The Port Arthur Massacre in Australia

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm going to advise you now Cortez, you and all Australian gun owners, get your hands on Enemies, Foreign, and Domestic, and unintended Consequences by John Ross. Order. read. meditate. :evil:

Seriously, this was a pro job. There are people capable of this, but most are in units of SAS, Navy Seals, etc. They are pros. There are of course private contractor companies like Blackwater in the US, and Executive Outcomes in South Africa. Someone who is a merk, and assassin, trained in SpecOps by a government did this.

I believe that the forthought and planning seen here makes coincidence an impossibility. I'd suggest you look at future laws. Guns are a tool, kind of like the internet, and lawyers. They are tools which protect your liberty. Taking guns is the 1st step. Afterwards, it's things you can't say, government checks of private property.

I know most Australians (most Americans, for that matter), would think I'm crazy for saying this, but your country is being set up for truly nasty things.

the government is planning these things probably for a couple decades away though. Get gun owners dead, or too old to fight. Make sure the young are afraid. Now, not later, now is the time to take action.

An NRA-esque group should be set up by you to regain your god-given rights (b/c you have the right to self-defense regardless of nation), then do a time limit. 10 years. If there is no change in 10 years, if the government still refuses to admit atleast it's complicity in aiding and abetting mass murder (possibly planning and carrying it out), well as we have been known to say on this site from time to time VOTE FROM THE ROOFTOPS
 
Carl N. Brown: I would think you were paranoid, until I learned
that the official report on the Dublane massacre
in UK will be sealed under the Official Secrets Act
for 100 years.

Why?

The killer was a known mental case and police informant/
A set up?

I used to get called a Tinfoil Hat Yank Nutjob among other things (mostly derogatory) when I mentioned that in the UK.:rolleyes:

One Frothing at the mouth (almost literally) Uber Liberal actually went as far as to say that for questioning the "Official Story" that I was "A Traitor to the Crown" and that I should be Publicly executed & my remains put on public display as a warning...:scrutiny:

needless to say I avoided that person after that & it was one more reason for me to move back to the US...

Cortez, come to Idaho, you both you & your guns would be welcome here.:cool:
icon14.gif
 
Zedicus

If I were younger and in good health I would LOVE to move permanently to the States.

Could you please persuade President Bush to invade us soon. You'll defeat us easily, because our armed forces have been stripped bare and then you can take us over as your 53(?) state and we could come under your constitution.

Thanks for the invite and I meant what I said at the beginning of this answer.:)
 
Could you please persuade President Bush to invade us soon. You'll defeat us easily, because our armed forces have been stripped bare and then you can take us over as your 53(?) state and we could come under your constitution.

Yes, bringing freedom to your country would be nice and all that. But the real question is, could we get good beer instead of the cheap nasty stuff mass produced domestically? :D

I can see the anti-war t-shirts now, "No blood for beer". Good luck finding college kids to protest THAT.
 
mordechaianiliewicz

I always found it strange that everyone except for gun owners accepted the "government" version of what happenend at Port Arthur. However any attempt to try to examine the massacre with a clinical and critical eye is always greeted with derision and outright vilification and those who do not accept the "accepted" version are labelled "conspiracy theorist gun nuts" and are consequently marginalised.

It is impossible to have a rational discussion about the massacre. From the point of view of propaganda and shaping people's minds, the Port Arthur Massacre and its reporting may well go down, one day, as a classical piece of misinformation deliberately designed to hide the truth and shape people's views. The fact that the Federal Government has a 30 year embargo on information relating to the case indicates that there is stuff to hide.

What worries me about Australia is that this country started life as a penal colony, which was ruled by an elite governing class, aided by a strong military force initially and then a para-military police force. This history shaped a lot of the attitudes that exist in Australia today. People who live in the cities for the most part will always toe the government line without question and those that live on the land well away from urban centres have a very much more questioning attitude and a healthy dislike and suspicion of government and the dictates of government. This latter does not sit well with the various governments in this country.

Much of what passes for democratic government here would never be tolerated in the USA. Your constitution is your greatest shield. We have no such thing. We are controlled by "Common Law" and this is a reflection of what ever the parliament of the day wants it to be. Most people don't know this, but Australia is probably one of the most heavily regulated contries in the world.

