Taurus PT92 "golden age" evolution

AlexanderA

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
10,592
Location
Virginia
The 1990's are considered to be the "golden age" for the Taurus PT92 (Beretta offshoot). This was after the adoption of the ambidextrous safety and the relocated magazine release (good), and before the addition of the accessory rail and the Taurus Security System internal lock (bad).

But there was constant evolution within the 1990's. Here are some of the highlights.

Pre-1989 production. This has highly polished surfaces on the front and rear of the frame, as well as the sides of the slide. The rear sight does not have white dots. Most of these came with wooden grips. Pictured are aftermarket Uncle Mike's rubber grips. The magazine floorplate has been replaced with an unmarked Beretta floorplate. (The Taurus floorplate is just folded sheet metal.)

IMG_1192a.jpg

December 1989 production. All surfaces of the frame are now dull, although the sides of the slide remain highly polished. 3-dot sights. Again, aftermarket Uncle Mike's grips and Beretta flooplate.

IMG_1193a.jpg

April 1994 production. Decocker version. (Model designation PT92 AF-D.) Sides of the slide remain polished. These grips are all polymer, although earlier decocker grips were polymer over a metal core. The metal-core grips can be identified by the word "Brasil" in the Taurus logo. Slide markings are laser-engraved rather than roll-marked.

IMG_1194a.jpg

September 1998 production. Decocker. The finish is now dull throughout. Wider slide serrations, as well as wider, simpler 3-dot sights. Polymer guide rod (replaced with metal). As produced, these guns don't have lanyard rings. Replaced the Taurus hammer-spring plug with a Beretta plug that includes the lanyard ring. (Note: the Beretta lanyard ring is rotated 90 degrees from the Taurus ring. This change is necessary because the new Taurus frame is not beveled at that spot.)

In this late production,Taurus eliminated 3 of the grip screw bushings, by combining them with the grip screws. I changed those to Hogue low-profile bushings plus separate Beretta grip screws. (If this conversion is done, you must put internal-tooth lock washers (in a standard size, which fits perfectly) underneath the grip screws, or else they will protrude into the magazine well.)

These guns were normally supplied with 17-round magazines instead of 15-round. Taurus 17-round magazines can be identified by their yellow followers. As before, Beretta floorplates can be substituted.

IMG_1195a.jpg
 
Last edited:
What was the point of the grip bushing change?
Obviously to save a few pennies in production costs. But they could only do that for 3 out of the 4 bushings. The 4th bushing (the upper one on the left side) has a special flange that retains the safety return spring.

BTW, that safety return spring really isn't necessary. The safety works the same whether that spring is present, or is missing. And these springs are unavailable, or are very expensive, as parts. (A reasonable copy of the spring can be made by bending .035" stainless steel wire, found in hobby shops.) In my pictures, you can see the end of the spring, in the gap just below the safety lever.
 
Pictured are aftermarket Uncle Mike's rubber grips.
Probably one of the best products Uncle Mike's ever made. They were excellent grip panels.

Late '91 or early '92, first run of the de-cockers, the PT-92 AFS-D labeled models. Well over 10K rounds through it (my entire family has had this pistol at times, so maybe several thousand rounds over that). More than acceptable accuracy. Zero malfunctions. Ever. Replaced recoil spring exactly once. This pistol (and an early Model 85 snubby) have endeared Taurus products to me for the past 30 years. And I am a gun snob.
PT92.JPG
 
I had the PT-99AF in stainless. (99=adjustable rear sight) Phenomenal gun. (And I'm generally a Taurus hater.) I seriously regret selling it. I've since replaced it with a genuine Beretta M9, and I really dislike that slide mounted safety. (Other than that, the Beretta, too, is a phenomenal gun. I'm rather miffed the military replaced it.)
 
(Other than that, the Beretta, too, is a phenomenal gun. I'm rather miffed the military replaced it.)
Yeah, I always felt like the oddball too, since I really liked the M9 my last 15 years on active duty. Apparently, I am one of the 5% of the population for whom the Beretta's (and the Taurus') grips fit perfectly and the pistols point well...
 
Yeah, I always felt like the oddball too, since I really liked the M9 my last 15 years on active duty. Apparently, I am one of the 5% of the population for whom the Beretta's (and the Taurus') grips fit perfectly and the pistols point well...
You and me both, I guess. If it were that big of a problem, why did it take from 1985 to 2017 to figure it out? I think the hand size/grip size thing was a bit of a red herring.
 
EgNxDMX.jpeg


FigLL45.jpeg


My blued August 1994 production PT92AF-D and satin nickel April 1991 production PT92AF-D. The nickel one does not have the decocker return spring installed nor can it take it. There is no cutout in the frame for it. My Tauruses are just as good as my Berettas.

