Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

"tactical" M1A

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Foxtrot427, May 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Foxtrot427

    Foxtrot427 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    512
    I have been looking to get one of those M1a collapsing stock "EBR" style rifles. What are some of the cheaper M1s around? I have no objection to buying used as long as it is in good condition. So who all makes those style stocks? I know Sage and troy. Are sages drop in? Im on a budget for gun purchases btw.

    Im looking to do something that looks like this.
    [​IMG]
     
  2. arizcowboy

    arizcowboy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Southwest USA
    Research the price of those tactical M1A stocks before you buy a cheaper M1A copy to put in it. You could almost pay as much for the stock as the rifle itself. That soldier is holding almost $2000 worth of rifle and stock if purchased commercially.
     
  3. Correia

    Correia Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,648
    Location:
    SLC
    That is a Sage EBR stock. Heavy, and expensive, but very well made.

    Vltor also has a stock. Not as fancy, but lighter, and not as expensive.

    There are no cheap M14 type rifles out there anymore, unless you happen to come across a good deal on a used one. I've been looking for a project gun for awhile.
     
  4. N3rday

    N3rday Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2003
    Messages:
    778
    Doesn't Norinco make an M14 knockoff?

    here ya go:

    http://www.marstar.ca/gf-norinco/M-14S.shtm

    Now, I know thats a Canadian website, so you can't exactly order it from there (at least, I don't think you can), but it at least shows you they are out there.
     
  5. Correia

    Correia Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,648
    Location:
    SLC
    Not in the states. The Norcs can't be imported anymore.
     
  6. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,966
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Correia's spot on. Norinco M14S rifles can't be brought into the U.S..

    I can only assume you're not familiar with M14 derivative rifles since you're asking about price.

    You're looking at anywhere from a low (if you're very lucky) of $700 for a used Polytech or Norinco, don't buy the Norinco if you can get a Polytech, to upwards of $1,200+ for Springfield or some of the other U.S. manufactured complete guns. You might get out with the same price of a Springfield if you buy a reciever and have the gun built from parts.

    If you get a used Polytech you'll want a GI bolt and bolt carrier to put in. If you're lucky ,again, you'll spend $125 for that. Now with a nice used Polytech that isn't shot out with a GI bolt you'll have $825 in to it.

    Now for the Buck Rogers hardware. Figure on another $500-$800 for the swoopy stock. Add a couple more hunderd for the rail forend and your pushing $1500 - $2,200 to get gun in the picture.

    Of course you could just buy it for $2800 from Fulton Armory.
     
  7. Foxtrot427

    Foxtrot427 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    512
    wow I didnt know these damn things were so expensive. I love the look but as of now and for a long time, I wont be able to afford that. Hopefully there isnt an AWB when I can afford it in a few years.
     
  8. trbon8r

    trbon8r Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2005
    Messages:
    863
    Location:
    MD
    I would advise buying a bone stock M14 type rifle and shooting it before buying any fancy aftermarket parts.

    I've been shooting these rifles a long time and have found that a bone stock rifle with GI fiberglass stock will do just fine. Recently I tried experimenting with some new "gee whiz" stuff like an Aimpoint mounted on a Knight's RAS. I didn't like it, and found that I could shoot more accurately with the iron sights. I've since sold the RAS and I'm going back to a traditional handguard and iron sights. I can't think of any other rifle where the KISS principle applies more than the M14.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    I agree to keep things simple starting out with the m1a/m14. There are a lot of things one can do, and with this system people try to wedge it into roles it might not be best for.

    Speaking of stocks, for the record here is another good one:

    http://www.jae100.com/
     
  10. AndyC

    AndyC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,581
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    That JAE is one sweet looking rifle:

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Foxtrot427

    Foxtrot427 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    512
    I would probably buy a stock one first. And the stock, I would want to be able to come on and off when I want. I like the gun in both forms.
     
  12. FXR

    FXR Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Another vote for the synthetic stock for the M1A

    I have a Fulton version of the M1A with the wood stock which I like tremendously. You can buy several (slightly) used synthetic stocks, paint them different camo colors to suit your mood, and do little else and still have a great rifle. I may even paint one hot pink or lavender just to keep up with those stylin' AR's I see at the range...:cool:

    The Sage stock looks good but not on my budget; the wood stock does just fine for my needs. I suspect that the adjustable feature of the Sage is very compatible with the body armor our guys wear in Iraq so the the stock has a place for them.