I have often felt, that, because of our isolation and our small population and the power of government here, we are often used, without our knowledge, as a laboratory for various social engineering experiments. I won't go into detail about this because you'd really think I was a nut case. You have to live here to understand and experience what I'm talking about but I will mention two things that are relevant.

Multiculturalism was thrust down the Austrlian public's collective throats and proclaimed as the answer to the worlds problems. It has proved to be anything but. It has resulted in ethnic enclaves in every capital city in Australia and a refusal by many immigrants who have since become citizens, to integrate into the Australian community. This "ism" is slowly tearing this country apart.

The other thing, which in its own way is even more insidious is what is happening with industry and jobs in this country. You've got similar problems in the States. Most of our major industries have some or all of their operations moved overseas to places like India or China where labour is dirt cheap. We are losing expertise in the industrial area at an ever accelerating pace.

It is highly likely that in the forseeable future this country will be reduce to a dual layered workforce - one layer consisting of those whose qualifications are such that they are in demand anywhere in the world and they can command their own price, and the second layer consisting of the majority of the population whose skills can be matched by poorer countries, thereby destroying employment opportunities here at home. I fear that we will become a country which is purely a resources bin for the world, populated for the greater part by a subservient population which relies for its existence on Social Security.

I'm glad I won't be around a lot longer.:mad:
 
Cortez: I have often felt, that, because of our isolation and our small population and the power of government here, we are often used, without our knowledge, as a laboratory for various social engineering experiments. I won't go into detail about this because you'd really think I was a nut case.

Not me, I spent 10 years in the UK & saw much the same.
(For which many call me a nutjob when I talk about it *shrugs*)


Multiculturalism was thrust down the Austrlian public's collective throats and proclaimed as the answer to the worlds problems. It has proved to be anything but. It has resulted in ethnic enclaves in every capital city in Australia and a refusal by many immigrants who have since become citizens, to integrate into the Australian community. This "ism" is slowly tearing this country apart.

Like I said above In the UK it was much the same, they welcome them with open arms by the boatload, give them everything under the sun, then wonder why the country is deep in debt & there isn't even a fraction of enough jobs to go around & they blame everyone else.

On top of that the UK instead of Hunting down Terrorist's, prefers to "try" to appease them while at the same time stomping their own Citizens rights into the dust.

Where did that get them? oh yeah, the London Bombings:banghead:
which the media was quick to blame everyone else in the world for...:rolleyes: :banghead:
 
I always found it strange that everyone except for gun owners accepted the "government" version of what happenend at Port Arthur. However...those who do not accept the "accepted" version are labelled "conspiracy theorist gun nuts" and are consequently marginalised.
It's a simple reason, really. Unless a person has actually fired a gun, if someone tells them you can easily convert a Winchester 1873 into a full-auto MG-42, then use it's pistol grip to fire 1200 headshots/second from the hip at 3 miles away, people say "wow really?! Let's get rid of them all!"

Then you're even worse off, because now you'll never be able to get them to a range where they find out like the rest of us how damn hard it is when starting out to get lead on a target at a measly 300ft.

Then they get downright silly, demanding that replica guns and pellet guns get banned because they're being held up by fake guns since they were promised that real guns would disappear into the ether after being banned. Now you have to start searching houses of anyone who may have owned a gun at some point.

Once you lose the gun-culture it's almost impossible to get it back, and then you're left with sillyness and further sillyness (and ultimately frightening violations of civil liberties) to solve the gun-problem. Let this be a lesson to us. At least here in Cali, we're well on our way to the culture's death.
 
Martin Bryant


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mass murder in Australia:
Tavistock's Martin Bryant by Allen Douglas and Michael J. Sharp

On April 28, 1996, twenty-eight-year-old Martin Bryant entered the Broad Arrow cafeteria in Port Arthur, in the Australian state of Tasmania.

After eating lunch, he remarked to a patron, "There are a lot of WASPS, not a lot of Japs." He then picked up his bag and walked toward the entrance, where he took out a military-style semi-automatic rifle. Within 15 seconds, he had slaughtered 12 people and injured several more. Some tried to escape; he gunned them down systematically, laughing as he fired. He chased one man onto a waiting bus and killed him, then shot the bus driver. Others tried to hide beneath the bus, but he climbed underneath it and killed them, too.

