54r by the ammo can, and steel core FMJ is the only way I know of get it.
As if that wasn't enough, another scenario was suggested that has caused me to ponder. A friend and myself had an idea, we both enjoy the thrill of full auto fire, however neither of us have the funds to invest in a machine gun. Queue the idea... would it be legal to manufacture a device that was capable of sustained automatic ignition of cartridges, but was incapable of actually firing a bullet? Would this device be classified as a firearm under BATFE rules?
Is there any merit to these claims that;
(1) Steel jacketed and or cored ammunition is now illegal for use in hunting?
(2) Steel jacketed and or cored ammunition is now considered armor piercing and so regulated.?
(3) It would be legal to build a device that would fire in full auto mode, but be incapable of launching a bullet into flight?
Over the past several years I have heard many references to ranges not allowing steel bullets to be used on their range. I suppose this is because their backstop isn't rated for it. But, what-have-you.
Now, the strange thing is, and I have never heard this before so please be advised that it is complete hearsay... I was told today that it was illegal to use steel jacketed or cored bullets for hunting, something about over penetration. I have known for years that you couldn't use full metal-jacketed bullets, but supposedly according to some new restriction, all steel jacketed and steel cored bullets were off limits.
Previous to this? I had another individual tell me that milsurp ammo (FMJ steel core rounds) were equivalently armor piercing and thus so regulated.
Now, my BS meter went off the chart at that, but maybe I missed something. I buy 7.62x54r by the ammo can, and steel core FMJ is the only way I know of get it.
As if that wasn't enough, another scenario was suggested that has caused me to ponder. A friend and myself had an idea, we both enjoy the thrill of full auto fire, however neither of us have the funds to invest in a machine gun. Queue the idea... would it be legal to manufacture a device that was capable of sustained automatic ignition of cartridges, but was incapable of actually firing a bullet? Would this device be classified as a firearm under BATFE rules?
Is there any merit to these claims that;
(1) Steel jacketed and or cored ammunition is now illegal for use in hunting?
(2) Steel jacketed and or cored ammunition is now considered armor piercing and so regulated.?
(3) It would be legal to build a device that would fire in full auto mode, but be incapable of launching a bullet into flight?