"My problem with the Rhino is not it's looks. My problem is the $800 price tag that comes with a Rhino. If I need to resell a Rhino I will never find a buyer until I drop the price to $200 for the thing. Money is to hard to come by to just throw it away."
Wait, the guns are selling at such a high price you'd have to sell them for 200$ in order to sell yours, which you would have already bought at 800$ yourself. Non sequitor. Further, 200$ won't even buy a functional 22LR single action, so why the hell would you expect a brand new 357 DA/SA with aluminum frame to fetch such a low price? Because
you don't like it? Well, then don't buy one
The price tag is high, but so are all other aluminum frame revolvers, it seems. The
actual issues with the guns are;
-It was designed by Emilio Ghisoni (pro for coolness, but a major con for practicality --none of his designs were more marketable than the Rhino)
-It has aesthetics that are incredibly jarring to the revolver crowd (now that it's been out and 'shocking' people for years to make a name for itself, it'd be nice if they would offer a 2" snub version with all the sharp edges rounded off)
-The grip layout is fairly jarring to the revolver crowd (it's more like a highly-raked semi-auto grip)
-It's being marketed by MKS Distributing, of Hi Point infamy, and who can't seem able to get these iconic guns in TV or movies with any regularity, let alone running the competition circuits as sponsors in any capacity
-The guns were introduced about the same time manufacturing was brought stateside, so a combination of up-scaling and rough start caused a lot of QC issues (also because Chiappa hasn't been known to emphasize this as much as some others). It does seem like every time I mess with one in a store, the overall quality of the guns has increased a bit, though. They seem like a more delicate Ruger as far as quality, these days (so very close to non PC S&W's anymore), but with a better DA trigger (way worse SA cocking feel, since that design misstep has never been remedied)
TCB