I was thinking about this. It's just a thought, not something I'm actually dealing with.
Person A wants to buy Person B a gun as a gift. Person A buys the gun and gives it to Person B.
If Person B is not a prohibited person, it's ok.
If Person B is a prohibited person, it's a straw purchase.
How does the law deal with cases where Person A has no reason to believe that Person B is a prohibited person?
Obviously, if done for the purposes of getting around the background check, there is malicious intent and it is a crime.
What if it is for example, a husband getting his wife a gift, and doesn't realize his wife had a felony conviction before he met her and never got clemency?
I'm just curious.
Person A wants to buy Person B a gun as a gift. Person A buys the gun and gives it to Person B.
If Person B is not a prohibited person, it's ok.
If Person B is a prohibited person, it's a straw purchase.
How does the law deal with cases where Person A has no reason to believe that Person B is a prohibited person?
Obviously, if done for the purposes of getting around the background check, there is malicious intent and it is a crime.
What if it is for example, a husband getting his wife a gift, and doesn't realize his wife had a felony conviction before he met her and never got clemency?
I'm just curious.