SWAT Teams Gone wild, two wrongful raids inthree days!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
5,687
Location
Delaware home of tax free shopping
Bank robbery suspect freed after police admit wrong man arrested in raid
By TERRI SANGINITI, The News Journal

Posted Monday, September 25, 2006 at 9:31 pm
Bank robbery charges against a Lewes man, who was arrested last week, were dismissed after police determined he could not have committed the holdup they were investigating.

Dover police said that initially, eyewitness evidence pointed to Brock Charles as the man who walked into Wilmington Trust Bank on Walker Road on Sept. 19 and handed the teller a note demanding money. But Charles, it turned out, was at work at a Lewes construction site at the time the heist occurred in Dover.

Charles’ mother, Joanne Bateson, was still reeling Monday from her son’s Wednesday night arrest during a state police SWAT team raid. The raid left the home’s sliding glass door smashed and furnishings in disarray.

“First there was a loud pounding on the window, with lights flashing and screaming outside,” she said. “I thought someone was coming to kill us.”

Bateson said she and her son, his girlfriend and her fiance all scrambled into the hallway as the troopers let themselves in the front door.

“My son was screaming, ‘You have the wrong house, the wrong person,’” Bateson said.

He was already in custody by the time she learned he had been identified as a suspect in the Sept. 19 bank robbery.

Charles was charged with second-degree robbery and committed to the Delaware Correctional Center in lieu of $10,000 cash bail.

Thursday night, his mother posted his bail, and he was released.

Dover police dismissed the charges against Charles on Friday, after conferring with the state Attorney General’s Office, Capt. Lester Boney said.

Police are still searching for the correct bandit in the Dover case. Friday morning, a man wearing a white baseball cap similar to the one seen in Dover’s bank heist robbed the Citizens Bank in Bear. Authorities now believe the two robberies may be connected.

Boney said Monday Charles’ arrest was a rare instance of mistaken identity. “It’s not that we were doing anything intentional,” he said. “We were working on good faith. A person called and said the bank photo resembled Charles and we did a photo lineup for the bank tellers who positively identified him. Apparently, they look pretty much alike.”

State police spokesman Cpl. Jeff Oldham said SWAT team members were armed with an arrest warrant identifying Charles as a bank robber.

Charles had previously been arrested by state police in 2003 during a disturbance at Cape Henlopen High School football game.

He was later convicted of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest in the case. Several other charges against him were dismissed, his mother said.

“The warrant was for him,” Oldham said. “We did not get the wrong guy. We entered the house by our standard operating procedure taking into consideration the safety of the home’s occupants as well as the safety of the officers entering as our No. 1 priority.”

Oldham said troopers had a legal right to be there.

Who pays for the damage sustained remains a question under investigation, he said.

Bateson, meanwhile, said neither she nor her son received an apology for the obvious mistake.

“They have destroyed my life and put it on the news that my son is a bank robber,” she said. “My family has been tortured, and I can’t get a formal apology from them to say that they screwed up big-time.”

Contact Terri Sanginiti at 324-2771 or [email protected].

And another raid in which they arrested another innocent man with no prior record Happened two days ago:

Police, again, accuse the wrong man
Hunt continues for suspect in bank robberies
By TERRI SANGINITI, The News Journal

Posted Wednesday, September 27, 2006

SUSPECT: Surveillance photo of bank robber


WRONGLY ARRESTED: Brock Charles, charges dismissed


WRONGLY ARRESTED: William Pruitt, released early Tuesday
Thanks in part to his love of lollipops, a Bear man has been cleared of a bank robbery charge, while state police continue looking for the real culprit.

It was the second such arrest in a week in which police nabbed -- and released -- the wrong man in a hunt for a bank robber, who remains on the lam after allegedly committing two holdups and an attempted heist elsewhere in the state.

"They look very much alike," state police spokeswoman Sgt. Melissa Zebley said of the two cases of mistaken identity. "We got an anonymous call -- someone who said they knew him and said it was this individual.

"Detectives created a photo lineup for the victim," she added, "and the teller identified him in 32 seconds."

Late Monday, a state police SWAT team, detectives and a K-9 dog converged on the suspect's Bear home to arrest the 25-year-old identified as having robbed a bank Friday in Bear.

Authorities said the suspect was the same man who tried to rob a Talleyville bank Monday morning.