    K
     
  13. Dienekes

    Dienekes Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,905
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Concur with the KISS principle. Irons are fast, reliable, and accurate at short to medium ranges and obviously the weight is negligible. I am not an eagle-eyed kid anymore but as long as I can make do with my Mk.1 eyeballs things work out pretty well. I have a Smith Ent. side mount and am trying to get up to speed on practical optics just in case I really have to upgrade someday. So far I have been able to defer that. So far so good.

    If there is a problem with irons it is in target identification and definition at 150 yards plus. Sort of a nonissue. Most combat is a lot closer than that, so I question the need to hang a bunch of stuff on an otherwise decent handling rifle.

    Better to spend the bucks on training and ammo.
     
  14. stealthmode

    stealthmode Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    459
    That JAE is nice
     
  15. scbair

    scbair Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2003
    Messages:
    611
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Considering its genesis and capabilities, since when is a stock M1A NOT "tactical"??? :scrutiny:
     
  16. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,051
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    Tac stocks add up to 2.5 pounds of weight (or more) to what is already a heavy rifle.
     
  17. 3 gun

    3 gun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    N 041 24.000 W 081 43.000 N.E.Ohio
    I broke down and picked up a Sage stock. Best money I've spent. It makes shooting major in USPSA possible. You can watch your hits thru the scope, it cuts recoil that much.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,966
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Turning a fine battle rifle into a Christmas tree is bad, but if the Sage cuts fealt recoil then it's a good thing.
     
  19. Mannlicher

    Mannlicher Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,430
    Location:
    North Central Florida and Miami Florida
    so far, I am quite happy with the stocks that came on my SOCOM and my M1A Loaded, from Springfield. I use the irons on the M1A, and have a EOTech 511 on the SOCOM.
     
  20. 3 gun

    3 gun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    N 041 24.000 W 081 43.000 N.E.Ohio
    Another big plus with the Sage is how well the receiver fits into the stock. Just the stripped action fits so well that you need to use something to "punch" it out. You can't just pull it out or flip it over and wiggle. And that's BEFORE you add the beefed up barrel band. It is a match rifle kind of fit. Group sizes have been reduced enough that you can tell before and after groups with the naked eye. Other than the receiver and barrel band, nothing touches the stock. With the open design the gun stays cooler while firing and cools faster after the stage. Add in the solid, trouble free rail to mount a red dot and you have a HUGE step up from the standard rifle and scope mount. I'll say this, it works better than it looks like it should. I'd buy another in a heatbeat.
     
  21. Sry0fcr

    Sry0fcr Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    Houston, Republic of Texas
    I like Troy's CBR stock.

    Link

    I wonder how much it weighs?
     
  22. Gewehr98

    Gewehr98 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,988
    Would somebody please tell me...

    Where exactly is the bolt carrier is on my M14NM? I've been looking all over hell and high water looking for a bolt carrier on my gun. I've got a bolt, and an oprod...

    Most of the Norinco/Polytech M14SA guns with the dreaded soft bolts had both their bolts and barrels replaced, since a USGI bolt seldom headspaced properly with the original Chinese barrels.

    So one can't make major power factor in USPSA with a standard USGI stock? :confused:

    Good call. Christmas trees notwithstanding, the definition of "tactical" has become a long and slippery slope. I fear my own M14NM is no longer tactical, since it's neither SAGE-stocked, nor does it use batteries in the optics. Real POS, it's really only good for hitting man-sized targets out to 800+ yards. Poor pitiful me, guess I should sell it, 'cuz it just ain't the shiznat...

    [​IMG]
     
  23. 3 gun

    3 gun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    N 041 24.000 W 081 43.000 N.E.Ohio
    True the power factor doesn't change with the stock, the ease of use does. The increase in accuracy, reduced recoil, better fit and ease of mounting optics all make the Sage stock superior to the standard stock it replaced, at least where I shoot. Same reason I took the time to make 30rd mags work in my rifle. It levels the field between the ARs and my M1a. YMMV
     
  24. Spark

    Spark Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    312
    I thought there were problems with the SAGE stock not being secure enough to retain zero when optics are mounted on it?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page