The plot to renew AWB, part 2: the media (USA Today article)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ClonaKilty

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
272
Location
Pacific NW
Front page of today's USA Today. Ostensibly an article on how PDs across the US are arming themselves with rifles (as they have been since the North Hollywood fiasco), the article is laced with anti-black rifle sentiments. It even quotes a police chief as saying he has "absolute knowledge" that there are more evil rifles on the street since AWB's sunset.

I don't know how, but we need to nip this misinformation campaign in the bud.

********
Police Needing Heavier Weapons

By Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Law enforcement agencies across the country have been upgrading their firepower to deal with what they say is the increasing presence of high-powered weapons on the streets.

Scott Knight, chairman of the Firearms Committee of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, says an informal survey of about 20 departments revealed that since 2004 all of the agencies have either added weapons to officers' patrol units or have replaced existing weaponry with military-style arms.

Knight, police chief in Chaska, Minn., says the upgrades have occurred since a national ban on certain assault weapons expired in September 2004. The ban, passed in 1994, in part prohibited domestic gunmakers from producing semi-automatic weapons and ammunition dispensers holding more than 10 rounds.

"This (weapons upgrade) is being done with an eye to the absolute knowledge that more higher-caliber weapons are on the street since the expiration of the ban," Knight said. He said his own department of about 20 officers is in the midst of determining whether to upgrade its weapons.

Ron Stucker, criminal investigations chief of the Orange County Sheriff's Department in Florida, says the department has been rearming many of its deputies with assault weapons in the past two years.

Stucker says deputies are now "frequently" encountering assault weapons in local robberies and during simple traffic stops. Weapons seizures in Orlando have increased overall by 26% since 2004.

It was not immediately clear if assault weapons were driving the increase in weapons seizures or were directly linked to the county's record number of homicides in 2006, Stucker says.

In Houston, where homicides were up as much as 25% in 2006 over the previous year, Police Chief Harold Hurtt says the AK-47 assault rifle has become "kind of a weapon of choice" for warring gangs, major drug distributors and immigrant smugglers in a city that has become a major transit point for criminals.

"The reality on the street is that many of these weapons are readily available," says Hurtt, whose department began upgrading its weaponry with assault-style arms about three years ago before he arrived from Phoenix.

Last year, because of the escalation of violence and firepower on the street, Hurtt says he ordered patrol officers to wear body armor. Wearing armor had long been a matter of personal choice for officers.

The chief also is considering a proposal from officers to put 12-gauge shotguns back inside their patrol cars so they can be more accessible.

He said shotguns were moved to the car trunks when the cabs became crowded with laptop computers and other equipment.

Paul Erhardt, a spokesman for major gun manufacturer Sigarms, says the 2001 terrorist attacks, the violence following Hurricane Katrina and other high-profile incidents involving weapons contributed more to law enforcement's interest in rearming officers than any concerns raised by the expiring assault weapons ban. Erhardt's company outfits about 40% of the statewide law enforcement agencies in the USA.
 
Of course these weapons are readily avaliable - as they should be. Just whose logic was it that determined the standing army and the police should be better armed then the people they work for - the very ones they are hired to serve and protect?

Why shouldn't we have access to the same arms they are getting? Because less then .0001% of the population may use one to commit a homicide? I don't buy it - my liberties are too important.
 
I hope he doesn't actually think regular police kevlar is going to stop an AK47.



It honestly just sounds like they're using the AWB sunset and the recent terrorism/natural disasters to justify more funding for his deparment. He couldn't really care less if what he's saying is the truth or not.
 
What a load of "Bovine Scat".

The main reason why many departments are upgrading their weaponry with more rifles is due to the fact that most of them are flush with "Homeland Defense" bucks following 9/11. It is almost obscene to see the way that PDs and local government "Emergency Operations Centers" throughout the nation are sucking the federal teat and spending worse than drunken sailors. (At least the sailors are spending their own paychecks).
 
That jackass in Orlando was the same guy responsible for arresting a high school student for possession of a plastic butter knife. The D.A. then persued felony charges against the kid for violating weapons-free school zone laws. When the state legislature had an emergency session to ammend the law to exclude table knives and small pocket knives, this clown of a police chief expressed his opposition and outrage in the press.
 
So, there are more EBRs on the street since the AWB faded into memory, BIG F'ING DEAL!!!

EBRs do not kill people, Evil People kill people. Neither of my EBRs or my AK have jumped out of the safe and started shooting people. Criminals, on the other hand, have walked into buildings, malls, and schools and killed people.

Maybe we should have a law that says it is illegal to kill people. Oh, wait..... :banghead:
 
It is a fallacy that any more rifles are on the streets anyway. The same rifles were available during the ban, they just couldn't have a threaded barrel or a collapsible stock. If they were available all along, then how could they suddenly be more available now?
 
yup...

...just stirrin' the pot;)
USA has also been suggesting that Iran isn't really involved with supplying weapons in Iraq...
They're trying to rally the "troops" to assault our tools...one way and then another...Sounds more like the UN than anything USA...
 
How do these police chiefs continue to show such a lack of understanding of the basic concepts of firearms and what the "so-called ban" actually accomplished?!? Are they truely stupid and ignorant on the issue or are they consious deceivers?
 
houston humor

In this article they also mention the jump in crime in Houston, yet fail to take into account all the trash that washed into town after Katrina washed it out of N.O. The entire population of Houston jumped as well as crimes. I was reading a thing a while back in American Handgunner about the jump in crime and how a large percentage of all crime in Houston have "victims" of Katrina now residing there.
 
That was a terrible article. Both the writer and one of the primary sources display a total lack of fundamental knowledge of the subject. It is full of half-truths and anecdotes, with no hard data or facts. Yet it is on the front page of USA Today today, like it is the total truth, rather than the useless garbage it is. People who have no knowledge of the subject, however, like the average American, will take this as some sort of truth and of course believe that we certainly need another "assault weapon ban".

Journalism is dead. It's all hype and business now.
 
Actually, the upgrades to law enforcement weapons started after the North Hollywood bank robbery in 1997, well *before* the "assault weapon" ban expired. Upgrades were considered necessary not because the bank robbers used full auto AK's, but because they were wearing body armor that rendered typical police issue weapons, handguns and shotguns, ineffective.

Has anyone talked about a body armor ban? Oh, wait, it's already illegal for felons to possess body armor in many states. Sorry, didn't mean to muddie the water with facts. :barf: :barf: :barf:
 
In Houston, where homicides were up as much as 25% in 2006 over the previous year

NSS! Really? I wonder what happened in Houston in 2006? :banghead:
This guy is just tring to justify doubling his budget by scaring the public.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top