The bank robber police were looking for -- wearing an oversize white baseball cap and an equally oversize designer shirt with cufflinks -- was not the man they arrested.

Coupled with a similar arrest in Lewes a week ago, two families say they are now fraught with embarrassment by false accusations by police.

"It's taken my pride and dignity away," said Teri Pruitt, son William was arrested at her home Monday night. "It's not even embarrassment -- it's my pride that my son has to be labeled a bank robber."

Teri Pruitt said she took one good look at the surveillance picture claiming to be her son, and acknowledged that it resembled him. But her son is about 20 pounds lighter and has chin hairs and a light mustache, she said.

Pruitt, of the 600 block of Huckleberry Ave. in Bear, was charged Monday with second-degree robbery and wearing a disguise during a felony in connection with a holdup Friday morning at Citizens Bank inside the Acme store at 146 Fox Hunt Drive in Bear.

He was released early Tuesday in lieu of $10,000 bail.

Pruitt also was considered a suspect in Monday's noontime heist at PNC Bank at 4111 Concord Pike in Talleyville.

Then detectives checked his alibi.

Around the time the PNC Bank was robbed, Pruitt's mother said, her son was with with her at Wachovia Bank on Del. 896 in Newark.

Teri Pruitt said that while she cashed a check, her son was snagging two blue lollipops from customer service -- a practice that earned him the nickname "Lollipop Boy," because the act is so routine.

Their visit was captured on bank surveillance video and cleared her son of any wrongdoing in the Talleyville caper.

"I think they might think twice on the next one," Teri Pruitt said.

The husky bandit also has been linked to another bank robbery last Tuesday at Wilmington Trust on Walker Road in Dover.

In that case, state police SWAT team members, armed with a warrant from Dover police for the arrest of Brock Charles, burst into the alleged suspect's mother's Angola home Wednesday night.

Charles was arrested and charged with second-degree robbery.

But he, too, had an alibi: He was working his construction job in Lewes when the Dover heist occurred.

Charges against Charles were later dismissed.

Charles' mother, Joanne Bateson, said the trauma has kept her out of work in the days since.

"They have destroyed my life, and put it on the news that my son is a bank robber," Bateson said.

She added that her home was wrecked in the raid. "I'm just beside myself."

Here's how police say the mix-up happened:

In both cases, the perceived suspect was identified by the public after police released a bank surveillance photo.

After the two men were identified by anonymous tipsters, their mug shots were shown to the victimized bank tellers in a photo array.

Each time, the teller identified the wrong man as the bank robber.

"We rely on the media and we rely on the calls," Zebley said. "They're not taken carte blanche. They're substantiated on another level. It was based on the victim's identification as well.

"This is very unusual that we have this circumstance," she said.

Pruitt's mother said she expects an apology.

"I want people to know my son is not a bank robber," Pruitt said. "I live in a community where people want to be safe, and I try to uphold the law. Now my neighbors don't feel safe in the community.

"I don't trust the police now to call them when my life is in danger," she said. "I have a totally new outlook on this now."

Zebley said the search is still on for the elusive bandit in the oversize white baseball cap.
 
Now color me old fashioned, but in the old days two policemen might have gone to the suspects door, and knocked, brought him in and discovered that he had an alibi. Especially since neither of these men had a record of violence or crime, and the robber didnt even display a firearm. That was in the old protect and serve days, now we are in the new improved SWAT Paramilitary force days.

Imagine if this had been you or I and being law abiding we answered the door / assault armed.


A big part of the problem is the fact that these SWAT units exist.

You see they are very expensive to equip train and maintain.

So they, like a door to door vacumme cleaner salesman must make their NUT to justify their existance. There simply aren't enough extremely dangerous criminals to go around, and heck who wants to raid them anyway they might actually shoot back and ruin a perfectly good $2000 vest, not to mention the officer wearing it.

So in order to make their nut and keep their outrageous budget which could go to community policing which is way more effective at lowering the crime rate, and getting citizens to come forward and testify.....

They do SWAT raids for PR purposes and increase the count so they can argue how important they are at budget time.

Now the forgoing may not apply to LA where there are plenty of dangerous criminals, but it is certainly true in my home town and many other small towns and cities across America.
 