A young mother with a six- and a three-year-old daughter begged, "Please don't hurt my babies." He shot her and the three-year-old, then pursued the six-year-old behind a tree, where he put the rifle to the girl's neck, and fired. After executing others in the parking lot, he drove some miles to a bed-and-breakfast, the Seascape Cottage, whose elderly owners he had known for most of his life, and whom he had murdered on his way to Port Arthur.

Armed with an extensive arsenal, moving from room to room and firing at police, he kept dozens of members of the elite Special Operations Groups of Tasmania and neighboring Victoria at bay throughout the night. Finally, at 8:45 the next morning, after setting the building afire, Bryant emerged with his clothes alight, screaming, into the arms of waiting police. The final toll, including a hostage Bryant had taken with him to Seascape from Port Arthur, was 35 dead and 20 wounded--the greatest mass murder in Australia's history.

Within days, the Liberal-National coalition government of Prime Minister John Howard called for the adoption of draconian gun control laws, which proposal was protested with huge demonstrations in Melbourne and other Australian cities; Deputy Prime Minister Tim Fischer repeatedly made the false, outlandish accusation that the demonstrations were organized by American statesman Lyndon LaRouche.

- The Tavistock Institute's lone nuts' - As {EIR} has documented (see issue of April 4, 1997), Great Britain is the command center for world terrorism today. This article will demonstrate, through examining the case of Martin Bryant, that the dozens of mass murderers who have exploded into the world's headlines over the last decade or so, constitute a special capability within the Crown's arsenal.

Already in May 1996, after a quick investigation of the Port Arthur massacre, including discussions with Australian police and counter-terror specialists, LaRouche's Australian associates in the Citizens Electoral Council charged in their newspaper, {The New Citizen}, that the incident "bore all the hallmarks of the blind terror' campaigns pioneered by the Tavistock Institute in London, an arm of British intelligence which ... has conducted precisely the kind of experiments necessary to create and manipulate damaged personalities such as Martin Bryant." The article recounted the evidence already in hand to support that conclusion; it was hysterically denounced by some of Australia's major media, and by the British Broadcasting Corporation, which broadcast the thesis all over Europe, in order to deny it.

Further investigations over the past year, supplemented by files on Tavistock which this news service has compiled since 1973, have established the following: 1. The Port Arthur events were indeed coordinated by Tavistock, the premier psychological warfare unit of the British Crown, which was founded in 1920 based upon studies of "shell shock" and related neuroses caused by the trauma of World War|I. Tavistock's strategic mission is to replace a civilization of self-ruling, industrial nation-states with a "post-industrial," globalized world ruled by a tiny oligarchy.

Toward this end, Tavistock specializes in what its own psychiatrists call "brainwashing"--the use of stress-induced fear to artificially create neurotic states of mind, which may be programmed as desired. For instance, Tavistock offered the anxiety-ridden American youth of the 1960s--hit by the Cuban missile crisis, the assassinations of political leaders, and the TV's incessant bloody images of Vietnam--a retreat from this horrifying reality, into the consolations of rock music, drugs, and sex.

Taking the bait, the future leaders of America and other nations regressed into an infantile preoccupation with self; patriotism, and an agapic concern for the "common good," were replaced by a hedonistic obsession with "my body," "my feelings"--a {counter}culture. More generally, Tavistock's "theory of turbulence" specifies that entire populations may be driven into a similar infantile regression by repeated terrorist shocks, such as the bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building, the sarin gas subway bombing in Japan, or the dozens of Martin Bryant-style mass murders around the world over the past decade.

It is precisely the "blind" nature of such events that makes them psychologically so devastating, since there seems to be no answer to the question, "Why?," and therefore, apparently there is little or nothing that can be done to prevent them. 2. British intelligence will trigger such terrorist events where it has control over the local media, and psychiatric, police, and intelligence networks.

.

As an island-nation, Australia also offered a "controlled environment" for Tavistock's experiments; in turn, the most isolated part of Australia, the island-state of Tasmania, off the continent's southeastern tip, has served as the perfect Tavistock laboratory. And, Tavistock specifies that, because of the power of the modern mass media, no matter where a terrorist attack takes place, the shock is felt worldwide--it is a "global event." 3. Martin Bryant was monitored, directed, and, in all likelihood, programmed by Tavistock networks in Tasmania, from at least the time that one of Tavistock's senior representatives in Australia, the now 88-year-old Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax, first examined Bryant in 1983-84, and set the parameters for all his future "treatment."