I agree that the late 80s to early 90s was the golden age for the Taurus PT92 series. These are truly fantastic guns.
 
I owned a stainless one for some time. Never a hiccup but a grip slightly too fat for my medium USA size chart hands which always bothered me a little and I finally traded it off.
 
Yeah, I always felt like the oddball too, since I really liked the M9 my last 15 years on active duty. Apparently, I am one of the 5% of the population for whom the Beretta's (and the Taurus') grips fit perfectly and the pistols point well...
I've never had an issue with the grip profile of the Beretta nor the Taurus.
 
I have a 92AF manufactured in 1985. Perfect mint condition. Bought it off the auctions 2 years ago. Original box and all. Gave $400 for it.
 
First handgun I bought (1993) Ditched the stock wood grips and installed the Uncle Mikes (very comfortable) Still one of the most accurate 9 mm handguns I own (next to my CZ)
Needed new grip panel bushings for it at one time, couldn't get in contact with Taurus so I installed the Beretta ones and used a thin perfectly fitting stainless steel washer to take care of the safety spring retention.
 
First handgun I bought (1993) Ditched the stock wood grips and installed the Uncle Mikes (very comfortable)
The Uncle Mike's grips are a quality product, but they're a bit thicker than the OEM plastic grips. That could make a difference for those with smaller hands.
Needed new grip panel bushings for it at one time, couldn't get in contact with Taurus so I installed the Beretta ones and used a thin perfectly fitting stainless steel washer to take care of the safety spring retention.
A little secret is that the safety return spring (the one that's retained by the top left grip screw bushing) isn't really necessary. My 1998-vintage PT92 did not have one, and the safety worked perfectly. (It's known that Taurus omitted these from some pistols, from the factory.) Well, perfectionist that I am, I scoured ebay until I found one (it was expensive, because I had to buy a package with some other parts as well). Anyway, I installed it, and it made no difference, before and after.

Other than that one bushing with the flange, Beretta grip screws and grip screw bushings are totally interchangeable with the Taurus. Hogue low-profile bushings will also work. However, if you use these (to tighten the fit of the grips against the frame), you must put a toothed lock washer under the grip screw head. Otherwise, the grip screw will protrude into the magazine well.
 
Early 80s production PT-92. Right after Taurus purchased the factory from Beretta.
European-style magazine heel release. Even the current Taurus 17-round magazines have the notch for the heel release.
I was late to the game. I wanted new, so I got stuck with a Picatinny rail on the bottom. Not a fan of that feature.
Even worse than the rail is the Taurus Security System keyed lock. Easily defeated (with a paper clip, if you know what you're doing), but not easily removed. And when you do remove it, it leaves a big hole in the back of the grip.

You can still find the 1990's PT92's on Gun Broker, and they're not much more expensive, in execllent condition, than the current ones.
 
Last edited:
European-style magazine heel release. Even the current Taurus 17-round magazines have the notch for the heel release.

Even worse than the rail is the Taurus Security System keyed lock. Easily defeated (with a paper clip, if you know what you're doing), but not easily removed. And when you do remove it, it leaves a big hole in the back of the grip.

You can still find the 1990's PT92's on Gun Broker, and they're not much more expensive, in execllent condition. than the current ones.
Yup.... my Taurus 17rders do work in it. 😄

The lock is garbage, added around 2000ish to the PT92. The rail came about in 2005ish. I won't buy a post 1997 Taurus PT92 for a reason.
 
The lock is garbage, added around 2000ish to the PT92. The rail came about in 2005ish. I won't buy a post 1997 Taurus PT92 for a reason.
I forgot to mention that the Taurus keys (for the security lock) are all the same! So if you have a Taurus key, you can use it to unlock any Taurus gun. Besides that, the "key" is just a hex wrench with a little hole in it. You can get such a thing with any set of enhanced hex wrenches. And further, you don't even need a hex wrench -- you can open the lock by jamming a paper clip in there. What a joke.
 
I forgot to mention that the Taurus keys (for the security lock) are all the same! So if you have a Taurus key, you can use it to unlock any Taurus gun. Besides that, the "key" is just a hex wrench with a little hole in it. You can get such a thing with any set of enhanced hex wrenches. And further, you don't even need a hex wrench -- you can open the lock by jamming a paper clip in there. What a joke.
The S&W locks key is similar. It is just a modified S&W banded handcuff key and it is universal for all S&W made guns.
 
Interesting how these old Taurus guns are being commented on. When I decided to buy a 9 MM a work Friend who was an FFL holder suggested a PT 92. It was $200.00 and changes as I recall. Was Impressed! Just a reliable accurate 15 shot pistol that I liked so much I bought a PT99. I still have both, from 1986, and I've never had a complaint. B Taurus.jpg
 
Back
Top