Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sticker Shock

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Dienekes, Jan 10, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dienekes

    Dienekes Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,905
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Speaking strictly for myself, the prices for decent handguns are getting up to where they're easy to walk away from these days. No doubt I'm a little spoiled, having bought my first Ruger .22 for $25 used in 1959; but Ruger's 2003 catalogue now lists it for $289. Best price in the area is $219 which is not too bad; but the same store has a new M10 Smith for, as I recall, about $450.

    A guy used to be able to pick up a new toy periodically and either make a keeper out of it or eventually trade it off; but either way it wasn't quite a budget killer. Now I find myself wondering how the average guy with the average responsibilities and bills does this anymore.

    It'll be interesting to see if this plays out, as it's still quite possible to live happily ever after with one or two well chosen guns. (Subversive thought for the day.)
     
  2. WonderNine

    WonderNine member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,331
    Location:
    always offline!
    Seems like all of the metal quality guns are getting more and more expensive while the combat tupperware is getting cheaper and cheaper.
     
  3. Mal H

    Mal H Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,056
    Location:
    Somewhere in the woods of Northern VA
    Adjusting for inflation from 1959 to present, your $25 used Ruger would cost roughly $190 today. Sounds about right to me. But I do agree that prices are rising faster than can be accounted for by inflation. Reasons: legal issues, better and more costly materials, taxes, etc. Reason they shouldn't be rising as fast: sloppy workmanship.

    I hope you kept that old Ruger for your collection. IIRC, that is the first year of production for it (or was it 1958?).
     
  4. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    Mal H, I'd have to agreee: Inflation adjustment,litigation, and taxes.
    You don't have to be older to see this in many goods and services.
    However,firearms do hold their value-appreciate if you will, much better than some items one could spend money on today.

    $250 spent on a good used revolver or $500 on a hand held electronic gadget. In 5 years the revolver will appreciate and still function...the gadget...well
     
  5. Mal H

    Mal H Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,056
    Location:
    Somewhere in the woods of Northern VA
    Good [reverse] analogy on guns vs electronics. Electronics to me are throw-aways. If it breaks, they're so cheap today you just go get another one which will, in most cases, be better and even cheaper than the one you had. Certainly not true for guns.

    Think how much a good, relatively cheap, TV from today would cost in 1959, even if the technology existed then to build one from existing components. Hundreds of thousands? Millions? Anybody else buy one of the new HP calculators when they first came out? Same thing today would cost a buck fifty.

    Another reason to add to the guns-are-getting-more-expensive list: supply and demand. Lot fewer manufacturers today.
     
  6. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    I've been told, by contacts at both Glock and Smith & Wesson, that between 20% and 25% of the manufacturer's cost price for a firearm is legal insurance and litigation costs. Ghastly thought, isn't it? :banghead:
     
  7. Glockorama

    Glockorama Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    249
    Location:
    Washington
    I thought the Ruger MK1 came out in 1949. Am I mistaken? :confused:
     
  8. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,524
    I have problems with big sticker prices too. I'm shocked to see handguns at $700. I've paid $1k, but that was for a customized Bob Chow with ivory grips. Generally I prefer used guns as the shock isn't so great.
     
  9. Brad Johnson

    Brad Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,076
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    Things may cost more, but the rise is generally offset by increased income.

    I can remember when Cokes were a dime and you could send a family of five to the picture show for under $10 - popcorn and all. I can also remember my parents talking about someone with a $5000-per-year salary like it was a sin to make that much money.

    It's like Paul Harvey said - "It may cost more dollars to live, but those dollars are much easier to make."

    Brad
     
  10. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    How much were you getting an hour back in '59?
     
  11. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    Sticker shock is why it usually takes me months to decide on a new gun...sometimes a used gun will be bought on impulse for the relative savings, but still takes some manipulating of the budget.
     
  12. GW45

    GW45 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    84
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Working at the gun counter - I have seen the prices go up - on all makes and models. Sig went up about $70 here....H&K are said to be going up soon.

    Also the more popular the gun or company gets - the more they charge - that's just the way it is.

    Look at Kimber - they weren't $750 a 1911 when they first came out.....

    As the years past they will continue to go up with inflation and the cost of living.......almost hate to see what my grand kids are going to pay for one.......
     
  13. cdbeaver

    cdbeaver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    473
    Location:
    Tekamah, Nebraska
    Ruger introduction

    Mal H: I purchased my first automatic pistol (a Ruger standard model with fixed sights) in either 1949 or 1950. If I recall correctly, it had a three-digit serial number and retailed for $37.50. My new-in-box gun cost me $30. It was called, at the time, a Sturm-Ruger.