Especially since neither of these men had a record of violence or crime

Charles had previously been arrested by state police in 2003 during a disturbance at Cape Henlopen High School football game.
He was later convicted of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest in the case. Several other charges against him were dismissed, his mother said
 
I'm from Wilmington, and I sit here amazed by this article. All I can think to ask is...

There are SWAT teams in Delaware? I roll to disbelieve. :)

I guess there must be, but honestly, in all the years I lived there (maybe...24 of my 30 years) I do not recall a single mention of a SWAT raid anywhere in the state.
 
Cop bashers - unite to whine about how bad the cops are they made two more unnecessary SWAT raids, this time on innocent people.

Cop apologists - unite to tell us all how officer safety is the only thing that matters so any level of force is always justified.

I will say it again. The only place you are going to get satisfaction on getting rid of these egregious type of police activities is through the legislature and your other elected officials. They can actually do something about it. You want this problem fixed, get together with like minded people and put pressure to bear on your elected officials.
 
it would be nice when people post news clippings like this if they state where it happened. I had to read down several posts to learn it was in DE.
 
I will say it again. The only place you are going to get satisfaction on getting rid of these egregious type of police activities is through the legislature and your other elected officials.
No, the only way you are going to get satisfaction is to sue early and often.

They won't get the message until they have to hold a charity carwash in order to gas up the squad cars.
 
I thought it was in England until I had searched for a few minutes. I really wish you guys would put your locations in your profiles so we dont have to guess where your local newspaper is. And yes, the government already knows where you live. How do you think the packets that make up this web page get back to your computer instead of someone else's?
 
Is it legal to sue the police department in this sort of situation?

Furthermore, do they even have a legal obligation to pay for damages in a case like this?
 
Bad police work all around. They get an tip that this may be the guy and get the warrant based on that and a photo ID lineup? That's it? No other evidence, no time to build a case, just a tip and a photo ID?

Man, that's scary. Notice that the mistaken arrests happened to two different innocent victims. That shows how sloppy the police work was. Those arrests should never have been made.
 
The rush to use overwhelming military style force in a civilian situation tends to cause more damage then necessary, while I can understand the need for special units controlling them is the big issue and from what I see that does not happen in many cases.
 
"Detectives created a photo lineup for the victim," she added, "and the teller identified him in 32 seconds."

32 Seconds? That's an awful long time to stare at a few pictures. Sounds like a pretty weak ID. If the teller really recognized the guy it'd just be a few seconds. 32 seconds sounds like a lot of "maybe him ... but the chin more like him ... this guy's kinda close ... ok, I guess maybe its most like this one here ... this is the guy, probably maybe"

A pretty weak ID to use for justifying sending a SWAT team after someone.
 
Personally, I am completely against the current trend of Militarizating police forces. It was a bad idea from the start to allow SWAT teams to be created, and It is even more ricidiclous to have SWAT teams in small towns or cities where there is no need. If people can't see the harm this is doing to our rights, then we are doomed. If America people feel safe knowing highly trained commandos are at a ready call then I am afraid that it is too late and we already live in a police state.
 
The rush to use overwhelming military style force in a civilian situation tends to cause more damage then necessary, while I can understand the need for special units controlling them is the big issue and from what I see that does not happen in many cases.

SWAT units are used for the perceived high risk situations. The notion of blaming SWAT units for raids that turn out to be wrong because the background work behind the raid was wrong is simply ludicrous. If the SWAT officer serving the warrant is lysdexic and goes to the wrong house, blame the SWAT folks, but don't blame them for bad intel and being told to extract a person that maybe isn't guilty.

Now color me old fashioned, but in the old days two policemen might have gone to the suspects door, and knocked, brought him in and discovered that he had an alibi. Especially since neither of these men had a record of violence or crime, and the robber didnt even display a firearm. That was in the old protect and serve days, now we are in the new improved SWAT Paramilitary force days.

Maybe the old days you grew up in are different than mine, but in the old days, suspects didn't have a lot of rights and maybe the gentleman police had tea and crumpets with the suspect or maybe they expedited a confession prematurely. A lot of the nasty stuff blamed on SWAT teams is simply now much more visible because of the media and the fact that a TEAM of SWAT guys is a bit hard to miss. One or two rogue cops paying midnight visits and discovering an alibi could very easily refute the alibi on the spot with a heavy hand.

