The Lee Harvey Oswald Shot(s)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Supposedly Hathcock said it was a difficult shot, and he knew a little about shooting...

The internet said so...

themanfrom2063.com/lee-harvey-oswalds-markmanship/

Thats not my favorite site or anything, just showed up in a google search FYI
 
There is an episode of "Unsolved History" that investigated the Kennedy shooting. They should that Oswald could have easily made the three shots and even managed to recreate the "magic bullet" shot that passed through Kennedy and Connely.

A 60-90 yard shot from a rest is not difficult. Even if Oswald was not a stellar rifleman, he was trained in the craft.

I question the motives and outcomes of the early investigations but that is a topic for another forum.
 
the actual gun he used was tested by the FBI and they remarked how sticky the bolt was. Not that that necessarily proves anything.

Oswald was no stranger to that rifle and that is what counts. I have a few rifles that nobody else can shoot as quickly as I can and it isn't because I am a superior marksman by any stretch of the imagination, it's because I am comfortable with them. If I remember correctly, he frequented rifle ranges and he even tried to assassinate a conservative General named General Walker 2 days before the Kennedy shooting.
 
We are only talking about the first shot. Not the string of fire. His first shot is the one that supposedly hit JFK, so any follow ups are not relevant to this.

Really ?

ORIGINAL POSTER......The time it would've taken to fire these shots is supposedly 3 shots in 8 seconds using a Carcano 6.5x52mm bolt action rifle.
 
Good point about being familiar with your weapon Ranger. Another article talked about the scope being "off" by a little. But someone could overcome that if they shoot it that way every time out I'd imagine. It could've also come off zero in the after shot whirlwind I suppose.
 
With the car moving away at a slight angle after making the turn but before reaching the underpass, the shots would have been reasonably easy from the depository window. They were all well within range for any rifle, and would not have required any elevation adjustments or more than minor windage adjustments.

In contrast, shooting from the knoll, sewer grate or other alternate sites would be far more difficult. From there the car would move across the shooter's field of vision, requiring dramatic windage adjustment and the ability to fire a rifle like a shotgun or time a single shot precisely. I think folks tend to overestimate the challenge posed by distance and underestimate the challenged posed by a target moving laterally across your field of fire.

There are some conspiracy theories associated with this killing that could be made into outstanding movies. Espionage, cover-ups, a secret assassin, and plots withing plots. But this isn't one of them. The alternate shooter locations are the *least* interesting and among the most absurd of the conspiracy theories. Even if LHO was eating his lunch at the time, the shooter still would have been in that position or one very similar. It's a very good spot.
 
Last edited:
read 'Case Closed'

The first shot missed (the limo was traversing in the field of fire) ad thought to have hit the curb across the street.

The second and third shots occurred with the limo more or less traveling closer to directly away.

Easy shots since there is little movement of the point of aim in the field of view.

Bolt action rifles can be fires surprisingly fast if you can work the action quickly leaving more time to adjust aim.
 
About fifteen years ago, I was at the window where the shot was taken. As I remember, the distance down to the street was literally a chip shot. Seemed like a lot less than 90 or even 60 yards. I remember thinking how easily I could have made the shot.

It's just a 5th story window directly overlooking the street.
 
Its not difficult to make those shots at that range at all. And given the range there is plenty of room for error to. if you can't hit a target like that at that distance with a scoped rifle of any kind then there is one of two things going on. Either there is something really wrong with that rifle and scope or you can't shoot worth a dang and should not be behind a rifle. I mean no offense to anyone but its not that difficult of a shot. If you want some real good info on it there are a lot of documentaries on Netflix that do a dang good job of explaining the events, uncovering the conspiracy and all of that good stuff. But, the shot itself would be a piece of cake.
 
I understand Oswald was left handed.

If he shot left handed and bolted with his right hand I would expect him to use a rest to hold the front of the rifle as he bolted with his right hand.

If so, was there any scratches on the gun that matched the window or anything else to show he used that method (or was he known to shoot right handed even though he was left handed himself?)

Deaf
 
There were numerous first hand and press accounts of the rifle as a "7.65 Mauser" based per Deputy Craig on what he *read on the barrel* (ie an importer's stamp). But then all reports switched to the M-C we know and love. It's probably because the M-C looks so much like an early '91 Argie Mauser carbine. But it's also a wonderful little bit of oddness.
 
Last edited:
Getting the shots off, even with a sticky bolt is very doable.

If I remember right he fired 3 times hitting twice. In my opinion he probably took his time on the first shot and then whacked off the next two as soon as he could get a close enough sight picture. I'd say it was just a good deal of luck involved in the shooting.
 
I understand Oswald was left handed.

If he shot left handed and bolted with his right hand I would expect him to use a rest to hold the front of the rifle as he bolted with his right hand.

If so, was there any scratches on the gun that matched the window or anything else to show he used that method (or was he known to shoot right handed even though he was left handed himself?)

Deaf

Maybe he learned to shoot right handed?? If the Marines were anything like the school system back then, they may have forced left handed people to do things right-handed.
I am right handed. Due to a shoulder injury, I taught myself to shoot a bow left handed. Now I can't imagine doing it any other way, and actually prefer. To do it left handed. I still shoot firearms right handed though......

Just throwing that out there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top