But if I had my pick to get me out of a really bad situation, I'd take my CZ 75B any day. Even over the Glocks. ( uh oh....I'm in trouble now! lol)
The CZ75 is not a "cheaper alternative" to the BHP, it is the next evolution of the BHP which was the next evolution of the 1911 ( *gasp* BLASPHEMY!!!! *gasp*). JMB May have had nothing to do with the CZ design (and had been long dead by then) but it takes many cues from the BHP and improves on them.I've bought 2 guns in my life (all other needs were gifted, or inherited). A CZ 550 Varmint for myself and a CZ 452 Ultra-Lux for my dad. My next purchase will be a CZ 452FS or a CZ 452 Lux for myself. Afte that a CZ 550 6.5x55...after that an FNP, but eventually I want a CZ 75B, like towboats' . My dad is a Hi-Power luster, but I think the CZ 75 might be the cheapest alternative we can get to a Hi-Power.
After alot of years, for me it's come down to all-metal... a bunch of SIGs, a bunch of CZs and a couple third-generation S&Ws.
Don't see any Glocks or their ilk infiltrating my inventory any time soon.
I felt the same way until I had a chance to shoot a Styer M9-A1. For a polymer frame striker fired pistol, it's just great. It has a much better trigger than anything else I've shot that's striker fired.
I recently traded a FNX9 for P01. On a whim, added a kadet .22 conversion unit. In both calibers, this gun is fantastic.
QUESTION: What' the difference between the "DECOCKER" models and those with the thumb safety?
Thanks,
Paul
One last question: Can the safety be engaged when the hammer is down in the DA mode?