I like the naive aspect about how the one or two cops would have knocked on a door and just brought a suspect in for questioning is terrific. The problem with that is if the suspect did the crime, there is a good chance that 1) he won't answer the door, 2) he will take flight out the back, or 3) commence to fight. A SWAT team with a warrant can alleviate all three of those problems if they perform properly.
 
If I could invent a biometric scanner that fits on a rail I'd be rich! "Hey get Steve over here, he has the M16 with the fingerprint scanner, right? Uncuff him and scan his prints. Oh crap, wrong person again! Sorry sir. We'll mail you a check for a new front door."

When I am president of tacticool innovations you can say you knew me from THR.

Cop bashing is misused term. Yes I am a critic of SWAT teams. I have the highest respect for LEOs in general who do their jobs properly. Forcibly enter my house and wrongly arrest me and that respect is gone. I simply do not see the need for paramilitary tactics in law enforcement.
 
C'mon, it makes for good TV! It's also indoctrinating the next generations of Amexikans.

;)
 
I like the naive aspect about how the one or two cops would have knocked on a door and just brought a suspect in for questioning is terrific. The problem with that is if the suspect did the crime, there is a good chance that 1) he won't answer the door, 2) he will take flight out the back, or 3) commence to fight. A SWAT team with a warrant can alleviate all three of those problems if they perform properly.

The guy was a suspect. That means he was, that's right, suspected of committing a crime. Not proven to have.

There was also no prior history of violent attacks (the disorderly conduct is not a violent assault, prior to some people's belief), and the bank robber (who is still loose, by the way) used a slip of paper to rob the bank, not a rocket launcher.

How many people have to die in these botched raids before there is finally some repercussions for over-use of force? 20? 100? 1000?
 
This is getting to a critical point.
I dislike being around any swat team who is carrying out a mission.
A friend of mine owned seveal apartments.
The swat team came to one of them while he was inside painting.
Swat kicked the door open, came running in and tried to make my friend get on the floor. He would not get on the floor. They roughed him up pretty good.
They showed him the search warrant. He told them that they had the wrong house. They were 2 houses off. The suspects watched the attack, and then took off.
The officer in charge wanted to arrest my friend for disobeying a direct order and resisting arrest. (resisting arrest?)
My friend demanded to see a supervisor in charge. The supervisor showed up, and talked the other officer into not arresting my friend.
They would not pay for the damage, and they would not give an official "sorry" to my friend.
They just told him that he was lucky not to be in jail.
It is unbelivable that these types of things can and do happen.
 
The increasing use of SWAT teams and tactics is of concern to many. Was a weapon displayed during the robbery, was the note threatning to the tellers or anyone else? I'm not bashing here but it seems to me that the SWAT teams would/should be dispensed toward the openly dangerous, armed, BG's.
The local cops or detectives were'nt up to the task? Good thing niether of these guys reached for a cell phone or anything else or we might be reading a different story. I respect the LEO's and the jobs they do, but these days it's starting top give the impression that the Police aren't here to serve the community as much as they're here to control it with all the military style and the quickness to utilize it.
 
As long as Dept.'s have SWAT teams they'll use them at any chance they get. We don't want the guys to sit around twiddling their thumbs right? Gotta justify the expense and make some big cinematic tacticool raids. :uhoh:
 
I simply do not see the need for paramilitary tactics in law enforcement.

Larry Eugene Phillips Jr. and Emil Matasareanu.

It's sad that there are those people out there, but they are. And I'm surprised to hear so many are critical of SWAT teams here on THR. Aren't we always talking about how automatic weapons themselves are not bad, just the people who use them to commit crimes? Well if automatic weapons became legal tomorrow, you can bet there would be a lot of perfectly law-abiding people like us buying them. But there would also be a lot of criminals buying them. We just cannot allow criminals to outgun and overpower the good guys. Good guys=us, and the Police. The bad guys are always going to have weapons and will always be willing to kill. We can't treat them with kids gloves.

If those two detectives knocked on the door of one of today's drug lords, they would get killed on the spot.

The very real rise in the viciousness and tenacity of criminals has made SWAT teams necessary. It's sad, but real.
 
DRMMRO2 - I tend to agree but stories like these just tick me off. I know a few SWAT guys in my county and they come off as real hard-heads. Overzealous. Too militarized....almost scary. IMO it sends a bad message. We are here to control the people, not serve to people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top