blue_ridge
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2009
- Messages
- 222
A buddy of mine had his home broken into. A pistol was stolen and like any good citizen, he reported it stolen. A couple months later the pistol was recovered from a homicide and he was notified. The police are telling him because it was involved in a homicide the pistol will not be returned to him and more than likely it will be destroyed.
Is this legal? It seems wrong to me that they can disregard the fact that this pistol is his property and should be returned. I would understand if they required him to pick it up in person or pay to have it shipped to an FFL or some other procedure to keep things respectable. But to simply dismiss his ownership of the gun because of what happened to it after it left his possession does not seem right to me.
If a car is stolen and used in a hit and run, you get your car back AND you have to pay for any repairs etc. Why wouldn't it be the same with any other personal property?
Is this legal? It seems wrong to me that they can disregard the fact that this pistol is his property and should be returned. I would understand if they required him to pick it up in person or pay to have it shipped to an FFL or some other procedure to keep things respectable. But to simply dismiss his ownership of the gun because of what happened to it after it left his possession does not seem right to me.
If a car is stolen and used in a hit and run, you get your car back AND you have to pay for any repairs etc. Why wouldn't it be the same with any other personal property?