    And no, dang it, I didn't keep it. But I just recently gave away the box it came in.
     
  14. Dave R

    Dave R Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,628
    Location:
    Idaho
    Seom thoughts on how to deal with sticker shock:

    1) Buy used.

    2) Buy clones (where appropriate, Beretta vs. Taurus, Bersa vs. Walther PPK, etc.)

    3) Buy a Makarov.
     
  15. PlayTheAces

    PlayTheAces Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    408
    Location:
    The Silver State
    As others have mentioned, I think it's all relative. The price of a new car is probably 10 to 12 times what it was in '59, and real estate has probably gone up even more.

    Insurance back then probably only covered manufacturer defects. Now we have to add today's victim mentality into the equation as well. Somebody accidently shoots themself today and it can't possibly be their own fault. We'll have to sue the manufacturer. Welcome to the 21st Century!
     
  16. Kahr carrier

    Kahr carrier Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    2,060
    Location:
    WESTSIDE
    Buying used is cool ,But in the Prk some people ask high prices on some of the guns not on the approved list ,Scalpers market.:)
     
  17. Mal H

    Mal H Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,056
    Location:
    Somewhere in the woods of Northern VA
    Glockorama and cdbeaver - Yes! 1949. Oh how the years are starting to blur. But what's a decade here or there among friends? ;)

    Actually when I said that about 1959, something didn't sound right about it at that time because I bought my first Mk I in 1964 and it didn't seem like it was a fairly new model then.
     
  18. txgolfer45

    txgolfer45 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Texas
    "Seems like all of the metal quality guns are getting more and more expensive while the combat tupperware is getting cheaper and cheaper."

    Seems like all guns are getting more expensive.

    BTW, I like my "quality" combat tupperware!!!

    :D
     
  19. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    Waaaaayyyy back when LED watches first came out, my brother bought one of the first. For $500. It didn't have a calculator, or GPS system, or even an address book...it was just a watch. Black plastic with red LED's.

    About that same time I bought a slightly-used S&W 586 for around $225.

    Care to guess which is worth more now?
     
  20. hansolo

    hansolo Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    745
    Location:
    So. Cal. Desert
    The "Good Old Days"

    Ahhh, the WayBack machine!

    I just transported back to 1973...I am 25 years of age. The first digital alarm clocks are not LED, but, rather, the numbers are halved horizontilly, and the top half flips over the bottom...my brand new Harley Davidson Electraglide is about $2,800.00 OTD,
    My Dad bought a Cougar XR7 a few years ago with a 390 V8 for about $4,500.00.
    I buy a used, engraved Ruger Bearcat for about $40.00.

    I wanna go back to this time...oh, I forgot, I earn $5.00/Hr.
    :uhoh:

    Nevermind!:D
     
  21. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    hanslo

    whippersnapper!
    I am personal friends with the new principal of my HS I graduated from in '73. She invited me to take a tour, a VIP type deal. (yeah me a VIP guffaw)
    Got a feeling the 2 bit coke machine ain't there, and gas was IIRC 28 cents a gal. AAMCO Gold 105 octane...

    Still should have bought more guns than blowing $ on stuff that didn't appreciate...what little I had. Did buy myself Colt Combat Commander as a grad gift, don't remember what I paid...Worth what today...$600 or so
     
  22. WESHOOT2

    WESHOOT2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    854
    Location:
    Vermont
    IN THE LONG TERM..................

    It IS, after all, only money.

    And you get to buy guns with it.
    What could be better?
     
  23. Peter M. Eick

    Peter M. Eick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I don't think things have changed all that much. It depends upon what you are buying.

    Now on to guns and a comparison. When I bought my first centerfire handgun, a colt diamondback about 25 years ago it was $285 used. I recently bought a used k-22 5 screw and it was only $385. Ok, $100 difference in 25 years. Not bad. My first Python back in 78 was $350 (lightly used), my used one I bought last year was $650. That is less then double the costs. I think in terms of inflation that is probably a steal.

    Look at my 44 Automag. When I bought it new in the box, unfired but previously owned it was $2000 in 85. The ones on the market today in the same condition are about the same costs, maybe $2250 or so. The price has not changed that much.

    Now, I agree the 1911 costs have gone up a lot, but I think that is solely due to the demand right now for 1911's.
     
  24. MrPink

    MrPink Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    hither and yon
    I was just at a gun show last weekend. A dealer had NIB H&K P7M8s listed at $1,450. And he was selling them!
     
  25. incursion

    incursion Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    294
    P7s have gone up a lot since the 80s, but I've heard that it's because of the rise of German currency relative to the dollar.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page