Dax was for decades an associate of Tavistock's longtime leader and World Federation of Mental Health chairman, Dr. John Rawlings Rees. Beginning with his collaboration with Rees in the late 1930s, Dax, by his own account, had specialized in "brainwashing." To cover its tracks, Tavistock invariably circulates what might be called the "Lee Harvey Oswald theory of mass murder"--that each such incident is the result of a "lone nut," who one day just "went crazy."

Such was the "finding" of Melbourne-based British forensic psychiatrist Dr. Paul Mullen, in his evaluation of Bryant for Bryant's defense attorney, in which Mullen concluded, "It would be more satisfactory if one could point to some simple and direct cause of the tragedy at Port Arthur"; unfortunately, Mullen said, one could not.

But, notwithstanding that Bryant was a "lone nut," Mullen confidently predicted to the {Herald Sun} of Feb. 4, 1997, that there would be "more such massacres because of strong evidence of a copycat element," a warning echoed by other Tavistock assets in Australia and abroad. Curiously, Mullen himself reportedly participated in the investigation of two mass slaughters in New Zealand, before coming to Australia. The Bryant case provides some guidelines on how to rip up this Tavistock capability, before the next atrocity is unleashed. -

Shock troops of psychiatrists' - In 1944, Bank of England chief Montagu Norman suddenly quit his banking post in order to start a Tavistock spin-off called the National Association for Mental Health. Norman had been at the apex of the international financial oligarchy: One of his proteges, longtime Australian Reserve Bank head H.C. "Nugget" Coombs, called him the "head of a secret international freemasonry of central bankers."

As such, he had supervised the banking arrangements which put Adolf Hitler in power, as {EIR} History Editor Anton Chaitkin has documented. Norman tapped his Bank of England assistant, Sir Otto Niemeyer, to be the NAMH's treasurer, and Niemeyer's niece Mary Appleby, to be general secretary of the association. Niemeyer is well known to Australians: He headed the infamous "Niemeyer mission" to Depression-wracked Australia in 1930, to tell Australia to savagely cut its health and welfare spending, in order to pay her British creditors.

The British NAMH soon gave birth to the World Federation of Mental Health, one of the first of the innumerable, anti-nation-state "non-governmental organizations" spawned by Tavistock. Affiliated with the United Nations, the WFMH was one-worldist from the outset. To head up the new organization, Norman tapped Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, the head of Tavistock in the 1930s, and then the chief of Britain's World War II Psychological Warfare Directorate.

Rees had commanded 300, mostly Tavistock-trained Army psychiatrists; since then, Tavistock has been almost indistinguishable from the various wings of British Military Intelligence (MI-6, MI-5, SAS, etc.)--a connection perhaps of relevance to the military precision with which Bryant planned and executed his mass slaughter. At the war's end, in a speech to U.S. Army psychiatrists in 1945, Rees called for the creation of "psychiatric shock troops," who would move out of the military and psychiatric institutions, in order to shape society as a whole:

"If we propose to come out into the open and to attack the social and national problems of our day, then we must have shock troops and these cannot be provided by psychiatry based wholly in institutions.

We must have mobile teams of psychiatrists who are free to move around and make contact with the local situation in their particular area.... In every country, groups of psychiatrists linked to each other ... [must begin] to move into the political and governmental field." The "mission" Rees outlined, was to create a situation "where it is possible for people of every social group to have treatment when they need it, {even when they do not wish it}, without the necessity to invoke the law" (emphasis added).

Tavistock's methods were outlined by Dr. William Sargant in his 1950s book, {The Battle for the Mind: A physiology of conversion and brain-washing.} A pioneer in the study of "shell shock," Sargant also emphasized the work of Soviet psychologist Pavlov in the 1920s and 1930s, in particular an incident in which a rising flood trapped some of Pavlov's dogs in their cages, while the water rose up to their heads, before receding. Pavlov found that the intense fear the dogs experienced "wiped clean" the tricks they had been taught, following which they could be "reprogrammed." Further experiments by the SAS/SIS during the 1950s, including in Malaya and Kenya, showed Tavistock that such stress, with resultant "reprogramming" capabilities, could be applied to entire societies.

In a 1961 series of lectures at the University of California Medical School, one of Sargant's closest collaborators, British novelist Aldous Huxley, assessed the notorious MK-Ultra mass drugging and brainwashing experiment which had been under way since the early 1950s. Huxley was the author of the 1952 book, {The Doors of Perception,} which first popularized LSD usage; he had long before fictionalized the results of such experimentation in his novel {Brave New World}. Huxley himself played a key role in MK-Ultra. With such methods, Huxley now said, in 1961 lectures entitled "Control of the Mind," there will be a "method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorships without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any real desire to rebel--by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.

And this seems to be the final revolution." Another pet project of Huxley's from the 1930s on, was the creation of what he called the "somatotonic personality": one who would not hesitate to murder. The Tavistockians operate with a construct of the human mind as a {tabula rasa} that can be imprinted, or a mechanical system that can be manipulated by such techniques. Since the essence of the human mind is, on the contrary, its inherent creative capability, Tavistockian brainwashing works only if the brainwashers can create a "controlled environment," in which the victim sees only the alternatives presented by his tormentors. - Tavistock deploys to Australia - In the early 1950s, Rees sent two of his "psychiatric shock troops" to Australia, Dr. Eric Cunningham Dax and Dr. Fred E. Emery.

Dax had written a chapter for Rees's 1949 book, {Modern Practise in Psychological Medicine}, and had trained at the same hospital where Rees had practiced. Dax was also a protege of Sargant. Sargant had initiated a brainwashing technique called "deep sleep," in which patients were given massive doses of drugs, to keep them asleep 20 hours or more a day, which increased their susceptibility to "programming." Under Sargant's tutelage, Dax performed 1,300 experiments in deep sleep, and rapidly became one of Britain's top practitioners of so-called "physical methods" of psychiatry, which included pre-frontal lobotomies, on which Dax wrote a monograph, and electric shock, which was often administered during "deep sleep." The acknowledged problem with "deep sleep," was that up to 2% of the patients subjected to it, died;

those who lived were often psychologically destroyed. Arriving in Australia In 1952, Dax set up the Mental Hygiene Department of Victoria, which in turn set up Australia's entire mental health care system. As Rees said in his introduction to the book he told Dax to write, {Asylum to Community: The Development of The Mental Hygiene Service in Victoria, Australia}: "The Mental Hygiene Service of Victoria, may, indeed, have provided a major training ground in psychiatry and mental health work for all the English-speaking populations of the South-western Pacific region, and this is a matter of very great importance."
 
The second Tavistock brainwasher whom Rees dispatched to Melbourne around the same time, and whose work would help shape Dax's own, Dr. Fred Emery, set up shop as Senior Research Officer in the Department of Audio Visual Aids at Melbourne University. There, Emery began conducting experiments on schoolchildren, as described in his article "Psychological Effects of the Western' Film," to see how "oedipal patterns" could be induced in schoolchildren--a subject of some relevance to 28-year-old Martin Bryant, and the mysterious deaths of both his father and Martin's own elderly girl friend.

By the early 1960s, Emery, together with the chairman of Tavistock's governing council, Dr. Eric Trist, was giving lectures to select audiences at Tavistock on methods to brainwash entire societies. In this new age of mass communication, they said, a series of short, universal shocks would destabilize a targetted population, plunging it into a form of "shell shock," a mass neurosis.

If the shocks were repeated over a period of years, a more and more infantile pattern of thinking would develop. Emery elaborated these concepts in his 1967 article in Tavistock's magazine {Human Relations,} entitled, "The Next Thirty Years: Concepts, Methods and Anticipations," and in his 1975 "Futures We Are In." In the latter, he outlined the three stages of this process: 1) People would "lose their moral judgment"; 2) next, "segmentation"--societal disintegration--would begin, in which the individual's focus moves from the nation-state to preoccupation with local community or family; and finally, 3) "disassociation" would set in, "a world in which fantasy and reality are indistinguishable," in which the individual becomes the societal unit.

Emery calls this final result "Clockwork Orange," after the Anthony Burgess novel, in which habitual, random violence by gangs of youth is the order of the day, while adults retreat to their television sets and other forms of "virtual reality."

In 1980, Trist looked back at the last two decades of the assassination of the Kennedys, of Martin Luther King, the Vietnam War, the oil shocks, the Iranian hostage crisis, etc., and announced that the process Tavistock had predicted, had indeed begun, and would now accelerate. Meanwhile, in Australia, Dax brought Sargant to Melbourne on Aug. 14, 1962, to lecture on "The Mechanism of Brainwashing and Conversion." Another of Sargant's proteges, the Sydney-based psychiatrist Dr. Harry Bailey, was a fanatical practitioner of "deep sleep," and killed a number of patients during experiments at the Chelmsford Private Hospital in the 1960s and 1970s.

The resulting scandal led to the convening of an investigatory Royal Commission into Deep Sleep, and to Bailey's own suicide in 1985. As reported in the book {Deep Sleep,} by Brian Bromberger and Janet Fyfe-Yeomans, which chronicled Bailey's experiments, Bailey and Sargant "remained in constant contact for almost 30 years, and ... Bailey often spoke of the competition between them to see who could keep their patients in the deepest coma without killing them."

Dax himself pushed ahead with research on "turbulence," "aggression," and "brainwashing"--all from the Reesian perspective of using psychiatry to shape society as a whole, as exemplified by a speech he gave at the University of Melbourne on July 20, 1964, titled "Some Observations on Psychiatric Research." "It is no more than a few years past," he said, "when psychiatry was solely represented by the mental hospitals, before the child guidance clinics were first begun or the psychiatrists started to move into the outpatient diagnostic centres.... The mental hospitals may be likened to the grandmothers of community psychiatry....

Within the span of a single generation, psychiatrists have been thrown from the protective, circumscribed and alienating walls of these hospitals into a restless, changing and aggressive community, seething with turbulence, which struggles to adjust to the gathering speed of mechanization and the disrupting forces of a disordered society.

"Most of us are more experienced in the treatment of individuals than in correcting the pathological behavior of groups, though there may be an increasing tendency to seek our advice in these and related matters. For instance, the frightening implications of forcible indoctrination of individuals on the one level and communities on the other are closely related to our specialty. Yet almost paradoxically we are driven to consider as to whether modifications of such methods of indoctrination can be used in the treatment of some of the psychoses."

Foreshadowing his work on Martin Bryant, Dax continued: "In many of these fields, the {consideration of aggression is of the greatest importance. There is no more useful subject for research studies at the present time, whether it be in the individual or the group}.

Here, from the individual, the psychiatrist has much to learn. It may be that the aggression is turned inwards, ultimately resulting in suicide, outwards in homicide, or more specifically in hostility towards the community, in causing death on the road...

"Moreover many a murderer has the inability to postpone his strong emotional reactivity to thwarting, and this often has an association with a past history of repeated frustration of a variety with which he has been unable to deal.

Or again, the person who uses a motor car as an extension of his own aggressive body image may be using it in escaping from his anxieties and supposed rejection by the community. Yet it seems that none of these aggressive manifestations would be of the same magnitude were it not for the effect of alcohol. It releases these strains by depressing the inadequate control which spreads its thin veneer over the underlying aggression" (emphasis added).

Precisely these elements were to arise in the Martin Bryant case. In 1969, Dax left his prestigious, highly influential position in Melbourne to go to the backwater state of Tasmania, an island of some 300,000 people off Australia's southeast coast. A prominent U.S. psychiatrist who specializes in ritual abuse, and who is intimately familiar with Australian psychiatry over the past three decades, when queried by this news service as to why in the world Dax would move to Tasmania, replied: "Tasmania is the Appalachia of Australia.

There is a lot of alcoholism, a lot of incest. It is the poorest of all the states, very primitive, with a lot of descendants from very violent criminals from the British days. You will find many people there with no value system, no super-ego. It is the perfect place for Manchurian candidates, and for all sorts of experiments. He could do whatever he wanted there." Something of great interest must have been taking place in Tasmania, because two of Tavistock's leading international operatives, the Melbourne-based Dr. Alan Stoller, a past president of the World Federation of Mental Health and a close associate of John Rawlings Rees and of Dax, and Dr. John Bowlby, went to Tasmania for extended visits in 1971 and 1972, respectively. - Dax and Bryant - From early childhood, Martin Bryant was a very disturbed individual, as British psychiatrist Paul Mullen could not help but record in his evaluation for the defense:

"Mr. Bryant was assessed on a number of occasions by psychologists and psychiatrists.... He was noted to be aggressive, destructive and very difficult with other children.... There are references to him stealing, to him having violent outbursts and to tormenting vulnerable children.... There are records of Mr. Bryant torturing and harassing animals and of tormenting his sister."

Bryant was notorious among his schoolmates for carrying a green can of gasoline, which he constantly threatened to pour on things and set them alight, as he once did so on himself. His schoolmates would frequently remark, "Here comes silly Martin with his can."

Before long, this behavior brought him to the attention of Dax, as Mullen noted: "In February 1984 Mr. Bryant was assessed by a very experienced clinical psychiatrist, Dr. Cunningham-Dax," an evaluation which set the parameters for all further treatment of Bryant.

Contacted by an American academic on April 16, 1997 about his evaluation of Bryant, Dax said, "I left Tasmania in 1983, I think it was, and I had seen him a few times before that, but I had no notes on him, except that I thought that he was below normal intellectually and that his father was very permissive about him. And I wondered about the boy, whether later he might have some schizophrenic features. But that is as far as I went."

Judging by the impact Bryant made on another psychiatrist who examined Bryant soon after, Dax was singularly unobservant. Dr. Ian Sale, psychiatrist for the prosecution, recalled in a discussion on April 16: "When he was about 16 or 17, he was examined by a government doctor for the purpose of a pension assessment. It was to that doctor that he made some reference to having a wish to {shoot people}. She still remembers that to this day" (emphasis added).

Dr. Sale noted that, not only did Dax have "no recall of the assessment," but that, "unfortunately, the clinical notes that were made, were destroyed," ostensibly because Dax "was practicing in the rooms of another psychiatrist. When that psychiatrist died, it was a provision of his will, that his notes be destroyed, apparently, which is remarkable.

And not only were his notes destroyed, but also Dr. Cunningham-Dax's notes were destroyed." The psychiatrist, Dr. T.H.G. Dick, was also British, and had served as Tasmania's medical commissioner beginning in 1969, the year Dax moved to Tasmania. Shortly after, Dax joined Dick on the Medical Advisory Committee to Tasmania's Mental Health Commission. Despite Dax's fascination with aggression, suicide, and murder, Dax claimed he knew very little about Bryant. And, when asked to comment on the relevance of his associate Emery's "theory of turbulence" for the Port Arthur events, Dax replied, guardedly, "I don't think I can answer your question usefully."

This makes an interesting read,indeed.
 
Could you please persuade President Bush to invade us soon. You'll defeat us easily, because our armed forces have been stripped bare and then you can take us over as your 53(?) state and we could come under your constitution.

I'm sorry.

You'll have to take a number and get in line.

We have to (re)take NJ, NY, CA, IL and MA first, so they can come under our constitution.

Hint: Building nuclear bombs and acting crazy generally gets you bumped to the front of the list.
 
Here is the Port Arthur Massacre in a nutshell:

"There will never be uniform gun laws in Australia until there is a massacre in Tasmania." Barry Unsworth, New South Wales Labour Premiere, spoken at a special meeting in Hobart. Reported by the Sun Herald edition on May 5, 1996.

Well, what a coincidence!

A highly trained combat soldier entered the cafe, and in 90 seconds killed 20 people, and wounded 12 others. Most with head shots. He went on to kill 15 more outside.

The media altered photos of some kid with an IQ of 66 to make him look evil, and proclaimed him as the killer before he had even entered a plea. A retarded kid with barely any firearms experience. Uh-huh, and he has a one-shot kill rate higher than the best snipers on Earth will ever dream of, with moving targets no less, not to mention quicker kills.

A video forgery of "Martin Bryant" running away from the cafe was released. In the background of the video can be seen three men casually standing around smoking, and one filming the runner. Not behavior people exhibit during a traumatic experience.

The .223 rifle used by the killer was found with a cartridge exploded in the chamber, obviously causing the firearm to Kaboom in such a way as would have seriously injured the shooter's hand. And Bryant? No hand injuries whatsoever.

The .223 rifle was documented as having been destroyed by police after its confiscation during a buyback of some sort, long before the killings. And we are expected to believe that Martin Bryant had the brains, know-how, and connections to get his hands on it, not to mention cause documentation of its make-believe destruction.

Yeah. That kid is really a murderer. He should sit in jail forever. :banghead: :cuss:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top