jmorris
Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2005
- Messages
- 24,275
I believe that the primary driver to their demise was the fact that their CHRONY technology was unchangingly 1980s State of the Art.
Last weekend I had a fairly lengthy discussion with a friend of mine pertaining to firearms advancement over the last 100+ years.
It’s a different argument than say advancement in airplanes where in 1903 they held one person (laying on the wing) and could stay airborn for about the length of the wing span on a 747.
Or in automobiles where the first Ford that had 1668 cc engine developing 8 hp and could almost reach 30 MPH after you hand cranked on it enough to get it running.
If you wait a couple days we will have threads on if the 30-06 or 45 ACP are “dead” and enough supporters to know they remain viable options to this day.
The only chronograph that uses “state of the art” in the collection of data is the Labradar, that uses Doppler, it was “state of the art” in the 1940’s. The others are still just a timer circuit and a start/stop switch a known distance apart. Then again, that’s all it takes to do the job.
The last “game changer” for firearms I can remember being promoted was when Hornady found out their plastic tips were melting and they changed the plastic they used…
Last edited: