But you ain't cocking the striker with your trigger finger now are you.
rc
Right, so now you have an apples to apples comparison with a custom 1911.
But you ain't cocking the striker with your trigger finger now are you.
rc
He's blowing air. Not that there's anything wrong with that.But you ain't cocking the striker with your trigger finger now are you.
rc
Don't think so. Look at the original posit/question. There are more now than then. Unless you're talking horseapples, of course.Right, so now you have an apples to apples comparison with a custom 1911.
Don't think so. Look at the original posit/question. There are more now than then. Unless you're talking horseapples, of course.
If someone ever designs a striker fired gun with a trigger that rivals a 1911 or quality revolve,r I see no reason why striker fired would not have the potential to be just as accurate, maybe more. But so far no one has tried
If all you're looking at is the accuracy of the weapon, lock time is irrelevant. The Ransom Rest isn't going to move from the time the trigger breaks until the primer ignites. The only benefit of reduced lock time is the reduction in the amount of time the shooter can screw up the shot with poor technique.It appears that the striker system has a faster lock time which is a plus for absolute mechanical accuracy.
Which even though the question was posed from a purely mechanical point of view, is all this thread has revolved around....which in no way reflects practical accuracy.
If someone made a single action striker fired handgun it could have the lock time of a Glock/XD/etc... and still have the trigger of a 1911.